When we bought our house several years ago, we fell in love with every part of it except one:
the foundation. At 75 years old, we knew these old piers were just about finished
holding this old house up. This year we finally bit the bullet to have them replaced.
Any homeowner who’s had foundation work done can commiserate with us on the cost
and disruption of a project like this. But homes aren’t the only structures with foundations.
It is both a gravitational necessity and a source of job stability to structural and geotechnical
engineers that all construction - great and small - sits upon the ground. And the ways in which we
accomplish such a seemingly unexceptional feat are full of fascinating and unexpected details.
I’m Grady and this is Practical Engineering. In today’s episode, we’re talking about foundations.
This video is sponsored by CuriosityStream and Nebula. More on them later.
There’s really just one rule for structural and geotechnical engineers designing foundations:
when you put something on the ground, it should not move. That seems like a pretty straightforward
directive. You can put a lot of stuff on the ground and have it stay there. For example,
several years ago I optimistically stacked these pavers behind my shed with the false hope
that I would use them in a landscaping project someday, but their most likely future is to sit
here in this shady purgatory for all of eternity. Unfortunately, buildings and other structures are
a little different. Mainly, they are large enough that one part could move relative to the other
parts, a phenomenon we call differential movement. When you move one piece of anyTHING relative to
the rest of it, you introduce stress. And if that stress is greater than the inherent strength of
the thing, that thing will pull itself apart. It happens all the time, all around the world,
including right here in my own house. When one of these piers settles or heaves more
than the others, all the stuff it supports tries to move too. But doorframes, drywall,
and ceramic tile work much better and last much longer when the surrounding structure stays put.
There are many kinds of foundations used for the various structures in our built environment,
but before we dive into how they work, I think it will be helpful to first talk about what they’re
up against, or actually down against. Of course, buildings are heavy, and one of the most important
jobs of a foundation is to evenly distribute that weight into the subsurface as downward
pressure. Soil isn’t infinitely strong against vertical loads. It can fail just like any other
component of a structural system. When the forces are high enough to shear through soil particles,
we call it a bearing failure. The soil directly below the load is forced downward,
pushing the rest of the soil to either side, eventually bulging up around the edges.
Even if the subsurface doesn’t full-on shear, it can still settle. This happens when the particles
are compressed more closely together, and it usually takes place over a longer period of time.
(I have a video all about settlement that you can check out after this.)
So, job number 1 of a foundation is to distribute the downward force of a structure over a large
enough area to reduce the bearing pressure and avoid shear failures or excessive settlement.
Structural loads don’t just come from gravity. Wind can exert tremendous and rapidly-fluctuating
pressure on a large structure pushing it horizontally and even creating uplift like the
wing of an airplane. Earthquakes also create loads on structures, shifting and shaking them with very
little warning. Just like the normal weight of a structure, these loads must also be resisted
by a foundation to prevent it from lifting or sliding along the ground. That’s job number 2.
Speaking of the ground, it’s not the most hospitable place for many building materials.
It has bugs, like termites, that can eat away at wooden members over time, reducing their
strength. It also has moisture that can lead to mold and rot. My house was built in the 1940s
on top of cedar piers. This is a wood species that is naturally resistant to bugs and fungi,
but not completely immune to them as you can see. So, job number 3 of a foundation is to resist
the effects of long-term degradation and decay that come from our tiny biological neighbors.
Another problem with the ground is that soil isn’t really as static as we think.
Freezing isn’t usually a problem for me in central Texas, but many places in the world see
temperatures that rise and fall below the freezing point of water tens or hundreds of times per year.
We all know water expands when it freezes, and it can do so with prodigious force. When this
happens to subsurface water below a structure, it can behave like a jack to lift it up. Over time,
these cycles of freeze and thaw can slowly shift or raise parts of a structure more than others,
creating issues. Similarly, some kinds of soil expand when exposed to moisture.
I also have a video on this phenomenon, so you have two videos to watch after this one. Expansive
clay soil can create the same type of damage as cycles of freeze and thaw by subtly moving
a structure in small amounts with each cycle of wet and dry. So job number 4 of a foundation is
to reach a deep enough layer that can’t freeze or that doesn’t experience major fluctuations
in moisture content to avoid these problems that come with water in the subgrade below a structure.
