Is the entire universe a simulation?
Is your world a virtual environment coded by 1s and 0s?
Is it a conscious computer game created by supreme beings from another timeline?
What if every person on Earth was no different from a character in a movie, reading from
a script you’ve never seen?
As humans have explored virtual reality and artificial intelligence, this conspiracy has
grown in popularity.
Leaders at the forefront of modern technology have declared: it’s not just a possibility,
it’s a likelihood.
According to Elon Musk, there’s a billion to one chance that humanity is not living
inside a simulated universe.
That means our world may not exist; but is that scientifically possible?
Could our entire universe exist within one massive virtual space?
Similar questions have plagued humanity for thousands of years, long before the modern
era.
Many religions, from ancient pantheons to monotheistic traditions, claim that a supreme
being sculpted our universe from nothing.
You won’t find the word “simulation” in any religious books, but the concept is
very similar—a great entity designed our universe from scratch…
But what if that deity was trying to deceive us?
In the 17th century, French philosopher Rene Descartes discussed an all-powerful creator
in his Meditations on First Philosophy.
He imagined a deceptive deity, an evil demon, who designed a false reality to deceive the
people inside of it.
Descartes’s demon was later refined into a philosophical thought experiment called
the Brain in a Vat.
Say your brain is removed from your body and placed into a vat of liquid.
Inside that vat, your brain is connected to a computer, which sends your nerve cells the
same impulses they would experience inside your body.
From the perspective of your brain, how would you know whether your experiences are real
or simulated?
Let’s compare this thought experiment to a real-life scenario.
Imagine, for a moment, you’ve stepped into a virtual reality game.
After slipping on your 3D glasses, your senses sink into the dark and dusty halls of a creepy,
old mansion.
As you wander through its shadowy corridors, your ears are prickled by the creaking of
floorboards.
Distant voices send chills down your spine, and you experience a genuine sense of terror.
It looks real.
It sounds real.
It may even feel real.
But does that make it real?
That’s a difficult question to answer.
You’re suspending your disbelief, but only temporarily.
You haven’t mistaken that haunted mansion for your real life.
No matter how realistic it looks, you know, in the back of your mind, that it is not real.
Currently, designers can create interesting 3D spaces that fool our senses, but the illusion
is easily broken.
You know too much to confuse the real world with a virtual one.
If you know you can escape from a simulated world, that realization influences your behavior.
…Even if your emotions are genuine, they’re not exactly real.
Some scientists disagree with this idea.
They claim that an escape path will not change your behavior if the illusion is strong enough…
Let’s go back to our haunted house.
Imagine, as you’re walking down the halls, a monster leaps out of the shadows.
You get scared, and you take off your headset.
You’ve escaped the virtual environment, but how do you feel?...
Your heart races in your chest.
Your respiratory rate climbs higher.
After coming back to reality, it takes your brain a few moments to understand exactly
what’s happening.
Your brain was deceived by that fabricated world.
It wasn’t permanent, but, for a few minutes, your sense of reality was broken.
Could VR create a permanent, deceptive experience?
Could your brain forget which reality is which?
Instead of viewing one space as real and the other as fake, your brain may equate the two
environments as distinct but equal realities.
Let’s accelerate 500 years into the future.
Now, virtual reality is a staple of modern living.
Clunky headsets have given way to sleek eyeglasses, which effortlessly transform the world around
you.
With the press of a button, your reality jumps from one realistic environment to another.
At first, these sensory stimuli feel like any other game; but what if virtual stimuli
become integrated into our daily lives?
People may forgo their real lives in favor of a simulated existence…Knowledge is power,
but your senses are ultimately fallible…
They can be fooled, and they do make mistakes.
A virtual universe could hypothetically merge with our reality, and our brains may forget
how to tell the difference.
This timeline sounds a lot like science fiction, doesn’t it?
It is speculation, but the future of VR gives our grand conspiracy a sturdy, conceptual
backbone.
