Stepan Razin saved the Slavs from the Romanovs
Link to article in description
No matter how foreign the invaders of Russia the truth,
but she still escapes to freedom.
The Romanovs lie about Stepan Razin is also gradually
comes out into the light.
According to the foreigners-Romanovs - Stepan Razin is a thief and a murderer,
uprising the mob against legitimate rulers
Russia.
Actually Stepan Razin was a representative of the true
rulers of Russia and fought with foreign invaders
The Romanovs, whom the west put cunning on the throne.
Stepan Razin is a folk hero who fought
for the independence of Russia.
The enemy of the Slavs Romanov even the army consisted of
foreign mercenaries since the whole Russian people
supported Razin.
Razin was the governor himself the world's largest Slavic
the state of Tartaria.
But the true name of Razin thoroughly cleaned by historians
- the servants of the Romanovs.
The Romanovs did everything to distort the truth about the fight
Slavs with invaders, therefore real Russians
heroes always blacken enemies and foreigners to this
day rule Russia.
Let's see what they say to us about Stepan Razin ...
When Alexei Mikhailovich in Russia in 1667 flared up
rebellion the uprising of Stepan Razin.
This rebellion is also called peasant war.
The official version is as follows.
Peasants with Cossacks rebelled against the landowners
and the king.
The rebellion lasted four long years covering large areas
imperial Russia but efforts authorities were still suppressed.
What do we know today about Stepan Timofeevich Razin?
Hailing Stepan Razin as and Emelyan Pugachev, was from
Winter Village.
Original Razintse documents, who lost this war
almost not preserved.
The official believes that they would have survived only 6-7 pieces.
But historians themselves say which of these 6-7 documents
only one can be considered original, although he is extremely
doubtful and more like to the draft.
And the fact that this document was not composed by ourselves
Razin, and his companions, far from
his main bet on the Volga, no doubt arises
who.
Russian historian V.I.
Buganov in his work "Razin and razintsy", referring
to the multivolume collection academic documents
about the Razin uprising, wrote that the vast
most of these documents came out of government
Romanov camps.
Hence the silence of the facts, and bias in their
lighting, and even direct False.
What the rebels demanded from rulers?
Razintsy are known to have performed under the banner of the great war
for the Russian sovereign against traitors - Moscow
boyars.
Historians explain this, strange at first glance
the slogan is that razintsy were very naive and wanted
protect poor Alexey Mikhailovich from their own
bad boyars in Moscow.
But in one of Razin’s Letters there is such a text:
This year, in October 179 on day 15 by decree of the great
sovereign and his literacy, great sovereign, come out
we great Don army with Don to him, the great sovereign
to serve us from them traitors boyars
do not perish completely.
Note that the name in the letter Alexei Mikhailovich not
mentioned.
Historians consider this detail insignificant.
In other letters razintsy express clearly
neglect to the Romanov authorities
and all their actions and documents they call thieves,
those. illegal.
A clear contradiction arises here.
For some reason, the rebels did not recognize Alexei Mikhailovich
Romanov's rightful ruler Russia, but they go to fight for it.
Who was Stepan Razin?
Suppose Stepan Razin was not just Cossack
the chieftain, and the governor of the sovereign, but not Alexei Romanov.
How can this be?
Following the new chronology, after the great turmoil and coming
to the power of the Romanovs in Muscovy, Southern part of Russia with the capital
in Astrakhan to invaders did not swear.
Governor of Astrakhan Tsar and was Stepan Timofeevich.
Presumably Astrakhan the ruler was from the kind of princes
Cherkasy.
Name him today impossible due to total
distortions of history by order Romanovs, but suggest
can...
Cherkasy were from old Russian-Ardynian clans
and were descendants of the Egyptian sultans.
This is reflected on the coat of arms of Cherkassky kind of.
It is known that from 1380 to 1717 Circassian ruled in Egypt
the sultans.
Today historical Cherkasy mistakenly placed on North
Caucasus, adding, that at the end of the XVI century. this name
disappears from historical arenas.
