British film censorship can be a delicate issue.
British film censorship can be a delicate issue.

Welcome to WatchMojo UK, and today we’ll be counting down the Top 10 Movies Banned
Welcome to WatchMojo UK, and today we’ll be counting down the Top 10 Movies Banned

in Britain.
in Britain.

For this list, we’ll be looking at films from around the world that were either denied
For this list, we’ll be looking at films from around the world that were either denied

classification or pulled from release in the United Kingdom, be it for excessive violence,
classification or pulled from release in the United Kingdom, be it for excessive violence,

graphic imagery or any other number of reasons.
graphic imagery or any other number of reasons.

Just to clarify, these films don't necessarily have to be still banned today, but they must
Just to clarify, these films don't necessarily have to be still banned today, but they must

have faced some adversity during their initial release, and that includes censored cuts where
have faced some adversity during their initial release, and that includes censored cuts where

the offensive content was removed.
the offensive content was removed.

Though set in the UK, the sequel to the 2009 cult horror film was initially refused classification
Though set in the UK, the sequel to the 2009 cult horror film was initially refused classification

from the BBFC - British Board of Film Classification, in 2011.
from the BBFC - British Board of Film Classification, in 2011.

They deemed the film as “sexually violent and potentially obscene” even compared to
They deemed the film as “sexually violent and potentially obscene” even compared to

the original, and initially said that even a new censored cut would be refused a certificate.
the original, and initially said that even a new censored cut would be refused a certificate.

The film’s director Tom Six fought back against the BBFC’s refusal, and a new cut
The film’s director Tom Six fought back against the BBFC’s refusal, and a new cut

with nearly three minutes removed was approved a few months later, and the film received
with nearly three minutes removed was approved a few months later, and the film received

an 18 certificate for its straight-to-DVD release.
an 18 certificate for its straight-to-DVD release.

Though this psychological thriller starring Dustin Hoffman was released uncut in the UK
Though this psychological thriller starring Dustin Hoffman was released uncut in the UK

in 1971, as opposed to the censored American version, “Straw Dogs” was later refused
in 1971, as opposed to the censored American version, “Straw Dogs” was later refused

classification by the BBFC in 1984 due to the recently implemented Video Recordings
classification by the BBFC in 1984 due to the recently implemented Video Recordings

Act.
Act.

The main issue was the film’s two explicit rape scenes, which had already been trimmed
The main issue was the film’s two explicit rape scenes, which had already been trimmed

for the American version, and the board deemed neither version suitable for home distribution.
for the American version, and the board deemed neither version suitable for home distribution.

Several more attempts were made over the years before the BBFC finally classified the uncut
Several more attempts were made over the years before the BBFC finally classified the uncut

version for release in 2002.
version for release in 2002.

The BBFC refused to classify this Wes Craven-directed horror film in 1972, but it did receive a
The BBFC refused to classify this Wes Craven-directed horror film in 1972, but it did receive a

mildly censored release on home video in the early 80s due to a more relaxed attitude to
mildly censored release on home video in the early 80s due to a more relaxed attitude to

video censorship at the time.
video censorship at the time.

Unfortunately, the video nasty scare in the UK saw the film then banned on VHS too, for
Unfortunately, the video nasty scare in the UK saw the film then banned on VHS too, for

the rest of the century.
the rest of the century.

However, appeals from British fans, and critics like Mark Kermode, continuously called for
However, appeals from British fans, and critics like Mark Kermode, continuously called for

a revision due to the film’s historical significance to the horror genre - and eventually
a revision due to the film’s historical significance to the horror genre - and eventually

its censored version was released in 2002, followed by the full uncut version in 2008.
its censored version was released in 2002, followed by the full uncut version in 2008.

This disturbing film about the lives of a group of circus freak show performers was
This disturbing film about the lives of a group of circus freak show performers was

perhaps too ahead of its time.
perhaps too ahead of its time.

The film was heavily censored and eventually pulled from release in the United States,
The film was heavily censored and eventually pulled from release in the United States,

whilst it was outright refused classification in the United Kingdom, as the BBFC thought
whilst it was outright refused classification in the United Kingdom, as the BBFC thought

the film exploited its cast of deformed actors for commercial gain.
the film exploited its cast of deformed actors for commercial gain.

The film was finally approved for release 30 years
The film was finally approved for release 30 years

later in 1963 but still underwent numerous reclassifications afterwards, settling on
later in 1963 but still underwent numerous reclassifications afterwards, settling on

a 12 rating for its current home video release.
a 12 rating for its current home video release.

The film has since gained a cult following.
The film has since gained a cult following.

Though the debut film from director Quentin Tarantino received a British theatrical release
Though the debut film from director Quentin Tarantino received a British theatrical release

with little fuss in 1992, “Reservoir Dogs” later encountered problems that drastically
with little fuss in 1992, “Reservoir Dogs” later encountered problems that drastically

delayed its home video release.
delayed its home video release.

Due to ongoing revisions to the Video Recordings Act in the wake of the 1993 murder of James
Due to ongoing revisions to the Video Recordings Act in the wake of the 1993 murder of James

Bulger, potentially risqué films such as “Reservoir Dogs” were held from home video
Bulger, potentially risqué films such as “Reservoir Dogs” were held from home video

classification until the new bill was finalised.
classification until the new bill was finalised.

