Library

Video Player is loading.
 
Current Time 7:50
Duration 7:50
Loaded: 0.00%
 
The radiation had destroyed tissues in their bone marrow resulting in the number of white
x1.00


Back

Games & Quizzes

Training Mode - Typing
Fill the gaps to the Lyric - Best method
Training Mode - Picking
Pick the correct word to fill in the gap
Fill In The Blank
Find the missing words in a sentence Requires 5 vocabulary annotations
Vocabulary Match
Match the words to the definitions Requires 10 vocabulary annotations

You may need to watch a part of the video to unlock quizzes

Don't forget to Sign In to save your points

Challenge Accomplished

PERFECT HITS +NaN
HITS +NaN
LONGEST STREAK +NaN
TOTAL +
- //

We couldn't find definitions for the word you were looking for.
Or maybe the current language is not supported

  • 00:09

    It is the 15th October 1958 and a little known nuclear disaster is about to unfold in vinca,

  • 00:18

    Yugoslav republic, modern day Serbia.

  • 00:20

    In its wake 1 would be dead and 4 would be seriously injured, although largely forgotten

  • 00:26

    now… in the aftermath.. an uncharacteristic cooperation agreement between east and west

  • 00:33

    would result in several medical and nuclear research firsts.

  • 00:37

    The desire to explore the radiological consequences of the accident resulted in French British

  • 00:44

    and Yugoslav Cooperation, the results would benefit all sides of the political spectrum

  • 00:50

    and prove the usefulness of a budding international nuclear organisation.

  • 00:56

    My name is John and this is a brief history of the vinca reactor excursion and doesemetery

  • 01:03

    experiment.

  • 01:04

    ///////

  • 01:05

    Background a politically charged project.

  • 01:06

    Our story starts in the late 1940s and the establishment of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear

  • 01:12

    Sciences.

  • 01:13

    Yugoslavia had become a communist country in 1946… after the country had been liberated

  • 01:20

    at the end of ww2 and it abolished its monarchy in November 1945.

  • 01:26

    In its early years Yugoslavia was tentatively aligned with the USSR and it was amongst this

  • 01:34

    background that the Vinca institute was formed.

  • 01:38

    Politically the country would start to become more independent from the Soviet Union in

  • 01:42

    1948 with the Tito-Stalin split, needless to say this brought the fear of war between

  • 01:50

    the two communist countries.

  • 01:52

    Rumers were floating around that the ussr was close to its own atomic bomb and as such

  • 01:59

    Tito wanted to match his new rivals.

  • 02:02

    75 billion dinars (about $35 million at the 1953 exchange rate) was spent on building

  • 02:11

    and operating the country's fledgling nuclear industry; this constituted a significant part

  • 02:17

    of the country’s gdp.

  • 02:19

    In the early 1950s several organisations were set up at vinca in preparation to develop

  • 02:25

    an atomic weapon.

  • 02:26

    A Department for Spent Fuel Reprocessing was created in 1956; and a heavy water-moderated

  • 02:34

    zero-power critical assembly “RB reactor” was constructed in 1958.

  • 02:41

    This RB reactor was the first to be built inside Yugoslavia and strangely for the political

  • 02:47

    landscape was of a soviet design.

  • 02:50

    The whole vinca site was named the boris kedric institute.

  • 02:52

    The Reactor, an experimental design.

  • 02:53

    The reactor made use of roughly four tonnes of natural uranium in the form of 216 aluminium-clad

  • 02:59

    fuel rods.

  • 03:00

    Each rod was 2.5 cm in diameter and 210 cm long. The fuel rods, with a lattice spacing

  • 03:09

    of 12 cm, were contained in a cylindrical tank made of aluminium of 1 cm thickness.

  • 03:17

    One end of each fuel rod rested on the bottom of the tank.

  • 03:23

    The assembly used heavy water du02 as a moderator of the neutrons created during chain reaction.

  • 03:30

    Interestingly instead of control rods the system made use of the level of heavy water

  • 03:34

    in the tank to control the reactor.

  • 03:36

    2 safety rods were provided and were held out of the core by electromagnetics and if

  • 03:42

    power is cut then the rods fall into the core by gravity stopping the chain reaction thus

  • 03:49

    being fail safe.

  • 03:50

    A storage tank was provided under the reactor for excess heavy water.

  • 03:55

    The design was to also not have any form of neutron reflection as such it was mounted

  • 04:01

    on a supporting rack to ensure the tank was always at least 4m away from any potential

  • 04:07

    reflection surfaces.

  • 04:09

    As well as no reflective surfaces, the reactor had virtually no shielding which the operators

  • 04:15

    would find out later was not a good thing.

  • 04:20

    Now I need to quickly mention the reactor's name as it is considered a zero power installation.

