If there is one generalisation to hazard about maturity, it is that it involves neither profoundly
idealising, nor denigrating other people.
But let’s begin with babies.
The pioneering mid-20th century Viennese psychoanalyst Melanie Klein famously drew attention to something
very dramatic that happens in the minds of babies during feeding sessions with their
mothers.
Image result for marie cassatt When feeding goes well, the baby is blissfully happy and
sees mummy as ‘good’.
But if, for whatever reason, the feeding process is difficult, the baby can’t grasp that
it is dealing with the same person it liked a lot only a few hours or minutes ago.
It is simply filled with rage and hatred.
In order to tolerate this, the baby splits off from the actual mother a second ‘bad’
version – whom it deems to be a separate, hateful individual, responsible for deliberately
frustrating its wishes, and in the process, protecting the image of the good mother in
its mind.
There are, in the baby’s mind, two people at large, one entirely good, the other entirely
bad.
Gradually, if things go well, there follows a long and difficult process by which the
child integrates these two different people and comes, sadly but realistically, to grasp
that there is no ideal, ‘perfect’ mummy – just one person who is usually lovely
but can also be cross, busy, tired, who can make mistakes, and be very interested in other
people.
It may be a very long time since we were being fed as babies.
But the tendency to ‘split’ those close to us is always there; for we don’t ever
fully outgrow our childhood selves.
In adult life, we may fall deeply in love and split off an ideal version of someone,
in whom we see no imperfections and whom we adore without limit.
Yet we may suddenly and violently turn against the partner (or a celebrity or a politician)
whose good qualities once impressed us, the moment we discover the slightest thing that
disturbs or frustrates us in them.
We may conclude that they cannot really be good since they have made us suffer – and
that the only logical verdict is that they are appalling.
We may find it extremely hard to accept that the same person might be very nice and good
in some ways and strikingly disappointing in others.
The bad version can appear to destroy the good one, though (of course) in fact these
are really just different and connected aspects of one complex person.
It’s a huge psychological achievement to accept other humans in their bewildering mixture
of good and bad, capacity to assist us and to frustrate us, kindness and meanness – and
to see that, far more than we’re inclined to imagine in our furious or ecstatic moments,
most people belong in that slightly sobering, slightly hopeful grey area that goes by the
term ‘good enough.’
To cope with the conflict between hope and reality, our culture should teach us good
integration skills, prompting us to accept with a little more grace what is imperfect
in ourselves – and then, by extension, in others.
We should be gently reminded that no one we can love will ever satisfy us completely – but
that this is never a reason to hate them either.
We should move away from the naivety and cruelty of splitting people into the camps of the
awful and the wondrous, to the mature wisdom of integrating them into the large collective
of the ‘good enough’.
Our collection of essays, "Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person" proposes that we don't need
perfection to be happy, as long as we enter our relationships in the right spirit.
Find out more by following the link on your screen now.