can earn more than an oil company based in america is planning a triple
its a pipeline capacity in Canada they want to do
a 5.4 billion dollar project and in order to get that approved in Canada
they have to send a proposal to the federal government there
well their proposal talks about oil spills and they say hey you know what of
course there are downsides to oil spills
but there's actually potential upside to an oil spill
so corny to the proposal pipeline spills can have both positive
and negative affect on local and regional economies both in the short and
long term
spill response and cleanup creates business and employment opportunities
for affected communities
regions and clean up service providers to know what we see here
is actually the republicans are all right that the these
that these the Keystone XL pipeline
will be a job creator because then all the jobs that will be created
when the oil spills yes it's amazing what mike got my
my own bones were not work either are cleaner cell
yet waiting for an oil we cannot believe that matters I hate how to get a good
thing and I'll send that since the Bell Bay
you know it's Billy oh I'm gonna get a job yeah us liberals are always focusing
on the negative is right there in that huge positive affective oil spill that
we've just been ignoring at the entire and let people clean them up
they have to stay in hotels that's great for the hike but I think about that I
don't think about that but good thing kill the room
I would be surprised if they would include that in their proposal its in
Thane that they would
and look as you know news analyst says people who
talk about the news and happy side to discussions were expected to have the
type to discussions right
but when it comes to politicians the United States I feel like they wouldn't
be as critical
about this proposal as the politicians in Canada something to give you an
example right now
one politician Kennedy Stewart an MP a poor region that would be impacted by
this pipeline
so the following we know candor Morgan is using every trick in the book to push
this pipeline through our community
but this takes the cake proposing that if bill would actually be good for the
local economy
the assertion shows the utter disregard this company to house for British
Columbians right
so here to get rid of people live in Columbia he even could seem like a small
number and we're going on this topic
so I love the fact that he was critical about this it's great but at the same
time we have politicians here in the United States
they want to get the president pressure the president to
approved up but construction up the Keystone XL pipeline
no question that don't do any studies on the environment don't do any studies on
oil spills or the impact it will have on local communities
do it do it do it case in point a merrill Andrew
who is a senator out here in the United States she is also on the head
love which committee the head love the Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee
here's what he had to say during a recent interview can't figure out why
the president doesn't go ahead and just let this thing get through
what's gonna happen is the Keystone pipeline I need to build gonna pass
or Joe I hope so I've been working for over a year with senator hole then
I think the Keystone pipeline should have been built a year though it's been
too slow the process has been too slow
we've already built 2.9 million miles a pipe
in this country and news for everybody
we have to build more I want America to be energy
independent and weekend the first time that anyone has mentioned
North Dakota Senator John open on TV's I was praying together
I Mary Landrieu is on understandably
taking this position and has been consistently
yet when you look at the politics of it she is up for reelection
this year a her races have been decided by as little
as a thousand I think maybe two thousand votes really small percentages
and she lives in a petroleum I
you know a dependent state and
and Louisiana so but by the same token
she is a smart woman who should be able to understand why the president
is you know sitting on the bench with this thing and why it's not just
the slam dunk that that Joe Scarborough
portend pretends that she that it this is all smoke and mirrors right because
this pipeline is not gonna make United States energy independent
this is a pipeline right to take oil from Canada
and move it are the god damned continent that is it
to keep all the hotel get a look at this moment here is what they do in an
election year because that's when you need to smoke and that's when you need
the mayor's
you need the people in your state to believe that
all my senator who is running for reelection wanted to be energy
independent and this is our energy independence so bomb
done yeah when in fact that has nothing to do with the reality right so it's
like an insidious live right so she knows that was going to happen is oil
spills that will who knows what the
what's going to happen what's going to be the deleterious effects to the
environment
in the united states she knows that this isn't gonna make as energy independent
the cheese is kinda like that just goes to show you again ralph nader was right
that very minor is a democrat and whoever he's running against her but
they're the same
their bought and sold by the same in maryland you maybe she's for gay writer
which is
around the margins she's not a sure thing I mean she is that she's
I mean to personal she's not horrible across the board that I think you'll see
I'm are done and on this issue
she's a senator from louisiana I and and there are petroleum
you know interests in that state it would behoove her to support that yet
but
so he got a lotta love it she was alive she does not have to live he or she is
going after the least common denominator
read her statement these are you so it actually gets worse because it goes from
misinformation to straight-out fear-mongering she starts discussing
russia
and how important it is for us to focus on what's happening in russia
and how energy independence in the United States is extremely critical
here's our reasoning take a look
do you believe that it's politics that stopping the present them supporting
Keystone
well honestly I think he has some serious
questions about how much it would contribute to
I you know to the deteriorating climate situation but as you look at the facts
and you all know them as well as I do
it surrounding air I mean it's basically less than you know
Arthur dove 1 percent above additional carbon to the atmosphere and Joe what I
think you and make you would appreciate is that the industry which gets beaten
up in washington
sometimes by both sides has been doing a really good job on efficiency and
reducing
our carbon output and I think what Americans when americans look at what's
happening in russia right now
right and the Ukraine I think it sends shivers up their spine
and it should both incredible about that interview
is that no one questioned been the misinformation that she was giving in
and I love how she makes a reference to
the fax I know the fact the you know the facts we both know the fat no
miller won a bit while one of you might know or others want to act with but
everything else is gonna be a lot
right other you want that and I will couch it with a bunch of lies
or misinformation which you know is tantamount to lie so
I I think absolutely and we will you know that deal Andrew
has another agenda here she is terrified at the democrats part
terrified that she loses her see because she is a
big you know card in the democratic majority
in the senate which today they said it as an 82 percent chance
love lose in the party is needed percent chance of losing their
majority I I don't know who decide for that but but
this is a big this is a big see they're willing to let her go it alone
on this so that they can keep their majorities and especially in the
judiciary committee because they're terrified as hell
the Ruth Bader Ginsburg need to leave the bench