As a child, I attended a show where a magician sawed a woman in half.
Not knowing how the mechanism worked, I leaped to the conclusion that it had to be some kind
of spiritual, mystical force of magic.
It was a false conclusion that intuitively seemed correct, but brought with it a host
of other problems, assumptions, and unanswered questions.
If you lack scientific literacy, it’s easy to postulate far-fetched alternative explanations
for how the universe works.
They may seem intuitive, but as with the magician, they bring a host of other problems, contradictions,
assumptions, and unanswered questions.
Maybe you’ve seen a flat earth conspiracy video or read a compelling anti-science blog
post, but before you dive head first into that flat world of absurdism, with help of
several other pro-science, skeptically-minded content creators, I’ve put together a list
of questions for you to think about.
When you’re done watching this, I highly recommend that you go check out and subscribe
to their channels as well.
You won’t be disappointed.
Cosmic Skeptic: “My question is this to those of you who expect to see some kind of
curvature on a globular earth with their eyes, what exact kind of curvature are you expecting
to see?
If you’re talking about the kind of curvature that goes away from us and over the horizon,
then that would be indiscernible.
It would look the same as a flat earth, because you can’t see things that are under the horizon.
If you’re talking about a kind of curvature where if you were to follow the horizon from
left to right, that you would see some kind of curvature downwards, just follow that to
its logical conclusion.
Do a 360-spin on the spot – where does that horizon end up?
It wouldn’t match up to where you started.
That makes no sense whatsoever either.
Even if you were high enough up to see some kind of curvature, all it would be is looking
down and seeing the entire earth beneath you, and any globe from one particular point of
view (because of perspective) is indistinguishable from a flat disc.
In other words, nobody has ever claimed that the kind of curvature you’re expecting to
see is what you would expect to see on a globular earth (or even that it’s possible).
Although I will say that it’s a damn sight more possible than a flat earth.”
Suris: “If you honestly want to believe that the earth is flat, I’m not going to stop you.
But I would like to ask: if you want to convince any of us (especially those of us that are
at least moderately science-minded), can you please provide a working model - a full-scale,
working model of the flat earth with accurate predictions and measurements that follow through
on that scale.
And no, I don’t mean the UN map.”
Rachel Oates: “Why is it that all the other astronomical bodies like other planets, their
orbiting moons, the sun, other stars...
Why is it that they’re all spherical, and the laws of gravity apply to them, but the
earth is somehow the odd one out?
What makes it different?”
GM Skeptic: “If gravity comes from the earth constantly accelerating upwards (not just moving quickly,
but actually constantly accelerating), where is this infinite source of energy that’s propelling it?”
Professor Stick: “Why do time lapses of stars rotate in different directions in the
northern and southern hemispheres fitting perfectly with the perspective we would expect
for a rotating round earth?”
Godless Engineer: “If Nasa’s part of a global conspiracy, the earth’s flat, and
the moon landings never happened, then how come anybody with a high-powered laser can
bounce light off of retroreflectors that the astronauts left on the moon?”
Godless Cranium: “If climate change melts the Antarctic ice wall, will all the water
fall off the edge, or will we be swarmed with white walkers?”
Eric Murphy (Talk Heathen): “Why, from the southern hemisphere,
do images of the moon appear upside down.
And you can verify the change if you drive north and south - traveling - taking pictures of the moon.
You can see that change as you move to the other side of the earth.
How do flat-earthers explain that?”
Kyle Curtis (The NonSequitur Show): “Did you know, there are over 500 people from 38
countries who have been to space.
And that there are 72 different government space agencies, 31 private spaceflight companies,
and 24 private endeavors all of which are building rovers, landers, and probes.
Now this represents tens if not hundreds of thousands of employees (Nasa alone has 17,000).
And they’re all building equipment to meticulous specifications based on universally applicable
scientific principles.
And this equipment has to travel at mind-numbing speeds.
It has to be able to sustain radiation and fluctuations in temperature.
On top of that, it has to remain airtight.
Are all of them in on it?
And if so, how many of them can keep a secret.
And if not, how are those at the top managing to fool every single one of their employees?”
Objectively Dan (Epistemic): “If the sun is rotating above the earth in a circle, then
how do you explain both solar and lunar eclipses?
And if the sun dips below the earth to cast a shadow on the moon, then how come the entire
earth is never submerged in darkness at the same time?
Instead it’s daytime in New York when it's nighttime in New Delhi.”
Steve McRae: “You say that live footage of astronauts is fake because you can’t
see stars.
But have you ever taken a picture or video of the night sky only to realize that your
camera’s sensor just isn’t sensitive enough to capture these dim balls of light without
increasing exposure time?
Did you ever notice that it’s daytime?
