the university of texas at austin did this was a really interesting say to
figure out whether or not men are into dom looking women now in their argument
is that evolution speaks for itself right
and biology speaks for itself men are looking to spread their cd and its
hearings you have um... you know
sex with a woman who
elat isn't necessarily smart enough to think about the consequences of having
sex with him and is not a committee
branka act let newspaper new ones you should have sex with are the ones that
are dumb enough to have sex with u yours
that that's known as someone who did not
so have their theory is known as a sexual explain ability hypothesis
okay so ob what they did is they have one group of respondents
decide on eighty cues that indicate that a woman
is not intelligent
o'shaughnessy by itself some of those key innocent juditha included like women
rubbing their and realize that white it was a law that has nothing to do drugs
but if we want them earlier i don't like a picture of her life perfect but they
didn't even see that normie let's go for it
the severe arabic that's which is interested folklore honest
obviously hot spots i will talk about that in a second but investors of these
on wood dome women do by the american
co
how does that have hired add up because that literally the most extreme example
that they gave him right
but another another examples like a woman holding a liquor at a club like
that kind of stuff but if you have those articles are images that were indicate
to them and that the woman is not the most intelligent that she has never did
why does this study is ridiculous preferably is intelligent woman get
drunk eight clubs to exactly yes but it is assigned to do you wanna have sex
not because they're dumb because they don't like it
first of all right
kolkata
it was a pretty good size but i think that they knew of intelligence are
getting first of all yes it is flawed but let me just signed the results i
think that it's really interesting
not a completely different group of men
uh... from our benefit pictures that demonstrated those eighty eighteen
strain
and then they had up pictures that
demonstrate eighty kids and then uh... women like i don't know
that don't do any of those things right and it may be a woman in a library
selective and then they have the men in a different group of respondents
decide on which group of women are the most attractive
uh... and
the majority of the men went for the women who had
they've done to use
okay they went for the grim probe pinch your nipples over one of the library the
all this you this crowded and having congregate girl with a month and they're
more likely to have sex with
they found more attractive that's more rationalization the alice
but that's a also called beer goggles it up with an overnight illegal torches
intimate
yes she stopped
time and she's totally on targets are going to study pictures of the day when
it or immature seeming women for example or whether you look sleepy or
intoxicated did something happen
department of backed
not surprisingly matter rated them is being easy to bed
but more importantly they were also perceived as being more physically
attractive than female peers who seemed more interested or quick with big
business
oh fainter ideal woman four man is one that is a unconscious
well i don't think she is so press that warning she seemed really didn't win it
because he's not
context
undergoing
ancestor disaster okay so out
and a problem with the initial
theory behind this whole study break
because their theory is that men want to spread their seat
that's a look for the dumbest woman
attacks are changing men are necessarily looking despite their seat there lindsey
just have sex
bigger forty they want to have sex so they're looking for the issues led a
now i i don't think it necessarily has to do with spending the sea
and receives as a proxy rightly so
you know i recently now consciously think like i would like to have sex that
is my biological imperative but i don't actually want to spread my seats i use a
condom or whatever it might be right in all these exceeded one us further say
they didn't think that through its arab but
you know they're the distinction is not that important to me because
this is same biological imperative you know i think i actually uh...
want to heart of review that
basic premise is completely for because that that they got on the premise that
women want to somehow card their sexuality don't wanna have sex
and matter the sexual predators the happy da whole uh... a paradigm
is uh... something that's the inheritance taxes and iran yes and lot
of studies
so that's complete not the case
that confrim for the vast majority of our human history
you know we live in small bands of hundred gather societies
we can settle down and over the society's they shared everything
including sex with one another so
weaver we were more like the but no those who who have sex with everyone in
their own community there wasn't this a monogamy none of that this this all of
this thinking kind of came into being
after we settle down with agriculture
and later on to victoria times behind his own were studies we've talk about a
long long time a lot of and let me just and ensemble all that i mean the core
assumption here of the study is
if the woman is willing to give away sex
more freely right
without locking you down into a manager whatever it might be the she's dart
exactly right
and calmer
horrible assumption
and in this day and age
totally unwarranted
but he said in victorian england it would be a lot of societal consequences
if you didn't want the guy down any site with you and he wouldn't take it you
know all right
you give me an argument even though would be a biological or immigrate now
you don't even have that
so it's the most integrated weird
unscientific study i've ever seen