Hello and welcome to this programme where we focus on Huawei. How did Huawei move in the right
direction in the process of forced transformation, and how did its technology level become
self-reliant?China's Huawei, as the world's only 5G terminal service high-tech Internet enterprise,
its technology has always been in the forefront of the world or even the world's first. At the same
time, The 5G chip technology developed by Huawei is a leading technology enterprise in the world,
and the APPLICATION and registration of 5G patent technology are the first in the world. The United
States felt a great threat and kept imposing sanctions on Huawei to suppress its scientific
and technological development. It even used administrative policies to control huawei,
which had a great impact on its business in the United States.
The UK had previously allowed Huawei to enter the local market, but it suddenly "changed"
soon afterwards, not only requiring local operators to dismantle all Huawei's 5G equipment,
but also prohibiting Huawei from participating in the UK's 5G network construction. Based on
the pressure exerted by the United States, the United Kingdom stated that it will "zero
out" Huawei's 5G equipment within three years. In addition to the United Kingdom, Australia
and other countries have successively excluded Huawei's 5G technology and equipment. Facing those
countries that gave up Huawei's 5G technology and equipment, Huawei chose to fight back.
Huawei chose to fight back and sued the Swedish National Post and Telecommunications Agency.
Today, all of Huawei's investments in Australia have been withdrawn. In response to the unprovoked
suppression by the United States, Huawei initiated a patent lawsuit against local operators,
demanding US operators to pay US$1 billion in patent fees. However, the target of Huawei's
counterattack is Sweden. Sweden officially announced that Huawei is forbidden to participate
in the construction of local 5G communication networks, and Huawei and other domestic
enterprises are excluded. For this policy issued by the Swedish government, domestic companies
such as Huawei and ZTE clearly oppose it. Ericsson from Sweden also expressed great
opposition, believing that Chinese companies should be supported to participate in local 5G
network construction. In response to Sweden's prohibition of Huawei from participating in the
construction of the local 5G network, Huawei responded by suing the Swedish National Post
and Telecommunications Bureau through legal weapons, thereby safeguarding its legal rights.
Although Huawei's lawsuit ended in failure, Huawei did not choose to give up,
but insisted on appealing resolutely. Regarding the failure of Huawei's prosecution,
Huawei's lawyers said: There are many problems with the Swedish Administrative Court's judgment,
which are mainly reflected in the following two points.
First: Without in-depth investigation and analysis, the Swedish court made a
decision directly based on the guesswork of the Swedish National Security Agency.
Second: According to the analysis of legal procedures, the decision made by PTS is obviously
inconsistent with Swedish law and EU law. Huawei will not abandon 5G construction in Sweden,
and Swedish companies will be most affected. Regarding the wrong judgment made by the Swedish
court, Huawei said: If Huawei's interpretation of EU law cannot be approved by the Court of Appeal,
the Court of Appeal shall make a preliminary judgment in accordance
with the law of the European Court of Justice. In short, Huawei will never give up participating in
the construction of Sweden's 5G network, and will insist on safeguarding its legal rights through
legal weapons. In fact, Sweden restricts Huawei's participation in local 5G network construction,
and it is Swedish companies such as Ericsson that are most affected, not Huawei.
It is worth mentioning that my country is the world's largest 5G network market,
and only 2 trillion yuan has been invested in the construction of 5G communication networks.
As one of the world's four major manufacturers that can independently build 5G networks, although
Ericsson's 5G technology has a certain gap with Huawei, it is very dependent on the domestic
market. Therefore, when Sweden restricted Huawei and other Chinese companies from participating
in the local 5G network construction, Ericsson immediately stood up and opposed it. However,
Ericsson was ultimately affected. Canada and Brazil have changed their
attitudes towards Huawei's 5G and support Huawei's 5G construction.
According to the results of the 5G bidding, domestic companies such as Huawei and ZTE
basically won the 5G orders from the three major operators, while Ericsson's pellets were not
received. Faced with this situation, Ericsson decided to abandon the R&D center and began to
develop an in-depth layout in the domestic 5G market. At present, many countries have
changed their attitudes towards Huawei's 5G construction. Canada, which explicitly
prohibited local operators from launching 5G cooperation with Huawei, said that it would
publicly support Huawei's participation in local 5G network construction in the near future.
