A rectangular storage container with an open top
needs to have a volume of 10 cubic meters.
The length of its base is twice the width.
Material for the base costs $10 per square meter.
Material for the sides costs $6 per square meter.
Find the cost of the material for the cheapest container.
So let's draw this open storage container,
this open rectangular storage container.
So it's going to have an open top.
So let me draw its open top as good as I can.
So it's going to have an open top.
That's the top of my container.
And then let me draw the sides.
Just like that.
So it might look something like that.
And then I could draw-- and since it's open top,
I can see through, I could see the inside of the container
as well.
So the container would look something like that.
And so what do they tell us?
They tell us that the volume needs to be 10 cubic meters.
So let me write that down.
The volume needs to be equal to 10 meters cubed.
The length of its base is twice the width.
So the length, let's call the width x,
so the length is going to be twice that.
It's going to be 2x.
That's what they tell us right over here.
They tell us the material for the base
costs $10 per square meter.
So this area right over here-- [INAUDIBLE]
if I was transparent I could continue to draw it down here.
But this right over here, that material
costs $10 per square meter.
Let me label that $10 per square meter.
And then they say material for the sides
costs $6 per square meter.
So the material over here costs $6 per meter squared.
So let's see if we can come up with a value
or how much this box would cost to make as a function of x.
But x only gives us the dimensions of the base.
We also need a dimension for height.
So it'll be a function of x and height for now.
So let's write h as the height right over here.
So what is the cost of this container going to be?
So the cost is going to be equal to the cost of the base.
Well, the cost of the base is going to be $10 times--
I'll just write 10.
This is going to be 10 times the area of the base.
Well, what's the area of the base?
Well, it's going to be the width times the length.
So 10 times x times 2x.
That is the cost of base.
And now what's going to be the cost of the sides?
Well, the different sides are going
to have different dimensions.
You have this side over here and this side
over here, which have the same dimension.
They both have an area of x times h.
You have x times h.
And then our material is $6 per square meter.
So it's 6 times x times h would be the cost of one
of these side panels.
So for two of them we have to multiply by 2.
So plus 2 times 6 times h.
And then we have these two side panels.
We have this side panel right over here
and we have this side panel right over here.
The area of each of them is going to be 2x times h.
So it's going to be 2x times h.
The cost of the material is going to be 6.
So the cost of one of the panels is
going to be $6 per square meters times 2xh meters squared.
But we have two of these panels.
One panel and two panels.
So we have to multiply by 2.
And so we will get-- so this is right over here,
this is the cost of the sides.
And so let's see if we can simplify this.
And I'll write it all in a neutral color.
So this is going to be equal to 10.
Let's see.
10 times 2 is 20.
x times x is x squared.
And then you have 2 times 6 times xh.
So this is going to be plus 12xh.
And then this is going to be 2 times 6, which
is 12 times 2 is 24xh plus 24xh.
So this is going to be equal to 20x squared plus 36xh.
So this is going to be my cost.
But I'm not ready to optimize it yet.
We don't know how to optimize with respect to two variables.
We only know how to optimize with respect to one variable,
and maybe I'll say let's optimize with respect to x.
But if we want to optimize with respect to x,
we have to express h as a function of x.
So how can we do that?
How can we express h as a function of x?
Well, we know that the volume has to be 10 cubic meters.
So we know that x, the width times the length times 2x times
the height times h needs to be equal to 10.
Or another way of saying that, this tells us
that 2x squared h, 2x squared times h
needs to be equal to 10.
And so if we want h as a function of x,
we just divide both sides by 2x squared.
And we get h is equal to 10 over 2x squared.
Or we could say that h is equal to 5 over x squared.
And then we can substitute back right over here.
h is equal to 5 over x squared.
So all of this business is going to be equal to 20 times
x squared plus 36 times x times 5 over x squared.
So our cost as a function of x is going to be 20x
squared 36 times 5.
Let's see, 30 times 5 is 150 plus
another 30 is going to be 180.
So it's going to be plus 180 times, let's see,
x times x to the negative 2, 180x to the negative x
to the negative 1 power.
