Throughout history we’ve aimed to build bigger and better things.
For thousands of years, the Great Pyramids were our greatest architectural triumph…
but even their size is now surpassed by modern skyscrapers.
We still, though, have a long way to go until we find out exactly how big a structure can
be.
This is Unveiled, and today we’re exploring four theoretical megastructures, ranked from
big to massive.
Are you a fiend for facts?
Are you constantly curious?
Then why not subscribe to Unveiled for more clips like this one?
And ring the bell for more fascinating content!
A megastructure is a single construct of almost unimaginable scale.
Current contenders for the megastructure mantle on Earth include the Great Wall of China,
as well as some of the world’s tallest skyscrapers, like the Empire State Building, Shanghai Tower,
or the record-breaking tallest building itself, Dubai’s Burj Khalifa.
But when we move the focus away from our own planet and into space, there are seemingly
no limits to how big we could theoretically build with enough time, resources, and knowledge.
Currently, only one megastructure candidate exists beyond Earth: The International Space
Station.
But though the ISS is absolutely one of the most impressive things we’ve ever built,
it’s still not particularly big – it’s only 357 feet long.
And that’s seriously small fry compared to what we hope to build in the future.
Broadly speaking, theorised space-age megastructures come in four categories of size, with the
smallest being trans-orbital structures.
Most trans-orbital structures are imagined as a way to propel vehicles and people into
space… and by far the most popular so far planned is the space elevator - an enormous
tube that could, in theory, continuously ferry objects into orbit.
The main benefit of a space elevator is that with it we wouldn’t need to use rockets
anymore to leave Earth.
People and things would now be carried into orbit via a relatively simple mechanism.
We’d easily hop into the elevator, choose our desired altitude, and arrive in space
at the end.
No need for the costly, potentially dangerous and environmentally damaging rocket launches
of the past!
As exciting as this idea is, however, it’s not all that practical.
The Kármán line is generally considered to be where Earth’s atmosphere ends and
space begins… it’s 62 miles up.
So, to get into orbit we would need a 62-mile-long elevator.
Today, the world’s longest elevator is at a gold mine in South Africa.
It measures at just over 1.4 miles long… and that’s 1.4 miles down, into the ground.
Not up into the sky.
As of the early 2020s, then, we simply don’t have a material remotely strong or flexible
enough to actually build a space elevator.
We would need something that can safely function and reliably withstand the speed of the Earth
moving through space.
Carbon nanotubes could be our best bet at the moment.
But, while they do exist, they’re also extremely expensive to produce and at present impossible
to make on the scale needed.
We’re also in totally uncharted territory here, so really there’s no reason to think
that even carbon nanotubes definitely would be strong enough.
We could well need something else, something better, and something that hasn’t even been
invented yet.
If we could build a space elevator, though, it would be used not just by space agencies
for cheaper and easier space exploration… but for tourism, too.
And all of those tourists are going to need a final destination.
The next size of megastructure is known as orbital, and arguably the ISS already counts
as being within this category.
But we’re expecting to see much more than just the Space Station in the future, with
various plans for far bigger, more ambitious and more opulent orbital habitats.
For decades, scientists and designers have pitched increasingly viable plans for orbital
space colonies.
But the most famous comes from the Princeton physicist Gerard K. O’Neill, in the 1970s.
Called O’Neill Cylinders, these designs, like many similar ones, rely on a vast centrifuge
to create artificial gravity.
This centrifuge is really the key bit of technology needed to make it work.
O’Neill Cylinders would be large, round, and they’d rotate, with this rotation working
to provide the gravity.
One of the best things, though, about centrifugal gravity is that it potentially works just
as well (if not better) with larger objects than smaller… so it would actually be within
our best interests to build vast, city-sized structures of this type, capable of housing
thousands of people.
Within the Cylinder, hydroponics farms would provide food… while shuttle runs from Earth
could top up other additional supplies.
Orbital cities like this might prove a little challenging to live on full-time, especially
for the earliest generations.
