On Tuesday, July 30th, NASA announced 19 different partnerships with 13 different companies to
use their expertise to help them develop space technologies, from advanced communications
systems to new methods of entry, descent and landing.
Instead of contracting out specific projects, NASA will make its employees, facilities,
hardware and software available to these companies, for free.
One of the most notable of these partnerships will be with SpaceX and NASA’s Glenn and
Marshall Centers to help advance the technology of transferring propellant in orbit.
In other words, NASA is going to help SpaceX figure out how to refuel a spacecraft while
it’s in space.
And if they can figure this out, it could completely change the way missions are launched
and flown.
Think about the way a modern rocket mission is flown.
The rocket is filled up with all the propellant it’s going to need for its journey.
The first stage, second stage, etc, each of these contain propellant tanks filled with
rocket fuel.
These lower stages are discarded, and once the upper stages get to orbit, the rest of
the spacecraft has to complete its mission with whatever propellant it has left on board.
In fact, the Saturn V and the Space Launch System are so enormous because they need to
carry all this propellent, in all these different tanks.
NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft weighed less than a tonne, but it required the largest
Atlas rocket with 5 strap-on solid rocket boosters to get the velocity it needed to
make the journey to Pluto.
There are many fascinating missions in the planning stages, an orbital mission to Neptune,
the LUVOIR space telescope, but these will require the upgraded Block II version of the
Space Launch System, capable of launching 130 tonnes into low Earth orbit.
And we’ve been waiting a long time for the first Space Launch System rocket to fly at
all.
Imaging going on a road trip, and needing to fill your car with all the fuel you’ll
need for the entire trip.
It doesn’t make sense.
You stop and refuel your car, that makes sense.
Thanks to SpaceX, and its boosters that return to Earth and land under their own propulsion,
it’s clear that the future is reusable, and that means that orbital refueling can
become a reality.
The SpaceX Starship, formerly known as the BFR, will depend on orbital refueling to complete
many of its missions.
Once developed, the Starship will consist of two stages.
There’s the first stage, which is now called the Super Heavy.
This is the equivalent of the Falcon-9’s first stage.
This stage will be 63 meters long and 9 meters in diameter.
It’ll have a total mass of over 3,000 tonnes, built out of stainless steel, with fuel tanks
of liquid methane and oxygen.
It’ll be powered by 35 Raptor engines, fueled by methane.
Everyday Astronaut has done a fascinating video about the Raptor, and why it’ll be
such a revolutionary engine, and I’ll put a link to his video here.
Just like the Falcon-9, the Super Heavy will get the whole stack off the ground, detach
from the upper stage and then return to Earth, ideally landing on its launch pad again, ready
for another flight.
The upper stage Starship will be 55 meters tall and have several different configurations.
There’ll be a version that takes humans to Mars or the Moon.
And a cargo version that will launch satellites into various orbits.
And there will be a tanker version that does nothing but carry tonnes propellant to orbit,
to refuel Starships for their various missions.
According to SpaceX, one, two and even five of these tanker Starships could launch to
orbit to completely refill a Starship’s fuel tanks with more methane and oxygen.
With one tankers’s worth of fuel, a Starship could travel to the Moon, land on the surface,
and then return to Earth.
Completely fuel its propellant tanks with 5 refills, and you could carry hundreds of
tonnes of people, equipment and supplies to Mars, not to mention enormous interplanetary
robotic spacecraft that could seriously explore other worlds.
These missions will depend on being able to safely transfer fuels in the difficult environment
of space.
That’s why NASA’s help will be so valuable.
For all the missions that have flown to space, and the number of times that spacecraft have
docked with each other, orbital refueling isn’t much of a consideration.
It’s most commonly done today with the Russian Progress spacecraft which docks with and resupplies
the International Space Station.
This is based on technology the Russians developed to keep their Mir space station refueled.
Each Progress M1 Refueling Module has eight propellant tanks on board, which can carry
1,740 kilograms of fuel and oxidizer.
When it docks with the International Space Station, the Progress transfers the fuel and
oxidizer to the Space Station’s propulsion system through fluid connectors in the docking
ring.
NASA has also gotten even more complicated, testing out the equivalent of a full-service
gas station in orbit.
The Robotic Refueling Mission is a multi-phase test carried out using the International Space
Station as a platform to test out refueling and satellite servicing methods.
The RRM consists of a washing machine-sized box with all hardware that would be used as
part of a refueling procedure.
The station’s robotic arm demonstrated that it could act as an orbital service station
attendant, peeling back protective thermal blankets, unscrewing caps, turning valves,
and transferring fluid.
In other words, NASA has already tested out many of the technologies that SpaceX would
need to make their orbital refueling ideas a reality.
They’re providing all this hardware and expertise for free as part of this new agreement.