  • 04:25

    You see, a zero power nuclear reactor is capable of sustaining a stable fission chain reaction

  • 04:32

    with no significant increase or decline in the reaction rate.

  • 04:37

    This type of installation is essential to gain practical experience of reactor operation,

  • 04:42

    but can still be deadly if the delicate balance isnt maintained.

  • 04:47

    //////////////

  • 04:48

    The accident “noone knew the danger they were in”.

  • 04:51

    It is the 15th october 1958 and an experiment is being undertaken at the Vinca reactor at

  • 04:58

    the Boris kedric institute.

  • 04:59

    6 operators are workinging inside the reactor hall on a subcritical foil counting experiment,

  • 05:06

    the workers rely on BF3 counters to monitor the reactivity of the reactor.

  • 05:12

    On the day the reactor had 3,995 kg of aluminum-clad natural uranium fuel inside its core.

  • 05:23

    Because the liquid level was normally used to control the system reactivity and the operators

  • 05:28

    wanted to obtain as much activation of the foils as possible, the heavy water level was

  • 05:33

    raised in increments, but it was intended to keep the assembly sub critical.

  • 05:39

    To do this at each level the bf3 counters needed to be closely monitored. ******

  • 05:44

    Two of the BF3 counters maxed out at maximum saturation level, but the 3rd was acting erratically,

  • 05:52

    this was disconnected and technical assistance was requested.

  • 05:55

    But what the operators didn't know was that the reactivity of the assembly was increasing

  • 06:01

    ever closer to super criticality.

  • 06:03

    After the assembly had been at this D2O level for around 5 to 8 minutes, one of the operators

  • 06:10

    started to smell ozone.

  • 06:13

    Originally it was thought that a valve may have been leaking but after investigation

  • 06:17

    it was realized that the system was supercritical at some unknown power level.

  • 06:23

    Upon realizing this the reactor was scrammed with its safety rods and the hall was evacuated.

  • 06:28

    A paper recorder based 540m away recorded an increased background gamma ray level for

  • 06:36

    around 10 minutes.

  • 06:37

    The heavy water level was at 183 cm and the reactor was in an uncontrolled state for 433

  • 06:45

    seconds.

  • 06:46

    During the excursion The total energy release was about 80 million joules (about 2 kg of

  • 06:54

    TNT equivalent).

  • 06:55

    A terrific amount of energy to be exposed to especially in an unshielded assembly, definitely

  • 07:02

    somewhere you would not want to be standing next to.

  • 07:05

    6 personnel had received varying doses of radiation…initially they received first

  • 07:11

    aid onsite before being sent to paris for specialist care.

  • 07:15

    The hospital they were transferred to was the world famous Curie Foundation and there

  • 07:21

    they were placed under the care of Dr. H. Jammet.

  • 07:25

    Of the 6 exposed individuals 1 was to be treated conventionally with blood transfusion this

  • 07:32

    was due to his exposure being significantly lower than the others.

  • 07:37

    But it was quickly realized that the others would require some drastic treatment, as they

  • 07:42

    had received in some cases close to and well over a lethal dose.

  • 07:48

    The radiation had destroyed tissues in their bone marrow, resulting in the number of white

  • 07:53

    blood cells falling sharply.

  • 07:55

    At the time the concept of bone marrow transplants was in its early stages, great strides had

  • 08:01

    been made in the field in the US but in the late 1950s it was still very much an experimental

  • 08:07

    science.

  • 08:08

    The bone marrow grafts were performed by Georges Mathe, an oncologist, and made use of donors

  • 08:15

    That were all French: Marcel Pabion, Albert Biron, Raymond Castanier and Odette Dragh.

  • 08:25

    The fifth donor was Léon Schwartzenberg, a member of Mathé's team.

  • 08:30

    The grafts and subsequent treatment helped further the concept of bone marrow grafts,

  • 08:35

    immunotherapy and how it could be used to treat cancer.

  • 08:40

    28 days post exposure treatment began, but for one of the men this was too late, they

  • 08:46

    had received too high of a dose and the treatment didn't help reverse his outcome and sadly

  • 08:53

    passed away.

  • 08:54

    However for the other 4 the grafts worked and they gradually made a recovery, reportedly

  • 09:00

    still being alive in 1980 19 years post exposure with at least 1 of the men becoming a father

  • 09:07

    to a healthy child.

  • 09:09

    You see what was interesting with the transplants, was that host versus graft disease was not

  • 09:14

    observed in the patients who received the bone marrow.

  • 09:16

    One theory that was posed was that the high radiation exposure had actually prevented

  • 09:21

    the creation of antibodies and in a happy side effect facilitated the incorporation

  • 09:27

    of the grafted marrow.

  • 09:29

    It was estimated that the doses of each man who was ages between 23-26 had revived in

  • 09:35

    descending order 433, 422, 415, 410, 320, and 205 rem respectively.

