>> Brian: THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE FINALLY RESPONDING TO
THAT APPROACH AS SET
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HOMES
WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
MERRICK GARLAND PROMISING
VIOLENCE OR THREATS OF VIOLENCE
AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS WILL NOT
BE TOLERATED.
YOU CAN GO IN FRONT OF THEIR
HOUSE.
THREATS ARE LIKELY TO PERSIST
AND INCREASE WHEN ROE V. WADE IS
OFFICIALLY OVERTURNED.
SENATOR RAND PAUL IS NO STRANGER
TO HARASSMENT IN 2020.
AS YOU SEE RIGHT NOW BY MOBS
LEAVING THE RNC EVENT AT THE
WHITE HOUSE AFTER THREE YEARS
BEFORE THAT, HE WAS ATTACKED BY
HIS NEIGHBOR OVER YOUR DISPUTE.
SENATOR RAND PAUL JOINS US RIGHT
NOW.
WE THOUGHT WE WOULD BE THE
PERFECT PERSON TO TALK TO YOU
ABOUT THREATS.
DO YOU THINK MERRICK GARLAND IS
HANDLING THIS RIGHT?
>> AS SOMEONE WHO HAS
EXPERIENCED A LOT OF IT WHEN I
WAS MOBBED WITH MY WIFE BY OVER
100 PEOPLE, AND 6 GRAMS BROKEN
AND NOT POLITICALLY MOTIVATED
CURRENTLY ATTACKED FROM BEHIND.
HE WAS SHOT.
I HAVE BEEN THERE.
I’VE SEEN POLITICAL VIOLENCE UP
CLOSE.
THIS IS WHY IT IS NOT JUST A
BREACH OF DECORUM THAT THEY
LEAKED THIS DECISION EARLY.
THIS IS REALLY ABOUT SOMEBODY
INSTIGATING IN TRYING TO FOMENT
VIOLENCE.
I’M VERY CONCERNED ABOUT OUR
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
I AM AS STALWART DEFENDER OF THE
FIRST AMENDMENT AS ANYONE.
DISORDERLY CONDUCT IS NOT
PROTECTED BY THE
FIRST AMENDMENT.
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CHANTING
KEEP PEOPLE AWAKE ALL NIGHT IN
THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I THINK YOU ARE INVADING THEIR
PRIVACY INVADING THEIR PRIVATE
PROPERTY.
EVEN IF YOU STAND ON THE
SIDEWALK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A
RIGHT TO KEEP PEOPLE AWAKE ALL
NIGHT.
YOU SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR
DISORDERLY CONDUCT.
WHATEVER CLARK DID THIS OR
WHATEVER PERSON AT THE
SUPREME COURT DID THIS NOT ONLY
SHOULD THEY BE FIRED, I THINK
THEY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED AND
THEY SHOULD BE BARRED FROM
PRACTICING LAW.
THIS IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
>> Brian: WHAT DO YOU THINK
THAT IF MERRICK GARLAND WAS ON
THE SUPREME COURT AND HE HAD A
CONTROVERSIAL DECISION, DO YOU
THINK YOU WOULD BE COMFORTABLE
WITH SCREAMING OUTSIDE HIS
HOUSE?
>> PEOPLE HAVE TO REALIZE
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ARE
HUMAN BEINGS LIKE THE REST OF US
US.
HAVE HOUSES AND FAMILIES.
SOME OF THEM HAVE SMALL
CHILDREN.
I HAVE TALKED INDIRECTLY TO SOME
OF THEM WHO HAVE SAID THERE IS
CONCERN FOR THEIR FAMILY SAFETY.
THEIR KIDS CAN GO OUT INTO THE
YARD ALONE WITHOUT PEOPLE
WATCHING VERY CAREFULLY THAT
SOMEONE DOESN’T COME INTO THE
YARD.
THIS IS A BAD SITUATION.
PEOPLE NEED TO CALM DOWN.
I DON’T HATE DEMOCRATS.
I THOUGHT THE DEMOCRATS EVERY
DAY UP HERE.
I’M WITH DEMOCRATS ON THE OTHER
SIDE.
WE HAVE COMMON ISSUES AND A LOT
OF DIFFERENCES.
ALL THE HEAT THAT GOES ON ON THE
INTERNET IN THE BACK AND THAT WE
HAVE TO DO SOMETHING VIOLENT.
WE ARE NOT THAT WAY.
WE NEED TO SHOW THAT WE ARE
HUMAN BEINGS WITH DIFFERENCES
BUT WE AREN’T ALWAYS ANGRY.
WE ARE RARELY ANGRY AT EACH
OTHER.
>> Brian: A LOT OF THESE
GROUPS ARE BEING PAID IT TO GO
PROTEST.
THAT’S HOW THEY ARE CHOOSING TO
MAKE A LIVING.
WHEN WE WERE GOING TO HEAR?
BESIDES SITTING ON THE
SIDELINES, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU
CAN DO IN THE MINORITY TO FORCE
SOMEBODY TO INVESTIGATE THIS OR
GET AN UPDATE?
>> I THINK THE SUPREME COURT
ULTIMATELY HAS TO DO THIS.
THERE ARE FORENSIC WAYS TO
FIGURE OUT IT’S A VERY SMALL
GROUP OF PEOPLE.
I THINK WE MIGHT BE TALKING
ABOUT A DOZEN PEOPLE THAT WOULD
BE SUSPECTS IN THIS.
FRANKLY, THERE ARE TIMES WHEN I
THINK EMPLOYMENT COULD ASK FOR A
LIE DETECTOR TEST.
THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT THING
IN THE SUPREME COURT HOLDS IT.
I WOULD BRING ABOUT 12 PEOPLE
AND ASK ALL UNDER OATH AND WITH
THE LIE DETECTOR TEST, DID YOU
THINK THIS DOCUMENT?
THIS SHOULDN’T HAPPEN IN LIBERAL
OR CONSERVATIVE, WE DON’T WANT
VIOLENCE.
WE ALSO KNOW WHEN SOMEBODY
WORKING AT THE SUPREME COURT IS
A LIAR AND WHO IS DISHONEST.
>> THIS IS AN EPISODE OF "COLD
CASE.
I DON’T THINK THERE’S ANY
SINCERITY IT SEEMS TO GETTING TO
THE BOTTOM OF THIS.
THIS IS AN UNWILLINGNESS TO LET
YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHICH SIDE IT
CAME FROM.
I KNOW YOU HAVE A WAY OF GETTING
NOTICED WHEN YOU WANT TO MAKE
SOMETHING HAPPEN.
IF YOU COULD TRY TO GET TO THE