♪
HELLO, I AM MARK LEVIN AND THIS
IS LIFE, LIBERTY.
YOU SEEM TO SPECTACLE, I WANT TO
DIG INTO THIS AND THE THREAT OF
ASSASSINATION AGAINST THE
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
YOU HEARD THESE WORDS OFF IN THE
PAST FEW DAYS, INSURRECTION,
DEMOCRACY, PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF
POWER.
WHAT WORDS HAVEN’T YOU HEARD
FROM THIS COMMITTEE?
SHOW TRIAL, STAR CHAMBER,
TIERNEY OF THE LEGISLATURE,
SEPARATION OF POWER.
IN COURTROOMS, IS ALL KINDS OF
RULES, BASED ON THE TRUISM
JUSTICE, TRUTH AND FAIRNESS, IT
REQUIRES THE ABILITY OF THEM TO
EFFECTIVELY DEFEND HIMSELF OR
HERSELF.
WE HAVE A JOY OF PEERS,
GOVERNMENT LAWYER, DEFENDANT HAS
A LAWYER, RULES OF EVIDENCE THAT
APPLIES TO BOTH SIDES, DISCOVERY
A SPECIAL USE THE AND ETC.
IT’S BUILT ON 4000 YEARS OF
HUMAN EXPERIENCE.
THE MAGNA CARTA, GREAT WESTERN
REFORMATION AND IT WAS REFINED
BY THE FOUNDING FATHERS IN THE
BILL OF RIGHTS.
WHEN OUR CONSTITUTION
ESTABLISHED THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, IT WAS CREATED
AS A SINGLE ONLY FEDERAL RANCH
ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE.
WE HAVE A REPUBLICAN TO THE
EXTENT TO WHICH THE PEOPLE HAVE
A DIRECT ROLE IN THE GOVERNMENT
SUPPOSED TO BE THROUGH THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR AT LEAST
WAS.
THE BODY IN WHICH THE PEOPLE,
ALL PEOPLE ARE REPRESENTED, NOT
JUST MAJORITY.
IT WAS TO BE A BODY IN WHICH THE
MARTY HAD THE POWER, MINORITY HAD A ROLE.
THEY HAVE A MINORITY NUMBER OF
SEATS.
THEY HAVE STAYS IN THE ROBERTS
RULES OF EVIDENCE THAT APPLIES
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
IS SUPPOSED TO BE A
PARTICIPATORY SYSTEM.
SO THE MINORITY AS THE FOUNDERS
BELIEVE FOR 200 YEARS OF
PRACTICE WHILE THEY CAN’T
CONTROL THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE
AND OTHER ELEMENTS, THEY HAVE A
SAY.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE?
THEIR PURPOSE IS TO ENSURE THAT
EVERYONE HAS AT LEAST SOME VOICE
IN THE GOVERNMENT OVER THEIR
LIVES, TO ENSURE TRANQUILITY
EVEN WHEN YOU HAVE A DIVERSE
POLITICAL SYSTEM WITH A LOT OF
VOICES TO AVOID THE TIERNEY OF
THE MAJORITY, TIERNEY OF THE
LEGISLATURE IN THE COURTROOM YOU
WANT OPPOSITION TO GET TO THE
TRUTH, THE LEGISLATURE
OPPOSITION NOT SO MUCH TO GET TO
THE TRUTH BUT TO THE OTHER SIDE
HAS SAY, REPRESENTATION.
WE HAVE SEPARATION OF POWERS
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONGRESS
EXISTS TO RAISE MONEY, BORROW,
SPEND AND LEGISLATE.
CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO CONDUCT
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, NONE
WHATSOEVER.
THAT IS NOT THEIR LANE, THEIR
PLANE IS TO LEGISLATE AND ENSURE
THE FRAMERS BELIEVE WE WOULDN’T
BE CRIMINALIZING THIS.
THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION
ALL OVER THE WORLD, THEY LOOK TO
HISTORY.
THE JUDEO CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE. THEY LOOKED AT ROME, THEY LOOKED
THEY LOOKED AT ROME, THEY LOOKED
AT BRITTON.
THEY LOOKED AT GERMANY, THEY
LOOKED AT FRANCE.
