>> Dianne Feinstein was part of the committee that was questioning Jack Dorsey on November 17th.
And that hearing had a moment that was pretty disastrous for Feinstein.
And I'm actually surprised it didn't get as much attention as it's getting right now.
But Jane Mayer from the New Yorker highlighted it.
In order to write a story about something that the democratic party has been keeping from voters,
and it's very relevant. So it centers around this video that I'm about to show you,
pay close attention to it. And then I'll explain what
this is all about. >> I'm not sure.
Actually what the answer to this should be. But on November seventh, President Trump
tweeted and I quote, I won this election by a lot and quote. Obviously that's not true.
President Trump lost the election. The warning label that Twitter is applied to the tweet
says and I quote, official sources may not have called the race when this was tweeted and quote.
Do you believe that label goes far enough to prevent the tweets harms
when the tweet is still visible and not accurate? >> I do because it's not just
the surface level label. >> Well, let me give you a specific.
On November seven, President Trump tweeted this. I won this election by a lot, and quote.
That's obviously not true. President Trump lost the election. The warning label that Twitter
has applied to the tweet says and I quote, official sources may not have called the race
when this was tweeted, and quote. Now here's the question, does that label do
enough to prevent the tweets harms when the tweet is still visible and is not accurate?
>> I believe it's really important that we show people a broader context.
>> So she repeated the exact same question after Jack Dorsey had already answered the question
word for word almost. And so this kind of raises some questions about our her mental
and cognitive health. And it turns out that some of the people who are close to Feinstein
in Congress have spoken to the New Yorker and shed some light on what's really going on.
So according to Jane Mayer's reporting, speaking on background and with respect for
her accomplished career. They say her short term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets
she has been briefed on a topic, accusing her staff of failing to do so just as they have.
Feinstein staff said that she sometimes seems herself and other times appeared unreachable.
In fact, one former senate aide said this to the New Yorker, the staff is in such a bad position
they have to defend her and make her seem normal. One aid though, to another senator
described what he called a Kabuki meeting in which Feinstein staff tried to steer her
through a proposed piece of legislation that she protested was just words, which makes no sense.
And then things had finally gotten so bad that Senator Chuck Schumer had to pull her
aside and have a talk with her. And that was when she decided to step down from the
Senate Judiciary Committee. And of course, that also followed
the way she bungled the hearings for now Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
>> So, look, I take no joy in this at all. It's really a sad situation. Before
when we were fighting Feinstein and we thought she did not have mental deterioration, I was the one
to say what no one else in the media was, which is that, she does not have a good record.
She has a terrible record. She has a very conservative record.
Now Jane Mayer is the first one with courage to actually report on this.
The rest of the media knows this. They've known it apparently for years,
but as usual they're not reporters, they're just working for corporate democrats.
So they never told you. Okay, great, I really appreciate it. By the way,
the entire California media supported Diane Feinstein in her re-election. She's a brilliant,
experienced legislator, a wonderful progressive that this California needs. We all know she
has dementia. It's no big deal. Don't tell the voters, don't tell the voters.
Either way, she wasn't even up against a Republican.
It was largely Democrats in the primary and then, the general election it was
two Democrats. They could have voted for Kevin DeLeon. And how to perfectly mentally
their person. I don't know what else to say. Just a normal person that doesn't have dementia.
So the staff tells her stuff, she forgets it instantly.
The Schumer story that Ana told you about,
he tells her one day, hey, we got to take you off the committee, et cetera. That was hard. It was,
and she's in a lot of pain and that I feel bad for her because she's a person who's suffering.
And I've seen family members and loved ones go through this. It's really gut wrenching.
And then the next day she forgets. So Schumer has had the same exact conversation with her,
the next day and the next day. For God's sake, get her out of there.
If you care about her, get her out of there.
Nope, nope, nope. Corporate democrats must be protected no matter
what. So other than Jane Mayer, I don't see anybody else reporting this.
So does everybody in the media know that Diane Feinstein clearly has dementia? And they're
just not saying it because they basically work for her. It's insanity, total insanity.
There are almost no reporters left in this country. Okay, now you want to hear one of
the most ridiculous things you've ever heard. It's both true and ridiculous.
Well, one former top aide said, yeah,
but quote, she's still smarter and quicker than at least a third of the other members.
That's probably true. And I think way worse of an insult
for the rest of the Democrats than you realize. So yes, a lot of them are very advanced in age,
can barely function. Why? Because of corruption. Because the money they have,
the more they win. The more corporations give them money, the more the media celebrates them.
They're leading in the race to have most money. That means they are the most credible
and legitimate candidates. So, what does that do? It perpetuates a cycle where democrats
never, ever lose because they have a monopoly on the source of power, money. We've legalized bribes
and the media never tells you, that's why we have people who've literally, should get help here.
I'm not saying in a bad way, I'm being 100% genuine. If you're a family member of Diane
Feinstein, get her out of there. What are you doing? What are you doing? And the rest
of the democrats are like, we know, she can't do the job at all. Let's all lie on her behalf.
If you love her, I get it, right? You've known her personally all these years,
and you don't want to embarrass her nationally. But that's why you
should have done something years ago. >> Yeah, I mean her family members
have benefited from the sweetheart deals that she's managed to pass in the Senate.
So maybe her family members like the profits that they're making off of her so called leadership in
Congress, I don't know. But clearly people around her aren't doing the right thing.
And immediately after Chuck Schumer had that conversation with her, she forgot about it. So-
>> Yeah, by the way, look, if she's not gonna see this, but if she did, she'd forget about it.
Have you ever had a family member who has Alzheimer's? I get frustrated with folks
when they can't understand how Alzheimer's work. I don't know that Diane Feinstein has
that particular ailment, but clearly she has an ailment where she can't remember anything.
So, that you will tell, they can't recognize their sons and daughters, they can't recognize anyone.
It's something that happens to your brain. It's not negotiable. We are supposed to be the party
that believes in science and medicine and facts. So, but the entire national media and the entire
democratic party has agreed upon a fiction, which is that Diane Feinstein is totally fine. So, nope.
Who cares, it's just like Anna said, I don't know about her family members.
But as long as she's giving the corporate donors everything they want,
which is definitely what's happening. And by the way, they probably think,
who cares? I mean, yes, she's doing her job, donors get everything they want.
Democratic party is is thrilled, national media is thrilled. Status quo, yay,
right? But if they replaced her, who would new some appoint?
Another corporate democratic robot. So what difference would it make?