So we finally have cost as a function of x.
Now we're ready to optimize.
To optimize, we just have to figure out
what are the critical points here
and whether those critical points are
a minimum or a maximum value.
So let's see what we can do.
So to find a critical point, we take the derivative, figure
out where the derivative is undefined or equal to 0,
and those are our candidate critical points.
And then from the critical points
we find, they might be minimum or maximum values.
So the derivative of c of our cost with respect to x
is going to be equal to 40 times x minus 180 times x
to the negative 2 power.
Now, this seems-- well it's defined for all x
except for x equaling 0.
But x equaling 0 is not interesting to us
as a critical point because then we're
going to have a degenerate.
This is going to have no base at all.
So we don't want to worry about that critical point.
We would have no volume at all, so it would not work out.
And actually, if x equals 0 then our height
is undefined as well.
So this was defined for everything else,
for anything other than x equals 0.
So let's see when this derivative is
equal to 0 in our search for our potential critical points.
So when does-- I'll do it over here.
When does 40x minus 180x to the negative 2 equal 0?
Well, we could add the 180x to the negative 2 to both sides.
We get 40x is equal to 180.
And I could write it as 180 over x squared.
Now let's see.
We could multiply both sides of this equation by x squared
and we would get 40x to the third is equal to 180.
Divide both sides by 40.
You get x to the third is equal to 180 over 40,
which is the same thing as 18 over 4,
which is the same thing as 9 over 2.
And so if we want to solve for x,
we get that x is equal to a critical point.
We get a critical point of x is equal to 9/2 to the 1/3 power,
the cube root of 9/2.
So let's see.
Let's get an approximate value for what that is.
So if we take 9/2, 9 divided by 2--
I guess you could call that 4.5--
and we want to raise it to the 1/3 power.
To the 1/3 power we get 1.65.
So it's approximately equal to 1.65 as our critical point.
Now the way the problem is asked,
we're only getting one legitimate critical point here.
So that's probably going to be the x at which we
achieve a minimum value.
But let's use our second derivative test just in case
to make sure that we're definitely
concave upwards over here, in which case, this will
definitely be the x value at which we
achieve a minimum value.
So the second derivative.
I'll do it right over here.
The second derivative of our cost function
is just the derivative of this, which
is going to be equal to 40 minus 180 times negative 2, which
is negative 360.
So it's going to be plus 360 over x to the 3.
The derivative of this is negative 2 times negative 180,
which is positive 360x to the negative 3 power, which
is exactly this right over here.
So when x is equal to 1.65, this is going to be positive.
This is going to be positive.
So let me write this down. c prime prime of 1.65
is definitely greater than 0.
So we're definitely concave upwards when x is 1.65.
Concave upwards, which means that our graph is
going to look something like this.
And so where the derivative equal
to 0, which is right over there, we are at a minimum point.
We are minimizing our cost.
And so if we go back to the question, the only thing
that we have to do now-- We know the x value
that minimizes our cost.
We now have to find the cost of the material for the cheapest
container.
So we just have to figure out what our cost is.
And we already know what our cost
is as a function of x, so we just
have to put 1.65 into this equation.
Evaluate the function at 1.65.
So let's do that.
Our cost is going to be equal to 20 times 1.65.
I should say approximately equal to,
because I'm using an approximation
of this original value.
1.65 squared plus 180.
I could say divided by 1.65.
That's the same thing as multiplying
by 1.65 to the negative 1.
So divided by 1.65, which is equal to 163.
I'll just say $163.5.
So it's approximately.
So the cost-- let me do this in a new color.
We deserve a drum roll now.
The cost when x is 1.65 is approximately equal to $163.54.
So $163.54, which is quite an expensive box.
So this is kind of expensive.
This is fairly expensive material here.
Although it's a fairly large box.
1.65 meters in width, and it's going
to be twice that in length.
And then you could figure out what its height is going to be.
Although it's not going to be too tall.
5 divided by 1.65 squared.
I don't know, it'll be roughly a little under two meters tall.
So it actually is quite a large box made out
of quite expensive material.
The minimum cost to make this box is going to be $163.54.