THEY LOOKED AT THE GREAT
PHILOSOPHERS AND CAME UP WITH
THE MOST FANTASTIC CONSTITUTION
EVER KNOWN TO MAN.
WE HAVE TO SUPREME COURT, THE
ONLY COURT SPECIFICALLY
MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION,
NO MENTION OF THE APPELLATE
COURT, DISTRICT COURT OR
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OR ANY
OTHER, THE SUPREME COURT IS IN
ARTICLE THREE BY NAME AS IS THE
CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED
STATES, THE ONLY ONE.
THREE BRANCHES OF POWER.
HE SAID OVER AND OVER HOW
IMPORTANT IT IS TO HAVE THREE
BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ALL SET
UP SO WE THE PEOPLE CAN SURVIVE
IN A CIVIL SOCIETY AND THAT WE
HAVE RIGHTS, TOO.
NOW NONE OF THIS HAS BEEN
DISCUSSED BY THIS JANUARY 6
COMMITTEE.
WHY?
EVERY SINGLE THING I JUST TOLD
YOU IS BEING REJECTED.
HOOK, LINE AND SINKER.
INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT PROTECTED,
INDIVIDUALS HAD NO DUE PROCESS
RIGHTS, THIS COMMITTEE CONDUCTS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL PARALLEL
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION GOING
THROUGH THE BACK DOOR TO GET
AROUND THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND
OTHER PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION
TO A POLITICIZED DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL, IT
JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL, IT
IS APPALLING IS OUTRAGEOUS.
THIS COMMITTEE IS MADE UP OF ALL
DEMOCRATS, THEY KEEP TALKING
ABOUT TO REPUBLICANS, THESE ARE
FIGUREHEADS.
NEVER TRAVERSE, THE MOST ZEALOUS
ON THE COMMITTEE.
CHENEY AND KINZINGER, THEY ARE
ON THE OUTSIDE OF THEIR OWN
PARTY AND TRYING TO EVEN THE
SCORE.
THERE’S NO WAY POSSIBLE A
COMMITTEE STRUCTURE LIKE THIS
WITH EVERY PERSON DISAPPOINTED
BY THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, A
FOUR -- FIVE VOTE IN THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES, SPEAKER OF
THE HOUSE BECAUSE OF THEIR
LOYALTY EITHER TO HER OR THEIR
HATE FOR THE PRIOR PRESIDENT,
DONALD TRUMP.
THERE’S NO WAY WE CAN GET TO THE
TRUTH FOR THIS COMMITTEE AND
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE
HEARING?
THE PURPOSE OF A HEARING IS NOT
TO PRESENT A HOLLYWOOD PRODUCED
SHOW TRIAL.
THE PURPOSE IS TO GARNER
INFORMATION.
THEY SAY THEY HAD 1000 WITNESSES
AND 140,000 DOCUMENT.
1000 WITNESSES AND 140,000
DOCUMENTS?
IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHAT?
HAD TO PROTECT THE CAPITOL
BUILDING?
1000 WITNESSES BUT YET THEY
COULDN’T CALL ONE MORE, NANCY
PELOSI TO EXPLAIN WHAT SHE DID
OR DIDN’T DO OR MORE INFORMATION
IN FOR COMING OUT HOW
INCOMPETENT AND IRRESPONSIBLE
NANCY PELOSI WAS.
HER FAILURE TO PROTECT THAT
BUILDING.
THIS IS A SHAM, IT WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS A DARK MARK ON THE
IN HISTORY AS A DARK MARK ON THE
AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM.
WE CAN’T SEE IT NOW, THE MOB IS
IN CONTROL, THE MOB RUNS THE
MEDIA, THE PROPAGANDA IS FULL
THROATED, CAN’T BE IT NOW BUT
HISTORY HAS A WAY OF SOBERING
EVENTS.
WE WILL SEE THIS ONE-DAY IS THE
OUTRAGEOUS ATTACK ON OUR SYSTEM
ON THE PRIOR PRESIDENT, ON
SCORES OF PEOPLE THAT IT TRULY
IS.
IT’S AN ABOMINATION TO THE
AMERICAN SYSTEM NOT JUST OF
JUSTICE BUT CONGRESSIONAL AND
REPRESENTED SYSTEM.
AS YOU KNOW THERE WAS WAS TO BE
AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON THE
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CAPITOL,
BRETT KAVANAUGH.
