Netflix's latest original feature, starring Thor himself, Chris Hemsworth, alongside Bollywood
sensation Randeep Hooda, is about as high-octane a thriller as any action fan could hope for.
Through all the captivating action sequences and frenetic fight scenes, Extraction actually
manages to tell a pretty complex story with an ambiguous ending that has fans abuzz with
theories.
Extraction follows protagonist Tyler Rake, a former member of the Australian Special
Air Service Regiment now working as an off-the-books mercenary.
At the film's outset, he's engaged by fellow killer-for-hire Nik Khan to rescue the son
of India's leading drug kingpin, who is currently being held for an exorbitant ransom by rival
Bangladeshi drug lord Amir Asif.
A hiccup during Rake's attempted "extraction" of his target brings down the wrath of Saju,
another former special operative currently in the employ of the Bangladeshi drug lord.
Rake and Saju engage in a complex game of cat and mouse…
"Ovi, it's Saju!
I'm here to take you home!"
"Saju!
I'm here!"
"Sit down and shut up!"
But they ultimately end up working together to outwit the authorities on their tails.
As far as action-thriller set-ups go, it's about as compelling as they come, but viewers
hoping for a clear-cut resolution that sees charismatic anti-hero Rake victoriously walking
away from an explosion in slow motion were left with a real head scratcher.
Let's break Extraction's ambiguous ending down with a little help from the film's director,
Sam Hargrave.
At the beginning of the film, shark-eyed mercenary Tyler Rake has an obvious death wish.
His ambivalence toward his own continued survival is a big part of what makes him such a deadly
merc.
We learn that much of Rake's nihilism stems from the death of his son, a loss that still
haunts him.
It's his relationship with Ovi, his target for extraction, that ultimately saves Rake
from himself.
As Rake begins to form a bond with Ovi, he no longer sees the drug heir as a simple job,
but rather a kid whose life has become more important than his own.
"Can I ask you something?"
"It's Rake."
"What's Rake?"
"My last name."
By the time the film reaches its climactic shootout on the bridge, Rake takes a mortal
wound to ensure Ovi's safe escape.
This emotional beat lands because we actually believe that Rake no longer wants to die,
but has chosen to give up his life to save Ovi's.
So Rake gets to go to his grave feeling like he redeemed his soul, while Ovi lives to fight
another day.
Satisfying ending, right?
Not so fast.
After Ovi's daring escape, the film presents a very unexpected coda.
In the final moments of Extraction, Ovi jumps into a peaceful swimming pool, a mirror image
of Rake's first scene jumping off a cliff.
When he comes up for air, he sees a blurry figure standing in the background who bears
a striking resemblance to Rake, but the film ends before we get any actual confirmation.
So, what gives?
As it turns out, Extraction's final moments were left open to interpretation by design.
Hargrave weighed in on the mystery surrounding this final scene.
He told Collider:
"We had a version of the movie, and we tested it a lot, and it was not surprising that a
lot of people wanted the character to live, and some people wanted him to die...If people
on one hand feel like the story is complete and is a story of redemption through sacrifice,
then for them, it'll be where the kid is imagining [Rake standing there], and then now you go,
'Yes, I'm satisfied.'"
Hargrave went on to explain, quote, "If you feel like you love Tyler Rake, and you love
Chris Hemsworth, and you want a sequel, and you're like 'There's no way, you can't kill
him!' then that's Tyler Rake standing there looking at you.
So we kind of purposefully did not pull focus to the character standing there."
For fans looking for a little more closure, Hargrave shared that the original screenplay
for Extraction included a much more definitive ending.
In screenwriter Joe Russo's intended story, Tyler Rake very explicitly dies on the bridge,
completing the character arc he started when he dove off that cliff in the initial scene.
Hargrave told Collider that the test audiences weren't crazy about the sacrifice, however.
He dished:
"People were torn; it was almost down the middle.
We want to appeal to as many people as possible without compromising the integrity of the
story.
And so, we think a pretty good compromise is to make an ambiguous ending."
Hargrave ultimately admitted that he prefers to imagine that Rake is dead by the film's
conclusion, claiming that he felt as though Rake had redeemed himself through sacrifice.
For fans in desperate need of finality, that's probably the best you're going to get.
The rest of us will have to learn to live with the ambiguity, at least until we get
an Extraction 2.
Check out one of our newest videos right here!
Plus, even more Looper videos about your favorite stuff are coming soon.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel and hit the bell so you don't miss a single one.