But they’d also be an astounding – and lucrative – short-term, tourist destination.
O’Neill’s ideas haven’t been lost in the twenty-first century, either.
Today, Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin have set out plans to build a new age of space habitats
based on O’Neill’s designs.
If you had the chance, would you want to live somewhere like this?
With space elevators and orbital stations in place, however, we can swiftly begin to
look even further afield for the next type of megastructure: a planetary structure.
This is, as you’d expect, something the size of a planet.
The most famous planetary megastructure in science-fiction is, of course, the Death Star
in “Star Wars”, a world-destroying superweapon.
But, while it’s depressingly easy to imagine humans building an enormous weapon like this,
there are non-destructive planet-sized options we could build, as well - like shellworlds.
Shellworlds are an ambitious, theoretical terraforming method… where an entire, otherwise
inhospitable planet is enclosed in a spherical shell, which would create an artificial atmosphere,
if pumped full of the right gases.
This would be a massive undertaking, but when some of our other ideas for potentially terraforming
another planet involve nuking it to oblivion… shellworlds perhaps start to look like a more
attractive prospect.
Again, the materials needed aren’t exactly certain at the moment… but most designs
involve the shell being transparent, so that the sky is still visible for anyone living
within them.
In theory, these structures could make any planet hospitable to humans.
And were we to build multiple of them, then we’d essentially have a net of human-friendly
bubbles dotted about space.
In some cases, it’s thought we wouldn’t even need a planet to begin with… that we
could build these megastructures from scratch, wherein one shell encases another one - and
we live in the space in between them.
Shellworlds are a far-future dream, but what a dream it is!
Lastly, though, we have one final step to make.
And while a planet definitely is large, planet-sized structures still aren’t the biggest we could
build.
Stellar megastructures theoretically exist on the stellar scale.
These are the size of stars.
And stars can be truly gigantic.
Already, the sun is the largest object in our solar system, but one of the biggest stars
ever discovered, UY Scuti, has a radius more than 1,700 times greater than the sun – and
it’s 30 times more massive, too.
Stellar engines are imagined megastructures that would harvest the power created by a
star and convert it into energy we could actually use.
The most famous is the Dyson sphere; a large structure built around a star, that siphons
off its energy, providing an unprecedented power source.
Nuclear fusion is the reaction that happens within stars to keep them burning.
We have artificially created fusion reactions on Earth before now, but they are so extraordinarily
expensive and difficult to achieve that they aren’t yet a viable power solution for humankind.
Build a Dyson Sphere, though, and we needn’t worry.
We’d no longer have to artificially generate fusion… we could just tap into where it
happens naturally.
But arguably an even more outlandish idea than that is a Shkadov thruster, which would
use the energy of an entire star specifically for propulsion.
Shkadov thrusters, like everything else in this video, are totally theoretically right
now.
But there are some ideas as to how they could work.
Once again, we’d be bleeding energy from a star.
But then, there’d be a huge, hemispherical mirror, or light-sail, to reflect that energy
in whatever direction we desired… to create thrust and give us control.
The scale of engineering we’d be dealing with here is astronomically huge.
Literally.
But the benefits of the Shkadov thruster are similarly gargantuan.
With one, we’d be able to travel at the incredible speeds that stars already travel
at.
The fastest star we’ve ever discovered, S4714, is currently flying through space at
about eight percent the speed of light – that’s 15,000 miles per second.
So… imagine hacking into that level of power.
To some, it’s beyond belief.
And it’s certainly far beyond our capabilities at the moment.
Realistically, we need to first break out of the solar system before it can even be
considered a possibility… but isn’t that the beauty of theoretical designs like these?
With enough time, resources and knowledge to design and build stuff, there’s arguably
no limit to what we could create.
But those are four especially exciting, theoretical megastructures, ranked from big to massive.
What do you think?
Is there anything we missed?
Let us know in the comments, check out these other clips from Unveiled, and make sure you
subscribe and ring the bell for our latest content.