Thankfully, once everything was cleared up, the film passed censorship and received the
Thankfully, once everything was cleared up, the film passed censorship and received the

same 18 certificate it gained on theatrical release in 1995.
same 18 certificate it gained on theatrical release in 1995.

This Italian film revolutionized the genre we know today as ‘found footage’ horror,
This Italian film revolutionized the genre we know today as ‘found footage’ horror,

but at the time it caused controversy around the world due to scenes so graphic, many suspected
but at the time it caused controversy around the world due to scenes so graphic, many suspected

it was a genuine snuff film and the filmmakers had to go to court to prove otherwise.
it was a genuine snuff film and the filmmakers had to go to court to prove otherwise.

The film was denied theatrical distribution in
The film was denied theatrical distribution in

the UK, but videos at the time didn’t require classification and it was quietly released
the UK, but videos at the time didn’t require classification and it was quietly released

straight-to-video instead.
straight-to-video instead.

However, the video nasty scare made the film resurface and the film was banned on video
However, the video nasty scare made the film resurface and the film was banned on video

too in 1984.
too in 1984.

In 2001 a version with up to six minutes cut was released,
In 2001 a version with up to six minutes cut was released,

followed by an almost complete version in 2011.
followed by an almost complete version in 2011.

Whilst not officially banned by the BBFC, this Oscar-winning horror film was made unavailable
Whilst not officially banned by the BBFC, this Oscar-winning horror film was made unavailable

on home video in the UK for over a decade.
on home video in the UK for over a decade.

“The Exorcist” went through its theatrical release and initial video release without
“The Exorcist” went through its theatrical release and initial video release without

any problems, but yes, you guessed it, the video nasty police once again caused some
any problems, but yes, you guessed it, the video nasty police once again caused some

second-guessing.
second-guessing.

Though the majority of the board was ready to pass the film for video re-release, then-director
Though the majority of the board was ready to pass the film for video re-release, then-director

James Ferman elected to deny classification.
James Ferman elected to deny classification.

All copies of the film were pulled from UK store shelves until 1999, until a censorship
All copies of the film were pulled from UK store shelves until 1999, until a censorship

relaxation saw it deemed safe for distribution.
relaxation saw it deemed safe for distribution.

Though it did initially gain theatrical distribution in the country, the BBFC later decided that
Though it did initially gain theatrical distribution in the country, the BBFC later decided that

this game-changing horror film from Tobe Hooper should be banned in the UK.
this game-changing horror film from Tobe Hooper should be banned in the UK.

Achieving horror through suspense and disturbing images rather than gore and violence, the
Achieving horror through suspense and disturbing images rather than gore and violence, the

film was still deemed too horrific for British audiences.
film was still deemed too horrific for British audiences.

If that wasn’t enough, the BBFC also barred the word “chainsaw” itself from movie
If that wasn’t enough, the BBFC also barred the word “chainsaw” itself from movie

titles.
titles.

After the third entry in the franchise faced similar treatment upon submission in 1990,
After the third entry in the franchise faced similar treatment upon submission in 1990,

the original film was finally deemed worthy for release in 1999.
the original film was finally deemed worthy for release in 1999.

Director Sam Raimi didn’t seem particularly worried about censorship as he set out to
Director Sam Raimi didn’t seem particularly worried about censorship as he set out to

make one of the goriest movies of its time, and his debut film “The Evil Dead” ended
make one of the goriest movies of its time, and his debut film “The Evil Dead” ended

up capturing the attention of audiences worldwide.
up capturing the attention of audiences worldwide.

This includes the UK, where it became the best-selling video of the year in 1983.
This includes the UK, where it became the best-selling video of the year in 1983.

However, its popularity combined with its violent and disturbing imagery made it the
However, its popularity combined with its violent and disturbing imagery made it the

prime target.
prime target.

The film was then banned from UK home video distribution until 1990, and the dispute surrounding
The film was then banned from UK home video distribution until 1990, and the dispute surrounding

its release only ended up increasing its cult reputation in the horror community.
its release only ended up increasing its cult reputation in the horror community.

Before we reveal our top pick, here are a few honourable mentions:
Before we reveal our top pick, here are a few honourable mentions:

This is a rare example of a filmmaker censoring himself.
This is a rare example of a filmmaker censoring himself.

Though “A Clockwork Orange” did initially receive a theatrical release in the UK, director
Though “A Clockwork Orange” did initially receive a theatrical release in the UK, director

Stanley Kubrick himself requested that the film be pulled from cinemas.
Stanley Kubrick himself requested that the film be pulled from cinemas.

“Clockwork” was extremely controversial due to its depiction of violence and rape,
“Clockwork” was extremely controversial due to its depiction of violence and rape,

and it was cited as an influencing factor in two murder cases at the time.
and it was cited as an influencing factor in two murder cases at the time.

Kubrick denied the film was to blame, but pulled the film due to the harassment his
Kubrick denied the film was to blame, but pulled the film due to the harassment his

family received because of it.
family received because of it.

It remained banned in the UK until after Kubrick’s death in 1999.
It remained banned in the UK until after Kubrick’s death in 1999.