A former executive is blowing the whistle on how bad security is at Twitter among other
problems. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins joins me now to talk about what's happening. Farron,
I say it all the time, I don't know anybody in the progressive news business better than you. You've
followed this story from the very beginning. It's, it's, it's unfolding to be like a Greek tragedy.
It's so crazy. Right.
So, so now all this new information about coverup, there's no question,
it's, it's on the edge of fraud. You can at least suggest that it looks like fraud. Started
out where Musk says, well, yeah, I'll take the, whatever you got. If you've got bots in there,
I understand that. But then the whistleblower comes back and says
it's a lot worse than what they were telling you. Yeah. There's, you know, really two major avenues
of what this whistleblower has revealed. The first which we touched on last week of course,
was the fact that there is basically no security at Twitter. Your account
is not secure. Barack Obama's account has been hacked. Joe Biden's account has been hacked.
Mm-hmm. You're not safe on
Twitter is what this whistleblower is telling us. But then the other part, the one that has
real legal ramifications here is that this outlet Twitter is still lying about how many bots and
spam accounts are all over this website, which of course directly impacts and, and bolsters
Elon Musk's case that he shouldn't have to buy it. Do you remember, I don't know if you remember this
conversation, when this first came up, both you and I said, be really careful what you ask for
Twitter, because when you sue Musk, that means he gets to look at all of your dirty laundry.
Yeah. He gets to take all
the depositions he wants. He gets to get into your computer and see what's real and what's
not. That is exactly what's playing itself out now. And this whistleblower that comes forward,
Zatko, his name's Zatko and I mean, he was at the top of the food chain, man. This guy was the guy,
he was in charge of security issues. And he says that he was fired because he went to management
and he told them, you have a problem that actually is so serious that it involves national security.
Yeah. You have,
and obviously they were able to get into Obama's account. They were able to get into, to Biden's
account. Lord knows how long this has been going on. This is a big problem for Twitter. I don't
know, I don't know how you run away from this one. Right. And legally speaking, Twitter had signed,
you know, documents, was it with the FTC. Right.
Back in 2011 saying, we will clean up all of our security problems because even 11 years ago,
these problems were happening. And they said, okay, we understand it. We acknowledge it. We
legally promise to do something with it. Okay.
And they didn't. Here's where it goes. It was the
first time you and I talked about it, we said, be careful what you ask for Twitter. When you go
suing Elon Musk, it's gonna get real ugly. Let me tell you the next thing that's gonna happen. You
have 300 million people who potentially have been at risk. Now we know these tech companies have,
have had to pay big billions of dollars for taking that, that material and not
protecting it. Same thing is unfolding here. I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop
against Twitter where somebody says, hey, you know, you, you know, this is class action.
It, it, it is. I mean, we've seen it with, what was it, Equifax. We've seen it with Yahoo. We've
seen it with Facebook. It, it's eventually going to come to Twitter as well. And, and
I think everybody needs to understand too, you and I were not in favor of Musk buying Twitter.
No, no, no. You know, we, we did not want another
oligarch buying up this media outlet, but it is funny to see this unfold. And now Twitter, Elon
Musk looked like the bad guy to begin with and now we found out, oh God, it's actually Twitter.
Yeah. That was trying to pull
a fast one over on Musk and they're gonna pay the price for it. And I tell, they're not gonna get
their 44 billion outta Musk at all. Oh, that ain't gonna happen.
Not gonna happen. Actually, you might see a reverse
lawsuit here. You, you could see something, he could turn this on its head. He could be to say,
say the guy, I'm the one that exposed Twitter 300 million people to the type of thing that's
going on here. Now the, the whistleblower says that they did this. They ignored the
spam. They ignored the bots. They ignored the numbers because it increased profits.
And he could name people where it increased their bonuses. The volume increased the
bonuses of leadership there. This case it's gonna get uglier, it's gonna get
uglier for Twitter than it does Elon Musk. Well, and you also have the potential of
defrauding investors. Right.
Because lying about the number of bots would give you more money from advertisers. So you're
defrauding your advertisers. Advertisers, Stockholder derivative suit,
stockholder's derivative suit. There's a lot of liability here for Twitter.
Yeah. And I think it's gonna get worse. Sometimes you just gotta move on. Twitter
made the mistake saying I'm gonna get this $42 billion. It's gonna go south on 'em.