Job number 5 isn’t necessarily applicable to most buildings, but there are many types of
structures (like bridges and retaining walls) that are regularly subject to flowing water.
Over time (or sometimes over the course of a single flood), that water can create erosion,
undermining the structure. Many foundations are specifically designed to combat erosion,
either with hard armoring or by simply being installed so deep into the earth
that they can’t be undermined by quickly flowing water.
Job number 6 really applies to all of engineering: foundations have to be cost effective. Could the
contractor who built my house in the 1940s have driven twice as many piers, each one to
three times the depth? Of course it can be done, but (with some minor maintenance and repairs),
this one lasted 75 years before needing to be replaced. With the median length of homeownership
somewhere between 5 and 15 years, few people would be willing to pay more for a house with
500 years of remaining life in the foundation than they would for one with 30. I could have
paid this contractor to build me a foundation that will last hundreds of years... but I didn’t.
Engineering is a job of balancing constraints, and many of the decisions in foundation engineering
come down to the question of “How can we achieve all of the first 5 jobs I mentioned
without overdoing it and wasting a bunch of money in the process?” Let’s look at a few ways.
Foundations are generally divided into two classes:
deep and shallow. Most buildings with only a few stories, including nearly all homes,
are built on shallow foundations. That means they transfer the structure’s weight to the surface of
the earth (or just below it). Maybe the most basic of these is how my house was originally built.
They cut down cedar trees, hammered those logs into the ground as piles, layed wooden
beams across the top of those piers, and then built the rest of the house atop the beams.
Pier and beam foundations are pretty common, at least in my neck of the woods, and they have
an added benefit of creating a crawlspace below the structure in which utilities like plumbing,
drains, and electric lines can be installed and maintained. However, all these individual,
unconnected points of contact with the earth leave quite a bit of room for differential movement.
Another basic type of shallow foundation is the strip footing, which generally consists
of a ribbon or strip of concrete upon which walls can sit. In some cases the floor is isolated from
the walls and sits directly on concrete slab atop the subgrade, but strip footings can also support
floor joists, making room for a crawlspace below. For sites with strong soils, this is a great
option because it’s simple and cheap, but if the subgrade soils are poor, strip footings can still
allow differential movement because all the walls aren’t rigidly connected together. In that case,
it makes sense to use a raft foundation - a completely solid concrete slab that extends
across the entire structure. Raft foundations are typically concrete slabs placed directly on
the ground (usually with some thickened areas to provide extra rigidity). They distribute
the loads across a larger area, reducing the pressure on the subgrade, and they can
accommodate some movement of the ground without transferring the movement into a structure,
essentially riding the waves of the earth like a raft on the ocean (hence the name). However,
they don’t have a crawlspace which makes plumbing repairs much more challenging.
One issue with all shallow foundations is that you still need to install them below the frost
line - that is the maximum depth to which water in the soil might freeze during the harshest part
of the winter - in order to avoid frost heaving. In some parts of the contiguous United States,
the frost line can be upwards of 8 feet or nearly two-and-a-half meters.
If you’re going to dig that deep to install a foundation anyway,
you might as well just add an extra floor to your structure below the ground.
That’s usually called a basement, and it can be considered a building’s foundation
(although the walls are usually constructed on a raft or strip footings as described above).
As a structure’s size increases, so do the loads it imposes on the ground, and eventually
it becomes infeasible to rely only on soils near the surface of the earth. Tall buildings,
elevated roadways, bridges, and coastal structures often rely on deep foundations for support. This
is especially true when the soils at the surface are not as firm as the layers farther below the
ground. Deep foundations almost always rely on piles, which are vertical structural elements that
are driven or drilled into the earth, often down to a stronger layer of soil or bedrock, and there
are way more types than I could ever cover in a single video. Piles not only transfer loads at the
bottom (called end bearing), but they can also be supported along their length through a phenomenon
called skin friction. This makes it possible for a foundation to resist much more significant
loads - whether downward, upward or horizontal - within a given footprint of a structure.
