>> THERE IS A NEW WRINKLE IN THE O.J.
SIMPSON CASE.
IT TURNS OUT THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE UNCOVERED.
A CONSTRUCTION WORKER FOUND THIS EVIDENCE DURING THE
DEMOLITION OF O.J.
SIMPSON'S HOME.
IT'S A KNIFE, AND SOME BELIEVE THAT THE KNIFE COULD HAVE
BLOOD RESIDUE ON IT.
POLICE ARE INVESTIGATING IN A TOP-SECRET INVESTIGATION.
LET ME GIVE YOU THE DETAILS.
TMZ IS REPORTING: THIS CONSTRUCTION WORKER GOES
OUTSIDE, SEES A GROUP OF COPS AND GIVES THE KNIFE TO A COP.
THE COP ON DUTY WAS TAKING CARE OF A MOVIE THAT WAS BEING
FILMED IN THE AREA.
THE COP DID THE WRONG THING, HE DIDN'T TURN IN THE
EVIDENCE, HE
KEPT IT.
YEARS LATER HE TALKS TO ANOTHER POLICE OFFICIAL, AT THIS
POINT HE IS ALREADY RETIRED.
SO HE TALKED TO HIS POLICE OFFICIAL ABOUT FRAMING THE
KNIFE, AND ANOTHER COP TURNED HIM IN.
>> THAT IS DOUBLE JEOPARDY, PART OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
YOU CAN'T BE TRIED FOR THE SAME CRIME TWICE.
SINCE OJ WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY, MAYBE IT HAS SOMEONE ELSE'S
BLOOD ON IT.
WRITE?
I WOULDN'T BET ON IT.
HE HAD 62 CASES OF
ATTACKING HIS WIFE BEFORE HE "DIDN'T KILL HER".
>>62?
I DIDN'T KNOW THAT.
>>IT IS UNBELIEVABLE.
IT WAS OJ AND HE WAS FAMOUS SO IT WAS COVERUP THIS,
COVER-UP THAT.
IT'S UNBELIEVABLE WHAT HE GOT AWAY WITH.
AND THEN YOU HAVE THIS JACKASS COP.
IT'S
IRONIC ONE OF THE REASONS THAT OJ GOT OFF, BECAUSE OF
THE INCOMPETENCE OF THE LAPD.
WATCHING THAT SERIES IS MAKING MY BLOOD BOIL AGAIN.
ONE, BECAUSE HE GOT OFF.
NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN MORE GUILTY THAN OJ WAS.
IF YOU ARE STILL HOLDING ON THAT HE IS NOT, YOU ARE WRONG.
SAD DAY FOR YOU.
SAD DAY FOR ALL OF US BECAUSE HE GOT AWAY WITH IT.
THE SECOND THING IS, MARK FUHRMAN SUED LOS ANGELES
FOR MAKING HIM A RACIST.
HE OPENLY ADMITTED HE WAS A RACIST, HE SUED SAYING MY
WORK AS A POLICE OFFICER MADE ME RACIST, SO YOU OWE ME MONEY.
WHAT AN INSANE LAWSUIT.
BUT THAT WAS BEFORE OJ.
THEY PUT HIM BACK ON THE FORCE, AND SEND OUT ANY TIME HE
GOES WITH A CASE THAT ACKNOWLEDGES BLACK PEOPLE THEY
WILL SAY THIS GUY IS A RACIST AND THEY WILL THROW EVIDENCE.
HOW DO PUT HIM BACK ON THE STREET TO DO MORE POLICING?
IT'S SO EASY FOR JOHNNY COCHRAN TO SAY THIS GUY IS A RACIST.
IT'S WORSE THAN STUPID BECAUSE IT GOES TO THE IDEOLOGY
WHICH IS, IT'S NOT THAT BIG A DEAL TO HAVE A RACIST COP.
DO YOU SEE WHAT I AM SAYING?
THIS GUY SAID IN OPEN COURT,"I AM A RACIST."
SOMETIMES THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO IS A GUILTY GUY
WHO CUT TO PEOPLE'S HEADS OFF WALKS BECAUSE OF IT.
GREAT JOB, GREAT WAY TO PURSUE JUSTICE.
>> I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO SAY.
THAT IS CRAZY.
>> YES, HAS STUPID IT WAS FOR THE COP TO DO THAT.
HIS THOUGHT PROCESS WAS STUPID.
HE SAID THERE IS NO WAY FOR HIM TO BE CONVICTED, BECAUSE HE
ALREADY GOT OFF, RIGHT?
SO THEN HE KEPT IT, AND BRAGGED ABOUT IT TO HIS FRIENDS FOR
THE REST OF HIS LIFE.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION.
LET'S SAY THAT A CASE HAPPENS, SOMEONE GETS PROSECUTED AND
THEY GET ACQUITTED.
BUT THEN LATER ON THERE IS NEW EVIDENCE THAT MIGHT
INDICATE THAT THIS PERSON ACTUALLY COMMITTED THE CRIME.
WE'RE REALLY NOT ALLOWED TO PROSECUTE THAT PERSON?
THAT IS INSANE.
>> NOT REALLY.
>> IF YOU DON'T HAVE DOUBLE JEOPARDY, THE GOVERNMENT
CAN CARESS YOU OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
>>I KNOW WHY THE PROTECTION IS IN CASE, BUT IF YOU HAVE
DNA EVIDENCE THAT SOMEONE COMMITTED THE CRIME THEN ñ
>>THE CONSTITUTION IS A VERY LIBERAL DOCUMENT.
AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS A TON OF RIGHTS.
>>BECAUSE THEY CAME FROM TYRANNICAL RULERS.
THEY KNEW WHAT IT WAS.
BOX WHEN I WAS IN LAW SCHOOL, I USED TO THINK I DON'T KNOW
THAT DEFENDANTS SHOULD HAVE ALL THESE RIGHTS.
IT'S IN THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE CONSTITUTION IS MORE
LIBERAL THAN I AM.
YEAH, I WANT TO SEE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY IF YOU ARE
CHARGED WITH A CRIME.
BUT THAT IS WHAT CONSERVATIVES DON'T GET, THE CONSTITUTION
IS MASSIVELY LIBERAL.
YES, ONE OF THE RATES IS PROSECUTION, IN ORDER THAT
WE DON'T HAVE A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT, THE BURDEN IS
ON THE GOVERNMENT TO PROVE THAT THIS GUY IS GUILTY BEYOND A
REASONABLE DOUBT, AND IF YOU SCREW IT UP YOU DON'T GET A
SECOND CHANCE.
BOY DID THEY SCREW IT UP WITH OJ.
>>YEAH THEY DID.