But one outstanding hurdle remains: you can still take your glasses off.
At any point, you can flip a switch, power down, and return to your real life.
In this universe—the reality you’re inhabiting right now—that’s not an option.
Assuming our grand conspiracy theory is correct, how can a simulated reality exist without
our knowledge?
For a simulation to be totally convincing, it has to satisfy a set of objectives.
First and foremost, it must be perceptually spellbinding.
The fake environment must completely deceive the brain.
If the brain does not believe your environment is “real,” the simulation will be compromised
immediately.
There are two methods by which a simulated reality could deceive the brain.
Like the brain in a vat experiment, you could separate the body and mind, immersing your
consciousness into a false universe.
Your body would stay in reality, while your mind is unknowingly displaced into a simulated
world.
That’s one method, but there’s another option.
Your entire being—including your body and your mind—could be created within the simulation.
In this case, everything in the world—every atom, every force, every natural law—would
not exist in reality.
Keeping these two methods in mind, is it possible to create a simulated universe that completely
deceives the brain?
You could have entered into a simulation the moment you were born.
Once your life ends, you may wake up somewhere with a pair of glasses on your face, slowly
remembering what your real life was really like.
This explanation is interesting to think about, but others are far more plausible.
A better explanation comes from Nick Bostrom, an Oxford philosopher.
He says the history of humanity could be an ancestral simulation run by a post-human species.
In his famous essay, Bostrom laid out three potential conclusions.
According to Bostrom, one and only one of these conclusions will prove true sometime
in the distant future.
First, humanity could go extinct before entering a post-human state.
If our species dies out, we stand no chance of progressing into a post-human society.
Therefore, the probability of fabricating an artificial reality becomes approximately
zero.
In other words, we’re not living in a simulation.
Let’s assume humans do survive long enough to evolve into a post-human state.
If that happens, post-humans may not be interested in running ancestral simulations.
It’s possible a post-human society will disregard their past or simply abandon VR
technology.
If this were true, we can draw the same conclusion: we’re not living in a simulation.
What if humans do progress into a post-human state and post-humans are interested in running
ancestral simulations?
…In that case, it’s very likely our present universe is a simulation—one of thousands
of similar timelines investigated by a superior species.
Our universe may be the only one where dinosaurs were annihilated by a meteor strike.
Or the universe where Mount Vesuvius erupted over the city of Pompeii…
If Bostrom’s simulation theory were true, our reality is nothing but a small piece of
a post-human experiment.
This theory, like many others, makes a lot of assumptions.
It assumes that post-humans will, at some point, create new realities and that we will
populate those realities with conscious entities.
But is this technological leap even possible?
We don’t know for sure.
Artificial intelligence is still a bit of a mystery.
If we can create a functioning AI, we could place multiple artificial beings in a simulated
environment.
We could generate a fabricated universe that could mimic the evolution of our own.
No matter how convincing these arguments sound, they’re educated guesses about the future
of our reality.
Harvard physicist Lisa Randall says there’s no evidence to support any theory that we’re
living in a simulation.
At this stage in human evolution, we don’t have the knowledge or the technology to know
anything for sure.
It’s like arguing for the existence of artificial intelligence or independent consciousness.
It’s a compelling concept.
It transforms the way we think about life, perception, and the state of our universe,
but it will always be hypothetical until we find some concrete proof.
Let’s ignore all those plot holes for a moment.
Let’s assume that the entire universe is one big simulation.
Every sky-high building, every beautiful sunset, every traffic jam… it’s all just a bundle
of data.
Could you ever wake up from that simulation?
Is there a way out?
Probably not.
You’re stuck inside your simulated reality the same way a character is stuck inside their
fictional universe.
If that character realized they were inside a game, they couldn’t suddenly jump into
the real world.
They wouldn’t pop out of the screen and suddenly live a normal life.
Whether this universe is simulated or not, your reality is likely the only one you will
ever know.