But it is well known that in Russia until the XVIII century.
the word "Cherkasy" was called Dnieper Cossacks.
Regarding the presence one of the princes of Cherkasy
in Razin’s troops then this can be confirmed.
Even in Romanov’s processing history brings us
information that in the army of Razin there was a certain Cherkashenin Alexey
Grigoryevich, one of the Cossack chieftains named brother
Stepan Razin.
Perhaps it’s about the prince Grigory Suncheleevich
Cherkassky, who served as governor in Astrakhan before the beginning of the Razin
war, but after the victory of the Romanovs he was killed in his estate
in 1672.
Fracture in the war.
Victory in this war was given. Romanov is not easy.
As is known from the cathedral provisions of 1649 king
Alexey Romanov set unlimited attachment
peasants to land, i.e. approved serfdom in Russia.
Razin's campaigns on the Volga accompanied by ubiquitous
serf revolts peasants.
Following the Russian peasants huge groups revolted
other Volga peoples: Chuvash, Mari, etc.
But besides the common population passed to the side of Razin
and the Romanov troops!
German newspapers of the time they wrote: "To Razin hit
so many strong troops that Alexei Mikhailovich
so scared that didn't want to send anymore
troops against him. "
Turn the tide of the war by Romanov succeeded with great difficulty.
It is known that Romanov had to staff
Western European troops mercenaries because
after frequent transitions to the side of Razin, near the Romanovs
Tatar and Russian troops were considered unreliable.
Razintsy, on the contrary, attitude towards foreigners
it was, to say the least, bad.
Captive foreign mercenaries Cossacks killed.
All these big events historians present only
as the suppression of the peasant riot.
This version has become active be introduced by the Romanovs
immediately after his victory.
Special were made diplomas, the so-called "Sovereigns
exemplary "in which there was official version
Razin uprising.
It was ordered to read the letter in places at the cottage
not once.
But if the four-year standoff was just a rebellion
mobile, then against the Romanovs rebelled most
countries.
On the reconstruction of Fomenko-Nosovsky the so-called Razin's rebellion was
major war between the south Astrakhan kingdom
and controlled by Romanov parts of Belaya Rus, northern
Volga and Veliky Novgorod.
This hypothesis is confirmed. and Western European documents.
IN AND.
Buganov leads very interesting document.
It turns out the rebellion in Russia, led by
Different, caused a huge resonance in Western Europe.
Foreign informants talked about events
in Russia as a struggle for power, for the throne.
It is also interesting that Razin's revolt was called Tatar
rebellion.
The end of the war and the execution of Razin.
In November 1671, Astrakhan was captured by the Romanovs
troops.
This date is considered the end. war.
However, the circumstances rout of Astrakhan, practically
unknown.
Razin is believed to result from betrayal was captured
and executed in Moscow.
But even in the capital of Romanov did not feel safe.
Jacob Reitenfels, an eyewitness executions of Razin, reports:
In order to prevent unrest, whom the king feared
area on which the offender suffered punishment, was by
by order of the king is surrounded triple row of the most devoted
soldier.
And only foreigners were allowed in the middle of the fenced off
places.
And at the crossroads around the city was a detachment of mercenaries.
The Romanovs made a lot efforts to detect
and destroy the unwanted documents of the Razin side.
About how carefully them wanted, says such
fact.
Interrogated Frol (Jr. Razin’s brother) showed that
Razin buried a jug with documents on the island of the Don River, on
tract on the breakthrough under the willow.
Romanov troops shoveled whole island but nothing so
not found.
Frol was executed only through several years probably
trying to get from him more accurate information about
documents.
Probably documents about Razinsky war were stored in Kazan,
and in the Astrakhan archives, but alas, these archives are without a trace
have disappeared.
Apparently, those invaders, that to this day rule
Russia is very disadvantageous if the Slavs find out the truth
about your story.
I want to remind you that mine opinion does not always coincide
with the opinion of the author of the article