Hi guys, thanks for tuning in to another video on ForgottenWeapons.com.
I am Ian McCollum, and I'm here today thanks to Movie Armaments Group,
where we are actually going to do some live fire with a US Navy SEALs pattern Stoner 63A.
I'm pretty excited to do this. I've never shot a Stoner before, heard all the hype,
really curious if it's based in reality or not.
So I've got a belt box with about 100 rounds in it,
slide that into the holder there, that holds it nice and centreline under the gun.
That's one of the improvements here in the SEALs, the Navy pattern.
Then lift the belt up into place and when I close this little cover,
that actually holds the cartridges in place so they don't fall out of the belt.
Pop that guy down. I think we're all good to go. So,
let's see how this thing runs. Yep, bolt's back.
I'm going to go with the hype is real. That is very slick.
That is one of the only machine guns that I think I've ever fired where
you can actually maintain a like totally clear sight picture while you're shooting.
It's, dang...
I would not want to go into a fight with someone armed with one of these things. These are really slick. Dang.
Alright, I need to try this thing standing.
Holy cow! This thing it's almost as slick standing as it is off the bipod, that's really impressive.
Dang!
Yeah, this thing's really slick.
I think what we need to do is actually now convert this over to the Bren gun model,
where we have, instead of a belt feed, we have a top-mounted magazine feed.
Because that's one of the configurations of Stoner that you just don't see very often.
Alright, and now we have this in Bren gun configuration.
The US Marine Corps, when they tested these guns in Vietnam,
they were actually issued out a handful of guns in the automatic rifle configuration.
And they, after just a few days, turned them back into the armoury and said it was a pointless configuration.
They wanted the rifles and they wanted the belt-fed machine guns, and not this.
Which is interesting to put in perspective today when the Marine Corps is adopting the M27 IAR, which is
this.
Let's see how it shoots.
Jeez, that is in fact absolutely, unquestionably,
even smoother than the belt-fed version. This thing just, it's like a static gun.
Now, of course, one of the benefits of a top feed is it's really easy
to work the magazines from a prone position, in a way that
bottom feed, like you would kind of want in a rifle, is a lot less convenient.
So especially if you have a two-man team, as you often would with an automatic rifle like this,
you've got a situation like a Bren or a Nambu, or any of the World War Two or earlier
top-fed mags, where one person can pop the mag off
and reload for you while the gunner remains on the sights and on target.
Man, it's really hard to exaggerate just how smooth and nice of a gun this is.
... In some ways it's pretty surprising that the Marines ditched this pattern of the rifle.
That thing just sits right dead on target.
That is smooth enough that we obviously need to try it off-hand. So we'll go ahead and do this right handed
so that you get a better view, and because the sights are actually offset on the left.
Yeah, that's a really nice, really nice automatic rifle.
Normally for a light machine gun you wouldn't expect anything to get actually better
than the belt fed ... Stoner I don't think.
But I'll be darned if this doesn't actually one-up it.
So this thing ... it's like a video game gun, almost. It just sits there on the bipod, doesn't move.
You can actually maintain a really nice crisp sight picture in full-auto fire, which is a very unusual thing.
Yup. Yeah, this is really nice.
Now there is one more pattern of Stoner that we still need to show you, and that's not the machine gun version.
That's actually the rifle or the carbine version. So we're going to go ahead and
swap this out to, I think we're going to go with the carbine version, and give that a try with some off-hand shooting.
Alright guys, we now have for you our third and final configuration of Stoner.
This one is the Stoner 63A carbine. There was of course a carbine and a rifle version.
The rifle had a 20 inch barrel, the carbine here has a 15.7 inch barrel.
And you know the cool thing about the Stoner is this is the same exact receiver, just flipped over.
So now our gas tube's on top. Instead of the charging handle being on the bottom, the charging handle is now on the top.
Alright, let's see how this shoots. We'll start with semi-auto.
You know, it's kind of funny,
it's almost a little bit anticlimactic, as a carbine.
Because the machine gun and the light automatic rifle versions are so incredibly nice and smooth,
that when you pick this up and it shoots with like actual recoil like any normal 5.56 rifle,
it's almost kind of a let down, you're like, "Oh, I thought the whole thing was just magic."
It's not quite, it's actually reality. Let me switch to auto and try a few little bursts.
That's not bad.
But I think the magic of the Stoner really is in its ... heavy barrel and bipod mounted configurations.
That's where you can really take advantage of the recoil characteristics and the weight, in particular, of this rifle.
Yeah, it's kind of funny it actually, as was just pointed out to me,
it actually kind of shoots more like an AK than an AR. Because, well, mechanically speaking
it kind of is more like an AK. It's a long stroke gas piston, rotating bolt like an AR, but
kind of shoots like an AK to be totally honest.
Well, I hope you guys enjoyed the video.
This has been a fantastic opportunity for me to get a chance to shoot the Stoner in a couple of different guises.
And of all of them,
I, boy, it's a really tough toss-up between the automatic rifle and the machine gun, the belt fed version,
because they're both really slick.
I probably have to go with the machine gun. The automatic rifle's a little bit nicer to shoot off the bipod,
But the difference between having a 30 round mag versus a 100 round belt in the gun,
and really the difference, there is a difference but it's fairly minor, and I think I would happily trade
the slightly less, I mean ... I hate to even say "less controllable",
because the belt-fed Stoner is still, (aside from the mag-fed, heavy barrel Stoner)
it's still the most controllable light machine gun I've ever fired.
I'd happily accept the belt-fed version's recoil characteristics for its ammo capacity.
If you ever have a chance to shoot a Stoner at a rental range, or have a buddy who owns one,
or hey, if you get the chance to buy one yourself, they are phenomenal rifles.
I highly recommend the bipod mounted machine gun versions, whether mag-fed or belt-fed. They're just really slick.
A big thanks to Movie Armaments Group up here in Canada for giving me the chance to shoot this.
Thanks for watching.
Oh, I'm really sorry about that, eh?
[ sub by sk cn2 ]