[DIGITAL TONE]
This week, I want to talk to you about something that's
been weighing on my mind lately, and that's
the issue of critique.
If you spend any time on the internet,
it's something you come across frequently.
If you're the victim of internet trolls
or if you are an internet troll, listen up.
There is an etiquette to critique
that has been in play for a long time in art schools
all over the world.
Let's see if we can learn something from that world
and apply it in ours.
So here's how an art critique usually goes.
An art student sets up their work
to show their teacher, a group of teachers,
their friends, their class, or an even bigger group.
Then, discussion ensues.
Questions are asked.
And criticism is offered.
Sometimes, things do go awry.
Tears are shed and expletives hurled.
But it's usually a civilized affair.
And there is an etiquette to these things
that I think it would be useful for us to discuss,
in relation to the art assignment
and to the internet community at large.
But first, let's talk about why we should
critique in the first place.
Because it's the internet and you can anonymously
say whatever you want?
I'd say no.
Because you'd like to change the minds of the person
you're critiquing?
Definitely no.
Critique it's often most instructive for the person
offering it.
In looking at other people's work
and formulating your opinion of it,
you're learning a great deal.
I don't often see people responding to internet comments
by saying, gee, thanks.
I never thought about it that way.
I agree with you now.
But that's OK, Because it's still a constructive process.
It can help shape your beliefs and teach you
about different ways of looking and thinking.
That being said, here are some critiquing guidelines.
One, be attentive.
The internet has trained us to look
at something for a millisecond and to scan text quickly.
Fight that urge.
Let something linger on the screen
for seconds or even minutes.
Look at it once and, then, look at another time later
in the day or the next day or the next week.
I often have instinctual reactions
when I first see something.
But then, my opinion changes the longer I spend with it,
or even a week later when I'm remembering it.
Use your faculties and your patience
and trust your reactions.
Two, don't be lazy.
I am a terrible example to follow.
When I look at all of the responses that
come into "The Art Assignment," my head fills with ideas.
But then, I get a phone call or I'm in a hurry,
and I just reblog something or say something tepid
instead of saying something substantive about it.
I also lean way too heavily on the word interesting.
It's value-neutral, which is helpful.
But it also says very little.
For example, the history of documentary photography
is interesting.
But "The Simpsons" is also interesting.
It's not a particularly specific adjective.
There are lots of lazy words.
And it's OK to use them sometimes.
But try to follow them up with something that has teeth.
Instead of saying, this is great!
--say, this is great, because you've done A, B, and C
and then surprised us all by adding D.
Three, be generous.
Try to look at each work of art for what is successful.
Performance artist Mathew Goulish
tells us in an essay on criticism
to look for the aspects of wonder.
We want to encourage more wonder in the world, right?
So when we come across it, let's celebrate it.
Criticism can be an incredible act of empathy.
What made someone make that thing?
Why did they do it that way?
Be sympathetic to the maker and realize
that the mere act of putting yourself and your work
out there takes courage.
Four, find your point of entry.
You don't have to have a PhD in art history to talk about art.
So find your point of connection to a piece,
as personal as you'd like it to be.
For example, this reminds me of a bath mat,
in the best possible way.
Because its tactility is enticing,
and it transports me instantly to my friend's bathroom,
circa 1997, which had floral wallpaper and smelled
like Garnier Fructis Shampoo.
As it happens, it is a bath mat and not an artwork.
But it could be an artwork.
Think about what the thing in question
reminds you of, whether it's from the same discipline,
something personal, or something far flung.
Think about the decisions that were made along the way-- maybe
it's the materials used or not used,
maybe it's the way it's been arranged in space
or documented for us to see, maybe it's
what the maker decided to include or exclude
from the frame of the work.
What are the skills on display?
Maybe the artist is not an amazing draftsperson
but still ended up with a delightfully peculiar,
delicately-rendered drawing that communicates
much more than a perfectly photo-realistic drawing might
have done.
Maybe the ideas behind a project outweigh the execution.
Maybe the execution outweighs the ideas.
And if you can't think of anything declarative to say,
ask a question.
Don't be a jerk.
There is a lot you can say about something without declaring
it to be good or bad.
It can be a productive challenge to try
to not make any value judgments while talking about a work.
Most art critiques take place in a room
where all of the individuals have
to look at each other's faces and deal
with the immediate consequences of saying something
provocative.
Pretend you're in the same room with the person
you're critiquing.
Pretend they're someone you know.
I'm not saying to lie or blow smoke.
I'm saying, don't be a jerk.
And finally, why make yourself available for critique?
Faced with the reality of all the internet trolls
in the world, it's completely understandable
to stay in your hole and not participate
in internet communities.
I totally get that.
But the positives of participating
in this and other online projects
can be real and rewarding.
It's hard to have perspective on your work.
And offering it up for review means
you might have the chance to see it with fresh eyes
and learn from the experience of others.
But it also makes you vulnerable,
which can be a miserably crappy feeling but, sometimes,
a liberating and empowering one.
If you can try to take your ego out of it,
you can learn a great deal.
I want you guys to talk about each other's work.
I don't want this to be just me passing judgment on you guys
and the amazing work you do.
We must be in this together.
So talk to each other.
Comment on works.
Don't be mean.
But think about what the aspects of wonder might be in each work
and share that with each other.
It will make the experience of "The Art Assignment"
better for everyone involved.
OK, so here is a self-portrait I made
in college in a painting class I took with the artist
Ed Paschke.
It was an experiment in under-painting,
which is a technique where you paint something
in all the same hue, like a darker hue,
and then you paint color over it.
Let's critique.
Or if they're commenting on videos or Tumblr posts,
it makes this community interesting and worthwhile.
Ah!
I said interesting.