  • 09:47

    For reference 500 rem without any treatment is fatal and between 400-1000 can result in

  • 09:52

    early death.

  • 09:53

    It really depends on how much was received where in the body and health of the victim

  • 09:57

    prior to exposure, as will as a multitude of other factors.

  • 09:58

    Now the doses of the patients was very inaccurate due to the fact that the reactor was supercritical

  • 10:04

    for a rather long period of time, and studies into Acute radiation sickness were not very

  • 10:10

    abundant at the time.

  • 10:12

    But the reactor now powered down offered an opportunity for the scientific community in

  • 10:19

    which a study could be undertaken to further understand dose effects on humans.

  • 10:24

    The vinca dosimetric study

  • 10:27

    The situation presented to the international community and Yugoslav nuclear officials was

  • 10:33

    that if the exact doses could be ascertained through an experiment then it could be linked

  • 10:38

    up to the treatment and ars symptoms of the patients.

  • 10:44

    Post Stalin Tito split Yugoslavia was more open to collaboration with the west and in

  • 10:50

    February 1960 an agreement was signed between the federal nuclear energy committee and the

  • 10:55

    iaea where the reactor would be reactivated and prepared for an experiment.

  • 11:01

    Part of the reactivation required around 6.5 tonnes of heavy water, as the original stock

  • 11:07

    had been reused in Vincas other reactors, after negotiations with a number of IAEA member

  • 11:13

    states the United Kingdom offered the required material for free for the length of the experiment.

  • 11:20

    The French Commissariat a l 'Energie Atomique offered to make modifications to the reactor

  • 11:25

    for free as well.

  • 11:27

    The modifications consisted of detector and more comprehensive control equipment which

  • 11:32

    allowed the reactor to be placed into different reactivity states more effectively.

  • 11:39

    More obvious alterations were a wall of sandbags and concrete between the reactor hall and

  • 11:44

    control room to protect the operators from any fast neutrons.

  • 11:48

    For the experiment the reactor was to be operated in two power ranges, low and high.

  • 11:54

    This was to take place at the end of April 1960.

  • 11:59

    The low power test ran the reactor at 5w and used multiple positions to measure fast neutrons

  • 12:06

    and gamma doses.

  • 12:07

    But the high power tests were where things really got interesting as this would involve

  • 12:13

    these rather creepily characters named phantoms.

  • 12:17

    They were designed to mimic a human body to allow greater dosimetric accuracy.

  • 12:23

    The phantoms were filled with an aqueous solution of NaCl at a concentration of 15.7 mg Na per

  • 12:32

    gram of solution.

  • 12:36

    After each experiment the sodium activation was measured.

  • 12:39

    The high power experiment ran at two power levels 1kw and 5kw.

  • 12:45

    For each run the phantoms were placed in different positions with the lower being closer to the

  • 12:51

    reactor and the higher being further away.

  • 12:53

    After the experiments the iaea released its report in 1962 and its well worth reading

  • 13:01

    The study helped create a greater understanding of potential dose a person can receive in

  • 13:06

    certain circumstances.

  • 13:08

    This also Inturn helped in the understanding of the types of shielding needed to protect

  • 13:13

    staff from fast neutrons and gamma rays.

  • 13:16

    However the experiment wasn’t the magic catch all bullet but rather another tool available

  • 13:21

    to nuclear industry.

  • 13:23

    Even in the iaea reports own concluding remarks this is hinted upon.

  • 13:30

    “It can (thus) not be expected that data for any one accident can solve all the basic

  • 13:36

    questions at once or even any of them completely.”

  • 13:41

    What the experiment did show was the benefits of cross border cooperation when it comes

  • 13:47

    to radiological investigation.

  • 13:49

    The disaster and subsequent experiment showed that the young iaea which was founded in 1957

  • 13:56

    could work as a concept for interstate nuclear industry Cooperation.

  • 14:01

    After all, it did successfully broker an agreement where an experiment in a Soviet designed reactor

  • 14:07

    based in Yugoslavia modified by the french and filled with British heavy water could

  • 14:13

    be used for the greater good of dosimetry discovery.

  • 14:16

    Now where would you rate this disaster on my scale? I’m going to give it a 3 on my

  • 14:21

    disaster scale due to the death of a young operator and the horrible pain the other must

  • 14:25

    have gone through, but an 8 on my legacy scale because of international cooperation, valuable

  • 14:31

    information gained from the experiement and the successful use of bone marrow grafts.

  • 14:36

    This video is a Plainly Difficult production. All videos on the channel are creative commons

  • 14:41

    Attribution-ShareAlike. Plainly difficult videos are produced by me

  • 14:45

    John, in a sunny Southeastern corner of london, uk.

