Anyone who goes fishing probably has a fishy story about "the one that got away."
It was this big, doncha know.
Yah, that was a bummer... but it's actually quite important that big fish get away, both
for fish and fishermen.
For most of the species that we fish, commercial and recreational fishermen are only allowed
to keep individuals above a minimum legal size.
The idea behind these laws is to protect juveniles so they can grow big enough to reproduce at
least once before becoming our dinner.
In theory, that means there will always be enough fish for dinner tomorrow.
And insuring dinner for tomorrow is important enough that the British Parliament discussed
protecting young - that is, small - fish as early as 1376, and today it's a common regulation
for fisheries worldwide.
Except, it doesn't really work.
First, large individuals have the greatest number of successful offspring both because
bigger fish produce more eggs and because the eggs they produce ALSO contain a more
generous food supply for the baby fishies.
So by removing the largest fish of a given species, we severely decrease the population's
ability to replenish itself.
Second, if we only remove the largest fish, that means fish that are small for their age
- and thus smaller when they first reproduce - are more likely to live long enough to make
babies.
So individuals with small-fish genes tend to stay in the water, reproduce, and pass
on their small-fish genes to new generations, while big fish and big-fish genes become rarer
and rarer.
We're basically breeding smaller fish, unintentionally - and it's not a small change.
Size-selective fishing has caused the body mass of large commercial fish to be cut in
half over the last 40 years - let me say that again: heavily-fished fish are now half the
weight they used to be.
Six-year-old haddock, for example, weigh 40% of what they did in 1970.
Imagine if full-grown men weighed 65-pounds!
Clearly, size-selective fishing means fewer and smaller fish in the water, which suggests
it's not the best way to keep our fish supply stocked for future human generations.
And in fact, there's a new idea called "balanced harvesting" ready to save the day.
Instead of reeling in all of the largest individuals, fishermen would catch a smaller number of
fish across a wider range of sizes, keeping the numbers and sizes of fish, well, balanced.
However, old habits die hard, and the use of size limits is deeply ingrained in our
collective fisheries management DNA.
But sooner rather than later, we'll have to accept that it's good to let some of the "big
ones" get away, for only they can change the course of fishtory.