Electricity faces a fundamental problem that comes with pretty much any product that’s
provided on-demand: our ability to generate large amounts of it doesn’t match up that
closely with when we need it.
Wind and solar power are becoming more cost effective, but they’ll always be unreliable
and intermittent sources of energy.
Retailers use warehouses to store goods between manufacturer and sale.
Water utilities use tanks and reservoirs.
But the storage of electricity for later use, especially on a large scale, is quite a bit
more challenging.
That’s why power grids are mostly real time systems with generation ramped up or down
to meet fluctuating demands instantaneously.
That’s not to say that we don’t store energy at grid scale though, and there’s
one type of storage that makes up the vast majority of our current capacity.
Hey I’m Grady and this is Practical Engineering.
On today’s episode, we’re talking about pumped hydroelectric storage.
Although it’s a very convenient form of energy to produce, transmit, and use, electricity
has some disadvantages.
We’ve talked a little bit about variability in demand and generation capacity in previous
videos of this series, but I’ll summarize again here.
The fundamental problem is that we use electricity like this, with peaks in the morning and evening.
But, we generate electricity differently.
Fossil fuel and nuclear plants generally have a single capacity at which they run most efficiently
with occasional need to go offline for maintenance.
Solar, of course, follows the amount of sunlight with some variability due to clouds.
And wind follows weather patterns with potential for lots of variability.
You may have heard of the duck curve, which is the name given to our electricity demand
minus the contribution from solar.
You end up with this funky curve representing the need for other sources of electricity.
This creates a challenge because not only does solar power start to die away right when
we need it most during peak demands in the evening, it also creates a much steeper demand
curve, requiring grid operators to spin up other types of generation more quickly.
So, solar power is meeting some of our electricity needs, but it’s not necessarily eliminating
the need for other sources of electricity.
And in some cases, it may actually be making the grid less efficient by contributing to
instability and requiring the use of peaking plants that are generally heavier polluters.
In fact, peaking plants are the go-to solution for load following on the grid.
These are smaller, more expensive sources of electricity that only run for a few hours
per day to make up the difference between the base power load and the evening peaks.
Another interesting solution to this problem is called demand management, which is influencing
the demand for electricity to reduce or shift peaks and match generation capacity better.
This can be as simple as marketing campaigns encouraging you to set your thermostat a few
degrees higher to sophisticated systems that can tell your electric car when to start charging.
But, the holy grail in grid-scale power delivery is simply to let the demand and generation
curves be what they’ll be, storing energy when generation exceeds demand and using that
stored energy during demand peaks.
There are a wide variety of fascinating ideas for storing large amounts of energy, from
molten salt to pressurizing the air in old mines, but most of the current grid-scale
storage relies on gravitational potential.
That is: use excess energy to lift something up, then use that thing to generate electricity
as it falls back down, essentially treating earth’s gravity as a spring.
And the vast majority of current grid-scale storage does this using water, in a scheme
called pumped storage hydroelectricity.
And I’ve built a little mini-scale version of this as a demonstration.
In most cases, the way this works is to have two reservoirs nearby but separated by a large
difference in elevation, in this case two buckets separated by a ladder.
At night, when electricity prices are low, you use that cheap power and pumps to fill
the upper reservoir.
During the day, when energy prices are high, you use the water in the upper reservoir to
spin turbines and generate hydropower.
It’s essentially a giant water battery, and storing energy in this way has a lot of
benefits, besides just shaving off the peaks of the demand curve.
Hydropower is one of the most responsive ways to generate electricity, so pumped storage
allows grid operators to handle fluctuation in demands quickly.
Pumped storage is also valuable in an emergency, providing quick access to power when other
sources may be out of commission.
Finally, these systems can provide a lot of benefit on small, insular power grids (like
on islands) where you don’t have as much diversification in the generation portfolio.
But, pumped storage has several major challenges as well, and I’ll use this demo to illustrate
the big ones.
First is energy density, which is the term to describe how much energy can fit into a
unit volume.
And this is not a pumped storage facility’s finest feature.
Just for some reference here is the energy density of gasoline, a lithium ion battery,
and the water in a typical pumped storage reservoir.
I say typical because but the total energy storage is both a function of height and volume.
The greater the head above the turbines, the more the generating capacity for a given volume
of water.
I’m using a little aquarium pump to fill up my upper reservoir on top of this ladder.
It’s pretty easy to see the difference in energy density between a battery and the stored
water.
The water in this bucket has about the same gravitational potential energy as the battery
in your car’s key fob.
In fact, to reach the same density as a typical lithium-ion battery, you’d have to have
the water stored at a height of approximately outside earth’s atmosphere, which wouldn’t
be very convenient for an electric vehicle.
In fact, this is one of the main disadvantages of pumped storage facilities is that they
require a very specific type of site where you can locate two pools near each other while
also separating them by as much vertical distance as possible.
And even then, because of the low energy density, these are often massive reservoirs that are
major civil engineering projects as compared to something like a battery that can be manufactured
in a factory.
The other major challenge of pumped storage is getting the energy back out once you’ve
stored it.
Efficiency is the ratio of how much energy you put in versus how much of it you can get
out.
You never get it all.
That’s the second law of thermodynamics.
But you hope to get most of it, otherwise you’ve built a very big and very expensive
battery that doesn’t work.
As I mentioned, my model reservoir is holding about a tenth of a watt-hour, but that’s
not how much energy it took to get it there.
I kept an eye on the power supply while the bucket filled, and it took about 0.7 watt-hours
of electricity.
That means my pump’s efficiency was about 15%.
So, the most energy I can even hope to recover is a lot less than I’ve put in.
Some pumped storage facilities can use reversible pumps that act as turbines, but in my case
I’m using a dedicated unit.
I’ve got a power resistor as dummy loads, and I’m measuring the voltage and current
produced by the turbine to estimate the total recovery of energy.
And… the numbers don’t look good.
In fact, with the small amount of pressure, my little mini hydro turbine could barely
even spin at all.
My best estimate is that I was able to generate 2 milliwatt-hours from the full bucket.
That’s a whopping 0.3% efficiency and this is the other reason we’re not hooking up
tanks of water to our portable electronic devices.
At a small scale, this just isn’t a feasible way to store power.
Little pumps and turbines just aren’t very efficient.
But things look a little better on a larger scale.
Even considering all the potential losses of energy from evaporation or leakage of water
to friction and turbulence within the machinery, many pumped storage facilities achieve efficiencies
of 70 percent and higher.
Of course that means they are net energy consumers, since (as we mentioned) you can’t recover
all the power used to pump the water to the top, but if the cost of the energy consumed
is lower than the price they can get out of that energy (minus inefficiencies) during
peak demand, they can still turn a profit.
In fact, you might be surprised how many pumped storage facilities already exist.
In the U.S. the Energy Information Administration has a nice online map where you can look around
and see if there’s one near that you can go visit.
Of course, I’ve only had time to go into the basics of pumped storage, and there are
a lot of interesting advancements on the horizon, like using abundantly available seawater instead
of sometimes limited sources of freshwater.
Like demand management, storage is just one part of improving the efficiency and stability
of the power grid as we work to implement more renewable and sustainable sources of
electricity.