  • 14:48

    Help the channel grow by liking commenting and subscribing! Check out my twitter for

  • 14:53

    all sorts of photos and odd and sods, as well as hints on future videos! I've got patreon

  • 14:58

    and youtube membership as well so if you fancy check them out! All that's left to say is

  • 15:04

    thank you for watching!.

  • 15:09

    https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/nuclear/radevents/1958YUG1.html

  • 15:10

    https://nonproliferation.org/titos-nuclear-legacy/

  • 15:12

    https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull2-2/02205800405.pdf

  • 15:13

    https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/38/085/38085294.pdf?r=1

  • 15:15

    https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/20918988

  • 15:16

    https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML003731912.pdf page 96

  • 15:21

    https://www.vin.bg.ac.rs/en/about-institute/history-of-the-institute

All

The example sentences of SANDBAGS in videos (11 in total of 11)

all determiner right verb, base form i personal pronoun needed verb, past tense a determiner belt noun, singular or mass we personal pronoun have verb, non-3rd person singular present two cardinal number cases noun, plural over preposition or subordinating conjunction here adverb sandbags noun, plural snail verb, non-3rd person singular present watches noun, plural another determiner girl noun, singular or mass
more adverb, comparative obvious adjective alterations noun, plural were verb, past tense a determiner wall noun, singular or mass of preposition or subordinating conjunction sandbags noun, plural and coordinating conjunction concrete adjective between preposition or subordinating conjunction the determiner reactor noun, singular or mass hall noun, singular or mass and coordinating conjunction
and coordinating conjunction because preposition or subordinating conjunction they personal pronoun can modal t proper noun, singular test noun, singular or mass the determiner ride noun, singular or mass on preposition or subordinating conjunction actual adjective people noun, plural , they personal pronoun send verb, non-3rd person singular present sandbags noun, plural down particle the determiner
next proper noun, singular to to the determiner wall noun, singular or mass were verb, past tense sandbags noun, plural to to ensure verb, base form that preposition or subordinating conjunction bullets noun, plural did verb, past tense not adverb ricochet verb, base form , and coordinating conjunction as preposition or subordinating conjunction she personal pronoun was verb, past tense brought verb, past participle
solid adjective sandbags noun, plural work verb, non-3rd person singular present great adjective we personal pronoun 've verb, non-3rd person singular present got verb, past participle a determiner rubber noun, singular or mass block noun, singular or mass here adverb and coordinating conjunction as adverb far adverb as preposition or subordinating conjunction holding verb, gerund or present participle
arrows noun, plural are verb, non-3rd person singular present just adverb flying verb, gerund or present participle through preposition or subordinating conjunction those determiner sandbags noun, plural and coordinating conjunction actually adverb the determiner lightweight noun, singular or mass bolts noun, plural were verb, past tense n't adverb for preposition or subordinating conjunction those determiner
panel noun, singular or mass , so preposition or subordinating conjunction you personal pronoun 'll modal want verb, base form to to have verb, base form a determiner good adjective sturdy noun, singular or mass light noun, singular or mass stand noun, singular or mass and coordinating conjunction a determiner few adjective sandbags noun, plural .
said verb, past tense that preposition or subordinating conjunction people noun, plural used verb, past participle to to put verb, base form weights noun, plural and coordinating conjunction sandbags noun, plural onto preposition or subordinating conjunction their possessive pronoun eyelids noun, plural and coordinating conjunction then adverb they personal pronoun would modal notice verb, base form that preposition or subordinating conjunction
the determiner coaster noun, singular or mass was verb, past tense built verb, past participle and coordinating conjunction tested verb, past participle in preposition or subordinating conjunction ohio proper noun, singular , using verb, gerund or present participle monkeys noun, plural and coordinating conjunction sandbags noun, plural before preposition or subordinating conjunction human adjective trials noun, plural .
that preposition or subordinating conjunction said verb, past participle , it personal pronoun 's verb, 3rd person singular present probably adverb best adjective, superlative if preposition or subordinating conjunction you personal pronoun put verb, past tense up preposition or subordinating conjunction sandbags noun, plural to to stop verb, base form a determiner flood noun, singular or mass instead adverb of preposition or subordinating conjunction doing verb, gerund or present participle
i personal pronoun have verb, non-3rd person singular present sandbags noun, plural to to hold verb, base form the determiner base noun, singular or mass down adverb because preposition or subordinating conjunction even adverb though preposition or subordinating conjunction i personal pronoun tried verb, past tense to to make verb, base form sure adjective it personal pronoun 's verb, 3rd person singular present super adjective balanced adjective ,

Definition and meaning of SANDBAGS

What does "sandbags mean?"

/ˈsan(d)ˌbaɡ/

noun
bag filled with sand.
verb
To deceive by not revealing your true nature.