As the Trump administration continues to crack down on
undocumented immigrants, the majority of them will be sent
to detention facilities run by private companies.
Private prisons.
They are cashing in on President Trump's get-tough policies
at the border.
How did immigration detention become more than a billion-dollar industry?
And does it matter that detention is now heavily privatized?
Josue Vladimir Cortez Diaz grew up gay in El Salvador, where he says
he was persecuted for years, targeted by gangs and extorted.
After receiving death threats, he fled to the United States hoping
for asylum, was caught crossing the border and sent to a detention
facility in Adelanto, California.
But when Cortez Diaz and others launched a hunger strike,
they say the guards roughed them up, pepper sprayed them
and threw some of them into hot showers.
The company that runs Adelanto, GEO Group, says these claims are
completely baseless.
But Cortez Diaz's lawyer, Rachel Steinback, says she believes the
problems at Adelanto were exacerbated because of the fact
that the facility is privately run.
The main goal of a private prison company is to maximize profit,
and to maximize profit, you minimize your expenditures.
All of the incentive is to get more people in, hold them there for
longer and provide them with the barest necessities possible.
But GEO Group says they are proud of their long-standing record of
providing high-quality detention services that meet standards set by
the government.
The use of private companies took hold in the 1980s, as the country
faced a crisis:
overcrowded and unsafe public prisons.
American business is becoming bullish on prisons.
And a new company, the Corrections Corporation of America, or CCA,
now called CoreCivic, offered an alternative.
At CCA, we have an answer to your problems.
We intend to be the IBM, if you will, of the corrections business.
But the idea of prisons for profit was met with skepticism.
A highly controversial idea: turning the jail keys over to
private business and trying to make crime pay to investors.
James Stewart, a Justice Department official, was studying the issue.
They had no history, and you're saying, what's your experience?
They go, well, we'll get a warden.
We'll hire a couple of people to train them.
We can do it.
And you're like, I'm not sure this is going to work, right?
What about the prisoners?
Who is accountable for their welfare?
Critics of private prisons say making a profit off imprisonment
is not compatible with the administration of justice.
But the test of the controversial idea came not with prisoners,
but with immigrants.
President Carter today declared parts of Florida to be under a
state of emergency because of the enormous influx of Cuban refugees.
Illegal aliens, more than a million of them in the past year,
have come across the Mexican border.
Immigration authorities were overwhelmed.
Part of the problem, says the Immigration Service, is that there
are not enough places to hold all the illegal immigrants.
They were scratching their heads saying, what are we going to do?
The Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS, the predecessor to
ICE, turned to the private sector.
INS was the first government agency to really come out strongly
for privatization. I mean, they were under the gun to do it.
Richard Crane believed privatization would not lower standards and could
lead to better conditions.
A lot of people had the misimpression that, in order for
them to make a profit, they had to cut corners.
When I was with CCA, they didn't cut corners.
This construction site in Houston, Texas, will soon become the first
completely free enterprise prison in the United States.
It is being built to detain up to 300 aliens charged with entering
this country illegally and awaiting deportation hearings.
It was like a proof of concept.
What it did is it provided evidence that this could work and it could
be, you could get more for the same amount of money, and right now
we needed more.
We built the facility in six months...
Building on that success, the industry began to expand.
The private prisons are clean, spacious and well-managed.
In here, it's enchanted, I mean very enchanted.
Soon, private companies were running local, state and later
federal jails and prisons.
They will find ways to economize.
And so we said, look, if you're going, going to have the private
sector, you're going to have to be sure you have inspections.
That's part of the price.
You have to build that into the contract.
The denial of freedom is now clearly big business.
But over the years, problems began to make headlines.
Arizona inmates rioted twice at this private prison in less
than a month.
New questions are being raised tonight about the wisdom of turning
public prisons over to private operators.
Charges have been filed against them now in three other states and
the Justice Department says it is watching closely.
Civil rights groups like the ACLU argued that private companies
shouldn't be performing a government function.
Handing control of prisoners over to a for-profit company is a recipe
for abuse and neglect.
There are serious human costs that have been documented
over and over again.
But companies like CoreCivic say that they maintain high standards
of care for detainees and that, in fact, their sole job is to help
the government solve problems, including the fluctuating need
for detention space.
The government has expanded its detention of undocumented immigrants over the
years - increasingly so starting under the Clinton administration.
And private companies have stepped up.
Immigrant detention has turned into a gold rush for the private
corrections industry.
Alonzo Peña had spent his career in customs and immigration enforcement.
But when he became deputy director of ICE in 2008, he says he saw
widespread problems with detention.
Issues were apparent in government-run facilities,
but Peña says that many of complaints coming in
were about privately-run ones.
These private companies, it wasn't their priority to ensure
that the highest standards were being met.
When I found out that guards mistreated people, you know,
violated women, abused women, didn't provide medical care,
those things troubled me.
And I kept thinking why are we not able to prevent things?
Peña says ICE shares the blame.
We set up this partnership with the private industry in a way that
was supposed to make things much more effective, much more
economical, but unfortunately it was in the execution and the monitoring,
and the auditing, we fell behind, fell short.
Immigration detention has been the private prison industry's fastest
growing sector for years.
ICE says they thoroughly investigate complaints of misconduct, and hold
contractors to high standards.
Today, about 70-percent of detained immigrants are overseen by private
companies, according to an analysis of ICE data.
We have zero tolerance for people that enter our country illegally.
With these companies already so enmeshed in immigration enforcement,
Peña says they're here to stay.
The question is where we go from here.
It's important that the government maintain good oversight of
these companies.
Because they're not citizens, they're not going to be afforded
the same protections.
We're dealing with human beings.
That's the thing not to be lost.
There are some real advantages to having the private sector.
But, like anything else, it has to be reasonably well controlled
and paid attention to.
Vigilance is the price of freedom.
Rachel Steinback says lawsuits like the one she has filed on behalf of
Cortez Diaz and some of the other hunger strikers can help hold
private companies accountable.
There's very little transparency.
So I think they, they feel like they can operate with impunity,
do whatever they want and get away with it.
Cortez Diaz is no longer in detention.
Last year, a judge granted him asylum and the opportunity to start
a new life in the United States.