Games & Quizzes
Don't forget to Sign In to save your points
This is a modal window.
PERFECT HITS | +NaN | |
HITS | +NaN | |
LONGEST STREAK | +NaN | |
TOTAL | + |
Imagine that Leonardo, ever the devout believer, receives a message from Splinter,
who says that God wants Leonardo to do something incomprehensible.
You must take your youngest mutant Michelangelo to the top of the Empire State Building and sacrifice him.
Utterly devastated, but equally unwilling to believe the messages are a hoax,
Leonardo takes the happy-go-lucky Michelangelo to the Empire State Building.
Fortunately for him, at the last moment, Leonardo's hand is stayed when an alternate sacrifice suddenly appears.
He does not have to sacrifice his beloved Michelangelo. Leonardo was relieved that his
devotion was rewarded, while Michelangelo can't understand how Leonardo could buy into
such nonsense. Splinter's message couldn't possibly be from God, and if there is a God,
he would never ask Leonardo to do something so horrific, right?
For American Philosopher William James, the question of belief in God is one of the most important questions
we will ever consider. Lot's of people already believe, and lots don't, so depending on who you talk to,
believing is considered like "Well of course he's real" or like "Please, what sort of idiot believes this crap?"
When pressed on their reasoning for the matter of their belief, the believer and non believer
can come up with equally compelling arguments.. For James, a belief's value resides in how it cashes out. Not in whether it's true in some objective sense.
In other words, how useful believing is. Rationality and empirical evidence
are no help with deciding our belief, because, as one philosopher said, you can't poke God with a stick.
Consequently, James thinks it's acceptable to believe in something despite its lack of scientific rigor.
In other words, our emotional nature comes into play on certain beliefs.
/əmˈpirik(ə)l/
based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic.
/kənˈsidərd/
having been thought about carefully. To think carefully about something.
/ˈrēz(ə)niNG/
action of thinking about something in logical. To think and make conclusions in a logical manner.
/diˈsīdiNG/
serving to resolve or settle something. To make a legal judgment in court.
action of one object striking another. Acts or forces of one thing hitting something else. come into forcible contact with another object.
/ˈsakrəˌfīs/
Decision to give up a thing to get another thing. Decision to give up a thing to get another thing. offer or kill as religious sacrifice.