HE WAS TURNED INTO THE ENEMY OF
THE STATE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
BY THE WASHINGTON POST, BY
PEOPLE BEARING FALSE WITNESS AND
BY OTHERS DAY IN AND DAY OUT.
KAVANAUGH, THAT WAS THE GOAL.
TO DEHUMANIZE HIM, DESTROY HIM.
THAT WAS THE GOAL IN THE WAR
AGAINST CLARENCE THOMAS, IS NOW
THE GOAL AGAINST THE SUPREME
COURT UNLESS OF COURSE THE LEFT
CONTROLS THE COURT AND ITS
INDEPENDENT AND THEY WORSHIP IT
TO MOVIES ABOUT THE JUSTICES BUT
NOT NOW BECAUSE THE LEFT NOSE IS
NOT GOING TO GET THE DECISIONS
IT WANTS.
IT INSISTED ON WINNING.
KAVANAUGH’S LIFE, POTENTIAL LIFE
AS A FAMILY WAS THREATENED JUST
A FEW DAYS AGO.
WHY WERE THEY THREATENED?
AMONG OTHER REASONS, THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THEIR MEDIA
MOUTHPIECE SAID SOME THINGS
ABOUT THIS COURT AND ABOUT
KAVANAUGH THAT WOULD CAUSE BLOOD
TO BOIL OF ANY PSYCHOPATH, BLOOD
BOILING OF PEOPLE WHO AREN’T
PSYCHOPATHS.
WE’VE NEVER HAD A PERSISTENT
CONSTANT THREAT FROM JUSTICES OF
THE SUPREME COURT.
NOT ONLY THAT, THE DEMOCRAT
PARTY AND SO MANY OF ITS MEMBERS
AND MEDIA ARE ON RECORD THEY
WANT TO DESTROY THE INDEPENDENCE
OF THE COURT, THEY WANT TO PACK
THE COURT.
THEY WANT TO ELIMINATE THE
FILIBUSTER SO THEY CAN INFLUENCE
THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COURT.
THIS IS A DISASTER BUT THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY IS DOING IT.
REACHING BACK TO DONALD TRUMP,
THIS IS THIRD WORLD TYPE, THIS IS WHAT STALIN AND THE OTHER
IS WHAT STALIN AND THE OTHER
MANIACS HAVE DONE.
THAT IS TRY TO TAKE PEOPLE OUT
OF POLITICAL POWER AND DESTROY
THEM SO THEY CAN NEVER COME BACK
BACK, SO THEIR VOICES CAN BE
HEARD.
SMEAR THE PEOPLE WHO BACK THEN
AND SO FORTH AND SO ON.
THERE IS AN OVERLAY HERE.
I WANT YOU TO LISTEN TO WHAT
DONALD TRUMP SAID JANUARY 6,
2021.
THE.
>> WE HAVE COME TO DEFEND THE
CONGRESS, DO THE RIGHT THING AND
ONLY COUNT THE ELECTORS WHO HAVE
BEEN LOCALLY SLATED, LOCALLY
SLATED.
I KNOW EVERYONE HERE WILL SOON
BE MARCHING OVER TO THE CAPITOL
BUILDING TO PEACEFULLY AND
PATRIOTICALLY MAKE YOUR VOICES
HEARD, TODAY WE WILL SEE WHETHER
REPUBLICANS STAND STRONG FOR
INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTIONS OR
WHETHER OR NOT THEY STAND STRONG
FOR OUR COUNTRY.
>> THAT’S ABOUT US PASSIVE A
STATEMENT YOU COULD POSSIBLY
MAKE. PEACEFULLY AND PATRIOTICALLY.
PEACEFULLY AND PATRIOTICALLY.
DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A MAN
LEADING AN INSURRECTION?
EVEN MORE THAN THAT, WE HAVE ON
RECORD NUMEROUS PEOPLE THAT
PRESIDENT TRUMP OFFERED NATIONAL
GUARDSMEN THE CAPITOL TO PELOSI
FOUR DAYS BEFORE JANUARY 6, 4
DAYS BEFORE JANUARY 6.