Canada's change of attitude actually has something else hidden. This is a way that the United States
has used its allies to escalate and suppress Huawei. The United States has not only created
rumors that Huawei equipment has hidden security risks, but has also lobbied Western countries to
reject Huawei's 5G construction on many occasions. The United States has targeted Huawei in this way
to hinder my country's cooperation with other countries. As far as the United States is
concerned, as long as it has the right to speak in the 5G network, it can lead the world in
economic and military aspects, so 5G technology can definitely bring about a huge impact.
However, Huawei has taken the lead in breaking through 5G technology.
Even if Canada chooses to cooperate with Ericsson or Nokia, it may not be able to get rid of its
dependence on Huawei's 5G patents. Because the 5G equipment and technology of Ericsson and Nokia
are not mature enough, Canada still depends on Huawei's 5G technology and equipment.
In addition to Canada's change in attitude towards Huawei's 5G, Brazil clearly expressed
its support for Huawei, ZTE and other domestic companies to jointly build local 5G networks.
Brazil will face huge losses if it rejects Huawei equipment.
Canada, Brazil and other countries have changed their attitudes towards Huawei's 5G,
indicating that they have already assumed that Huawei's 5G technology is leading the world.
It is worth mentioning that Huawei's 3G and 4G equipment has a market share of more than 40%
in Brazil, and most of the equipment of Brazilian telecom operators comes from Huawei.
If Brazil excludes Huawei, it will need to dismantle all of Huawei's 3G and 4G equipment,
which will cause huge losses at that time. The Brazilian President allowed Huawei to
participate in 5G network construction mainly for the following three reasons. First,
rejecting Huawei may cause Brazil to lose billions of dollars.
Second, the United States, which cannot occupy a leading position in 5G,
is about to lose its right to speak. Third, Huawei has a great competitive advantage in price.
Huawei 5G has no security risks, reflecting Ren Zhengfei's three intentions.
Canada, Brazil and other countries have changed their attitudes towards Huawei's 5G.
On the one hand, Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Ren Zhengfei, returned to the motherland. This
shows that Huawei's 5G technology and equipment have no security risks; on the one hand, it is to
provide better 5G services. , And equipped with Huawei 5G technology and equipment can save the
cost and time of 5G network construction. The counterattack against Sweden has an
extraordinary meaning for Huawei, and it reflects Ren Zhengfei's three intentions from the side.
First: Based on the continuous suppression of the United States, Huawei's 5G market share in
the European market has been declining. However, the Swedish market may become a new breakthrough
for Huawei in Europe. Therefore, it has become the first choice for Huawei to continue its deployment
in the European market. After all, Ericsson has previously stated that it supports Huawei's entry
into the Swedish and European markets. With the help of Ericsson, Huawei may
be able to restore the European 5G market. Second: Sweden's suppression of Huawei is the
fiercest among all European countries. Therefore, Huawei's counterattack this
time is to show its attitude: Huawei will never easily give up the deployment of 5G
technology in the global market. As far as Ren Zhengfei is concerned, whether or not Huawei's
prosecution against Sweden can be successful is to show Huawei's firm attitude to the world.
Third: As long as Huawei successfully expands its layout in the 5G market in Sweden,
it can lay the foundation for the future development of Huawei's 5G, which may be the
prelude to the European 5G competition. Only 50 cities in Europe have 5G enabled,
and Sweden should recognize the reality. In contrast to Huawei's 5G construction,
my country is currently at least two years ahead of Europe in 5G construction.
According to statistics, 5G has been opened in 376 cities in my country,
284 cities in the United States have 5G networks, and only 50 cities in Europe have 5G networks.
Compared with Huawei, Ericsson is facing greater losses, which is also the result of the Swedish
government restricting Huawei's participation in 5G construction. If only relying on Ericsson
and Nokia, the European 5G network construction may not be realized. so! Sweden should recognize
the reality, support Huawei's participation in Sweden's 5G network construction, and get rid
of its dependence on the United States. After all, Huawei has a huge Chinese market as its backbone,
so it is basically impossible for the United States to completely defeat Huawei.
In response to the Swedish government's rejection of Huawei's 5G construction, Huawei has made a
counterattack. Although the prosecution failed, Huawei did not give up and has always used legal
weapons to safeguard its cooperation rights and interests. However, the Swedish government
should recognize the reality, because it is not Huawei that is most affected, but Ericsson.
Do you have any views on Huawei's counterattack? Thank you for watching today's video.
We will be much appreciating if you subscribe our channel and give us a thumb.