The freaking sun is out, of course you can’t see other stars!”
Mr. Atheist: “Additionally, if it is impossible for the earth to be round because we don’t
feel it moving at the incredible speed it’s moving, what’s preventing us from feeling
the force of the constantly acceleration flat earth as it moves upward?
And wouldn’t the sun and all of the other luminaries be having to move at the same rate
so as to not either crash into the earth or fly away forever, but why can’t we observe
that in any way?”
Bionic Dance: “Why do the stars and constellations we see in the southern hemisphere
differ from those we see in the northern hemisphere?”
Shannon Q: “When someone defends the concept of the flat earth, I’ve often heard the
argument being made that, ‘I trust my eyes.’
But we know that our eyes can deceive us.
If they couldn’t magicians and illusionists wouldn’t have careers.
In fact, everything that we do perceive visually comes into our eyes upside down, backwards,
and full of holes.
It’s our brains that do the hard work of constructing that into what we would call vision.
Why would you rely on something as fallible and subjective as visual perception and reject
more precise and reliable forms of measurement to make your argument?”
Telltale: “The Soviet Union and the US were enemies during the Cold War,
and we both had space programs.
If one side claims the earth was round, and they were wrong,
why wouldn’t the other expose them?”
Frank Wolf: “If the sun and moon aren’t dropping below a horizon
but just getting further away,
then why don’t they get all tiny just before night, and why aren’t they
absolutely gigantic when they’re right overhead?”
Paulogia: “Most astronauts were Christians, including the Apollo 8 astronauts who read
from the book of Genesis while orbiting the moon,
and Buzz Aldrin who took communion before setting foot on the moon?
If the round earth is a Satanic conspiracy,
why aren’t these Christian astronauts exposing it?”
Lloyd Evans: “Better yet, if it’s a Satanic conspiracy, why is it that the discoveries
about the true nature of our planet and its place in the cosmos made by Nicholas Copernicus,
Galileo, Hubble, and Newton - were all by devoutly religious Christians?”
Alex Legends (Emperor Atheist): “According to your model, is the moon a disc,
an ethereal light, a projection, or a hologram?
And in half of all flat earth models you have Australia all scrunched
and wider than North America?
How come flat-earthers can’t seem to agree on one model?”
Seth Andrews (Host of The Thinking Atheist): “One of the best arguments I had heard against
flat-earthers came from astrophysicist Dan Batcheldor.
In order for the flat earth theory to be correct, it would not only involve a conspiracy of
world governments, and the airline industry, and every nation’s space program, and you
know the makers and operators of all the satellites – not only them – but it would also require
a conspiracy within the flat earth movement itself.
Because if you had one flat-earther located in New York, and another one located in Los Angeles,
and you were to ask both of them about the current altitude of the sun,
the flat-earther in Los Angeles would essentially have to lie to the flat-earther in New York
for the numbers to match up.
So even within the movement itself, the flat earth movement, it simply makes no sense.”
Why do objects weigh .35% less at the equator than at the poles?
This makes sense with centrifugal force on a spinning, round globe,
but not in a flat earth model.
Now before I go, I want to give a very special thank you to all of the other YouTubers who
submitted questions and participated in this collaboration.
I’ve put all of their channel links in the video description below.
They make some of the best content on this beautiful round earth.
So what are you waiting for?
Go subscribe!
While I’ve spent the last several years immersing myself in complex scientific topics,
many of you know that I was raised in a young earth creationist family, and when it comes
to math and science-heavy topics, I still feel like I’m playing catchup.
It’s healthy skepticism based in scientific literacy that inoculates us against the dangerous
pseudoscientific claims of cult leaders or alternative medicine quacks.
When someone starts spouting nonsense about the healing effects of quantum energy
or vaguely invokes one of Einstein’s theories to push an ideology or sell a product, what better
way to counter it, than with an actual understanding of the science.
For that I highly that you check out this week’s sponsor, Brilliant.
Brilliant offers courses in everything from the basic physics of the everyday
to Einstein’s theory of special relativity using visual representations of the topics.
The best way to learn is by doing and their visual problem sets are fun and engaging.
Want to prove to a young earth creationist that the earth isn’t 6,000 years old?
They’ve got you covered!
Are flat-earthers driving you nuts?
Why not calculate the circumference of the earth?
You can sign up for free to try out their basic courses, but if you’re really serious
about taking your science education to the next level, I recommend that you go premium
and get full access to their entire library of courses!
Go to Brilliant.org/holykoolaid to sign up today.
And as a special thank you to all my viewers, the first 200 people who sign up will get
20% off an annual membership!
Thanks, and as always, Dare to be curious!
But don’t drink the Koolaid.