I’m super excited to tell you that this video is a collaboration with the History
Guy channel. So while this video is all about Maxwell’s equations, they have simultaneously
uploaded a fascinating video on the interesting life of James Clerk Maxwell. Check out their
video at the link in the description.
Think of any high tech appliance that you routinely use. You phone, your tv, your computer,
your refrigerator, toaster, light bulb, your car, just about anything. I can guarantee
that some engineer somewhere, sometime, used one of these equations to design it.
Almost all modern technology is based on them. These are called Maxwell’s equations in
honor of Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell who published them in 1865. He is not as well
known as Newton or Einstein, but his contributions to science are arguably among the greatest.
Somewhat like Einstein, he built on the concepts originated by other scientists, but synthesized
them and put them in mathematical terms, that allowed us to see a new kind of relationship,
in this case between electricity & magnetism, and light. He showed that they were really
just manifestations of the same phenomenon. This is one of the most important and practical
set of idea in all of classical physics.
But I think even Maxwell could not have imagined their huge implications for technology. Not
only do they describe about every electrical and magnetic phenomenon, but believe it or
not, hidden within these equations is a fundamental truth about the nature of light, and why it
is the ultimate speed of the universe.
And this truth, helped set the stage for another famous physicist, who would later change our
paradigm about the nature of reality itself.
The explanation is coming up right now…
These equations look intimidating. But don’t worry, we are not going to derive them. I
am only going to show you what they mean and what they imply in practical terms. And we
are going to visualize them with graphics that I hope you'll find useful.
Objects have something called a charge. This is a property of matter like mass is a property
of matter. In practical terms, what this means for large objects with negative charge, is
that it has more electrons than protons.
The first thing I want you to visualize is that if you have a static object with a charge,
it will affect only other charges. And if you have a static magnet, it will affect only
other magnets. It will not affect charges.
But if you have a moving charge, it will affect a magnet. And if you have a moving magnet,
it will affect a charge.
At the simplest level of description that’s what these four equations are telling us.
It is best to think of this as a field, similar to the quantum fields of quantum field theory that
I spoke about in another video. But for visualization you can think of this as being similar to
the gravitational field.
The first equation is a formula that tells us how electrical charges create electrical
fields. It is based on concepts developed by Carl Friedrich Gauss. It basically
tells us that if you have an electrical charge, there will be an electrical field emanating
from it.
If you want to know the strength of this electrical
field, you can calculate it using this equation. Note that the strength of this electric field
is proportional to a constant called Epsilon naught. This is known as the vacuum permittivity.
This is a property of the vacuum of space. It can be thought of as the resistance of free space
against the formation of an electrical field.
The second equation is referred to as Gauss’s law for magnetism. It is the equivalent of
the same equation for magnetism. But it’s kind of a negative law. It basically says that if
you had the same sphere but instead of it having a charge inside, it was a magnet, you
will never find a configuration where the magnetic lines of force always point outward,
or always point inwards. There is always as much field pointed out as there is pointed in.
It will be in loops.
In other words, a magnet will always have two poles. There are no magnetic monopoles.
You can not have a positive magnet or north pole by itself or a south pole by itself.
You might say, well I can take this magnet and cut out the north pole – wouldn’t
that create a monopole? No, you would just create a smaller magnet with two poles. You
can keep cutting this in half over and over, and you would always have two poles.
The third equation is called faraday’s law. This law basically says that if you move a magnet,
you will create an electric field. In other words if you change the magnetic field with
time, it creates an electric field. What does it mean to create an electrical field? It just
means that if you put a charge there, it will be affected. It will be accelerated.
This equation tells engineers how to generate electricity from a generator. You can take
large magnets and rotate them, and if you put a wire near it, as you move the magnet,
then electricity will be created in the wire. This is because there are electric charges
in the metal wire and as electric field lines are created, these charge will move, creating
a current of electricity.
The fourth equation is Ampere’s law. It basically says that if you have a moving charge
through a wire, or an electrical current, you generate a magnetic field. In other words,
two wires can be attracted to each other if they have current flowing through it.
The equation will tell you how strong the magnetic field would be. So if you have a
given current flowing through a wire, let’s say one amp, and you are one meter away, how
strong would the magnetic field would be at that point.
This requires another constant of nature called mu naught. This is known as the permeability
of free space. This can be thought of as the ability of free space to allow magnetic lines
of force to go through it.
Note that there are two terms in this equation. One term tells you the moving electrical charges
can create magnetic fields. And the second term tells you that moving electrical fields
can also create magnetic fields. This idea of magnetic fields being created from electric
fields was Maxwell’s addition to Ampere’s law. And he just thought it up in his head.
It was not based on experiment. He figured that there should be some symmetry with Farday’s
law. Because if moving magnetic fields could create electric fields, then moving electric
fields should also create magnetic fields.
Now, I want you to take note of epsilon naught and mu naught.
Both of these constants have to be measured, since they are inherent properties of nature.
They are not derived from anything.
You might say at this point, well, you’re just talking about electricity and magnets.
What does this have to do with light? So here comes the most interesting part.