THESE TWO ISSUES ALONE WOULD
UNDERMINE COMPLETELY THE ENTIRE
PURPOSE OF THIS COMMITTEE WHICH
IS WHY THEY HAVE TO HAVE 1000
WITNESSES AND 140,000 DOCUMENTS.
THEY WANT 1000 PIECES TO PUT
PICS TOGETHER IN E-MAILS AND
HAVE MUSIC AND SHOW THE VIOLENCE
FROM THE GROUP BREAK INTO THE
CAPITOL AND THEN TRIED TO TURN
INTO A DONALD TRUMP EVENT.
THAT’S WHAT REPUBLICANS DO AND
WHAT HOLLYWOOD DOES AND WHAT OUR
MEDIA DOES WITH THE RUSSIAN
COLLISION AND THE REST.
I WANT YOU TO HEAR WHAT CHUCK
SCHUMER SAID MARCH 2020 ABOUT
THE SUPREME COURT, TO JUSTICES
AND KEEP IN MIND THE COMPARISON
OF THE TWO, THE VOICE OF DONALD
TRUMP, THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HE
SAID, PEACEFULLY AND
PATRIOTICALLY.
NOW LISTEN TO CHUCK SCHUMER.
>> I WANT TO TELL YOU KAVANAUGH,
YOU HAVE RELEASED A WHIRLWIND
AND YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE. [CHEERING]
IF YOU GO FORWARD WITH THESE
DECISIONS.
>> YOU WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT YOU
IF YOU GO FORWARD WITH THESE
DECISIONS.
HE’S NOT ONLY OBSTRUCTING THE
WORK OF THE COURT AND TRYING TO
INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME, YOU WON’T
KNOW WHAT HIT YOU?
THIS IS VIOLENT LANGUAGE.
CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT THIS
COMMITTEE WOULD DO WITH THAT
LANGUAGE IF THOSE WORDS WERE OUT
OF BY DONALD TRUMP JANUARY 6?
BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT HAPPENED.
THERE WAS A COMPLAINT FILED BY
THE LEGAL FOUNDATION WITH THE
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
ETHICS HEADED BY SENATORS COONS
AND LANGFORD.
TALKING ABOUT SPECIFICALLY THE
THREAT MADE BY SCHUMER AND HOW
UNHINGED INDIVIDUAL MIGHT VIEW
THIS AS A CALL TO VIOLENCE.
THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS
IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE DID
NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
SUPREME COURT TODAY EVEN AS I
SPEAK THREATENED VIOLENCE.
FINALLY IT’S A FEDERAL LAW, MOST
OF YOU HAVE MEMORIZED IT BY NOW,
CODE SECTION 1507, YOU’RE NOT
ALLOWED TO QUOTE ON QUOTE
PEACEFULLY PROTEST AT THE HOME
OF JUSTICE, THAT IS THE LAW.
IT TOOK ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED
STATES WEEKS, WEEKS TO BEEF UP
SECURITY FOR THESE JUSTICES.
WEEKS AND HE HASN’T PROSECUTED A
SINGLE PERSON WHO’S COMMITTED A
FELONY, NOT ONE.
CHUCK SCHUMER, WE HAVE AUDIO,
VIDEO AND NANCY PELOSI WITH THE
AUDIO, AND THE VIDEO, BOTH OF
THEM INTERROGATED THEIR MOB TO
GO TO THOSE HOUSES, BREAK
FEDERAL LAW, COMMIT FELONIES AND
INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF A
SUPREME COURT DECISION THAT
STRUCK THE WORK OF THE COURT.
I DON’T BELIEVE ANY OF THEM HAVE
BEEN CHARGED WITH ANYTHING, NO
HANDCUFFS, NO.
NONE OF THAT.
WHAT WE ARE FACING NOW IS THE
TIERNEY OF THE LEGISLATURE’S.
YOU ARE WITNESSING IT TO NANCY
PELOSI WHO FAILED TO PROTECT THE
CAPITOL BUILDING AS OF TODAY
FAILED TO PROTECT SUPREME COURT
JUSTICES FROM PAST UNANIMOUSLY
BY SENATE, AS OF MY SPEAKING
RIGHT HERE FOR ALMOST TWO MONTHS
SHE’S DONE NOTHING WITH IT.
WHY?
BECAUSE SHE WANTS THE SUPREME
COURT DAMAGED, SHE DISAGREES