In turns out, United Launch Alliance has been pushing for this idea for a while with a system
that would enable orbital refueling at a huge scale, and we’ll get to that in a second,
but first I’d like to thank:
John Richards Isaac Carroll
James Miller Kevin Arbutha
And the rest of our 798 patrons for their generous support.
They contribute so that you can see these videos, and we can make them freely available
to anyone who wants to learn about space.
Join our community at patreon.com/universetoday and get in on the action.
In 2010, Frank Zegler and Bernard Kutter from United Launch Alliance presented their ambitious
plans to develop an orbital propellant depot at the AIAA Space 2010 conference in Anaheim
California.
According to their calculations, 70% of the mass that actually makes it to low-Earth orbit
is simply propellant.
Unlike the complex hardware for keeping humans alive, deploying robots or powering a spacecraft,
we’re talking about pressure vessels containing rocket fuel.
This is the simplest cargo that could be carried to orbit, and should be a commodity at this
point.
The problem is that the technology hasn’t been developed to receive, store and then
provide these propellants to other spacecraft when they need them.
According to Zegler and Kutter, the thinking had been that these orbital depots would need
to be enormous, International Space Station-scale structures built by many launches and assembled
in space by robots or astronauts.
But they proposed that depots could actually be much smaller.
The key is to use them.
Keep the fuel flowing.
The total capacity of a refueling depot might be 120 tonnes of propellant, but it could
provide over 300 tonnes to various missions over the course of a year.
A low-Earth orbit fuel depot would be helpful.
An even better place might be the Earth-Moon L2 Lagrange point.
This is a region of stability located about 60,000 kilometers beyond the Moon.
From this point, it only takes a little bit of fuel to completely escape Earth orbit.
In order to travel to Mars from low Earth orbit, spacecraft need to acquire a change
in velocity of 4.3 km/s.
But to go from the L2 point, they’d only about 1 km/s.
This means dramatically less propellant.
More hardware, people and cargo can be carried to the Red Planet.
Imagine a mission where a rocket blasts off from Earth, and then the upper stage flies
to the Earth-Moon L2 Lagrange point.
It refuels at the supply depot and now has the propellant it needs to carry a huge payload
to Mars.
No massive new rockets required.
There are challenges, of course.
Liquid hydrogen and oxygen need to be kept at incredibly cold temperatures, or they’ll
evaporate because of the heat from the Sun and Earth.
But block the light of the Sun with a sunshade, and you can reduce those boil-off rates to
essentially zero.
United Launch Alliance proposed the Advanced Common Evolved Stage, or ACES based on technology
developed a few years earlier by Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
Each ACES upper stage would contain twice the propellant of a traditional Centaur upper
stage booster - 41 metric tonnes of fuel.
And a stretched version would have 73 tonnes on board.
The fuel depot itself would consist of two of these upper stages mated together, with
a sunshield to protect it from the heat of the Sun.
Then bulk propellant could be launched to the depot in 26 tonne increments, filling
it up and providing the fuel storage for future missions.
ULA proposed a test for the ACES system in 2011 that would have cost less than $100 million,
but political issues snared up the program, delaying any further development.
I’m going to provide a link to a fascinating story from Eric Berger at Ars Technica that
shows some of the political machinations that went on behind the scenes, delaying the development
of the ACES system.
Which is too bad, because it’s clearly the future.
It’s only now that SpaceX is seriously considering orbital refueling, and this technology could
have been a decade ahead.
In a recent interview with Ars Technica, ULA president Tory Bruno said that the development
of ACES is still on the roadmap, but it’ll happen after their next generation Vulcan
rocket flies.
So that’ll be years.
Orbital refueling is going to be the future.
Heavy launch vehicles like the Saturn V and Space Launch System are complicated and expensive.
It makes a lot more sense to settle on smaller, more reusable spacecraft, and then use space-based
refueling to take them where they want to go.
The technology has been tested on a small scale, but it’s clearly time to take things
to the next level.
As we expand out into the Solar System, it makes sense to build up the infrastructure
to support our exploration.
Into the future, we can expect to see fuel depots scattered across the Solar System,
ready to provide propellant for missions traveling from world to world.
What do you think?
Does it make more sense to refuel rockets in orbit?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
Once a week I gather up all my space news into a single email newsletter and send it
out.
It’s got pictures, brief highlights about the story, and links so you can find out more.
Go to universetoday.com/newsletter to sign up.
Did you know that all of my videos are also available in a handy audio podcast format,
so you can have the latest episodes as well as special bonus material like interviews
with me show up right on your audio device.
Go to universetoday.com/audio, or search for Universe Today on iTunes, Spotify or wherever
you get your podcasts.
I’ll put a link in the shownotes.
And finally, here’s a playlist.