Let’s take what we have gleaned from Maxwell’s equation, and now put it to practical use.
Put yourself in Maxwell’s shoes at this point.
You are working with equations and concepts that other people really don’t know about much
in the early 1860’s, and you are staring at them for a long time, trying to see some
patterns here. And you are mathematically trying to figure out what these equations
are telling you.
So now you think to yourself, maybe I'll do a thought experiment. What if I take an
electric charge and put it on a pole, outside my house, and I just move it up and down,
up and down. What will this cause? Well, if you did that then, according to ampere’s
law, if an electric field moves or changes with time, it would create a magnetic field
perpendicular to that.
And because of the changing movement, of up and down that you're making with the charge, the magnetic field would also be changing with
time. And according to Faraday’s law the moving magnetic field lines would create another
new set of electric field lines.
Now, since the same thing is happening to these new electric field lines, that is, they
are changing over time, they would in turn create new magnetic field lines. And the new
moving magnetic field lines would create yet more electric field lines.
So this becomes like an unstoppable positive feedback loop of electric fields creating
magnetic fields creating electrical fields, creating magnetic fields, and so on. Each is produced by the
movement of the other.
You have just created a self propagating wave.
This is analogous to throwing a rock in a lake. It disturbs the water, so the water
starts to oscillate, and pulls its neighboring molecules up. So the first wave will pull its neighboring molecules up, which oscillates more water,
which moves more of the molecules from neighboring water. And this is the way a water wave propagates.
So now you Mr. Maxwell, are trying to figure out what kind of wave you have just created.
This wave must be occurring in nature because electricity and magnetism exist. So you think
about that. Well, what would this wave look like? How fast is this wave moving?
So you calculate using what you think the speed could be by manipulating the equations
that you have. You do this by, using advanced multivariable calculus, which Maxwell was exceptionally
good at. We won’t go through how it’s done here. But what he come up with is one
over “V’ squared is equal to epsilon naught times Mu naught.
Solving you get Velocity, you get that it's equal to the square root of one over epsilon naught times Mu naught.
So what the equations are saying is, the velocity of this wave is inversely proportional to the
permittivity and permeability of free space. Does this even make any sense?
Well, permittivity can be thought of, as I said earlier, as the resistance of free space against the formation of an
electrical field. Think of this like viscosity, a more viscous fluid like molasses would be
harder to swim through than water. You wouldn’t swim very fast in molasses.
Similarly, a wave flowing through a substance with lower permittivity would propagate faster.
For free space, epsilon naught is equal to the following number (see above).
And permeability can be thought of as the resistance of a material against the formation
of a magnetic field.
And it's equal to this number (see above).
So it makes sense that the velocity of any wave would be inversely proportional to the
resistance of the substance it is travelling in.
You might ask, well why are mu naught and epsilon naught those exact values. That’s
a good question. No one knows why. These are just the constants of nature.
These are properties of free space that tell us how fast magnetic fields and electric fields
can interact with each other. If there is a finite speed with which the electric and magnetic
fields can interact with each other, then it sets a limit on how fast these fields can
propagate through space.
In a different substance, or a different universe, these constants could be different.
Now we take the measured values of these two constants, and do some simple math.
Lo and behold what you find is that the wave you have just created is moving at about 300,000
km per second. This is really fast. This would go all the way around the earth almost 8 times,
or close to the distance of the moon in one second. What kind of wave moves this fast?
You're Maxwell, and you say to yourself, "Wait a minute, you remember that in 1728, English astronomer James Bradley,
had calculated what the speed of light is. It's about 297,000 km/sec.
And a huge Eureka moment hits him that
light must really just be a manifestation of electricity and magnetism. It is an electromagnetic
wave.
Can you imagine how Maxwell’s insight from this must have felt? There was a point in
time when Maxwell was the only person in the world who realized this.
Now, he could not prove it at the time but about 20 years later, Heinrich Hertz, proved experimentally
that Maxwell was absolutely right.
And the rest of the story is that about 40 years later another great scientist
by the name of Albert Einstein did his own thought experiments, inspired by Maxwell’s equations.
And his thought experiment was based on one simple assumption. He asked himself, if the speed of
light is an inherent property of space, why would this speed be any different based on
the speed of the observer?
It should not matter whether you measured the speed of light moving on a fast train,
or whether you measured it standing still. It should be the same regardless of your reference
frame.
And it was from this simple assumption, that he came up with the special theory of relativity
in 1905, which changed our ideas about the nature of time.
Later in his life, when people suggested to Einstein that stood on the shoulders of Newton,
he corrected them and said, no I stand on the shoulders of James Clerk Maxwell.
The man who inspired not only Einstein, but to a large extent is responsible for creating
the equations used by every electrical engineer to create some our most cherished and useful
technologies that we use today, is James Clerk Maxwell. And as the History guy like to say. This is history
worth remembering.
Guys…if you want to learn more about the interesting life of James Clerk Maxwell, check
out the superb video on the History Guy channel at the link in the description.
Click the like button if you like this video, and post a question in the comments. I try to answer
all of them. And I will see you in the next video my friend!