One of the benefits of driven piles is that you install them in somewhat the
same way that they’ll be loaded in their final configuration. There’s some efficiency there
because you can just stop pushing the pile into the ground once it’s able to resist
the design loads. There’s a problem with this though. Let me show you what I mean.
This hydraulic press has more than enough power to push this steel rod into the ground.
And at first, it does just that. But eventually, it reaches a point where the weight of the press
is less than the bearing capacity of the pile, and it just lifts itself up. Easy… (you might think).
Just add more weight. But consider that these piles might be designed to support the weight
of an entire structure. It’s not feasible to bring in or build some massive weight
just to react against to drive a pile into the ground. Instead, we usually use hammers,
which can deliver significantly more force to drive a pile with only a relatively small weight.
The problem with hammered piles is that the dynamic loading they undergo during installation
is different from the static loading they see once in service. In other words,
buildings don’t usually hammer on their foundations. For example, if a pile can
withstand the force of a 5-ton weight dropped from 16 feet or 5 meters without moving, what’s
the equivalent static load it can withstand? That turns out to be a pretty complicated question,
and even though there are published equivalencies between static and dynamic loads, their accuracy
can vary widely depending on soil conditions. That’s especially true for long piles where
the pressure wave generated by a hammer might not even travel fast enough to load the entire member
at the same moment in time. Static tests are more reliable, but also much more expensive because you
either have to bring in a ton (or thousands of tons) of weight to put on top, or you have to
build additional piles with a beam across them to give the test rig something to react against.
One interesting solution to this problem is called statnamic testing of piles.
In this method, a mass is accelerated upward using explosives, creating an
equal and opposite force on the pile to be tested. It’s kind of like a reverse hammer,
except unlike a hammer where the force on the pile lasts only for a few milliseconds,
the duration of loading in a statnamic test is often upwards of 100 or 200 milliseconds.
That makes it much more similar to a static force on the pile without having to bring in
tons and tons of weight or build expensive reaction piers just to conduct a test.
I’m only scratching the surface (or subsurface) of a topic that fills hundreds of engineering
textbooks and the careers of thousands of contractors and engineers. If all the earth
was solid rock, life would be a lot simpler, but maybe a lot less interesting too. If there are
topics in foundations that you’d like to learn more about, add a comment or send me an email,
and I’ll try to address it in a future video, but I hope this one gives you some appreciation
of those innocuous bits of structural and geotechnical engineering below our feet.
Hey, thanks for sticking around to the end of this video. You know how this works because you
probably watch a lot of videos about science and engineering to the end just like I do.
You probably also don’t enjoy watching ads like this one, which is great, because Nebula doesn’t
have any. Nebula is a streaming service built by and for independent creators like MinutePhysics,
Real Engineering, Wendover Productions, and a bunch of others (including me).
It’s a way for us to try new ideas that might not work on advertiser-supported platforms like
YouTube. My videos go live there the day before they publish here, with no ads or sponsorships.
And, we’re super excited to continue our partnership with CuriosityStream, a service with
thousands of documentaries and non-fiction titles on pretty much every subject you can imagine.
CuriosityStream loves independent creators and wants to help us grow our platform, so they’re
offering free access to Nebula when you sign up at CuriosityStream.com/practicalengineering.
I know there are a lot of streaming services right now, and all those monthly subscriptions
can be tough to keep track of. That’s why this bundle is such an awesome deal. CuriosityStream
is taking 26% off an annual plan - that makes it only $15 for an entire year of access to
thousands of thought-provoking documentaries on CuriosityStream AND everything on Nebula as
well. You can watch awesome big-budget content on CuriosityStream. I love watching the European
Inventor Awards that showcase the coolest new inventions each year on CuriosityStream. Or,
watch the new Nebula-exclusive series “Logistics of D-Day” by my friend Brian at Real Engineering.
It’s a great way to support my channel and a whole host of your other favorite educational creators.
Plus it’s just a great deal. Do us both a favor and click that link in the description.
Thank you for watching, and let me know what you think!