Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe,
brought to you by The Thunderbolts Project™
at Thunderbolts.info
A new scientific report may provide stunning support for the role of a form
of electric current called a Birkeland current on the cosmological scale.
A team of scientists using the ALMA telescope to study the doughnut-shaped cloud of
gas and dust at the center of the galaxy NGC 1068 made a shocking discovery -- two
separate disks of gas and dust are rotating in opposite directions.
Phys.org reports on the team's discovery, "Unexpectedly, they found two
counter-rotating disks of gas. The inner disk spans two to four light-years and
follows the rotation of the galaxy, whereas the outer disk (also known as the
torus) spans 4 to 22 light years and is rotating the opposite way."
The lead author of a paper on the discovery states, "We did not expect to see this,
because gas falling into a black hole would normally spin around it in only
one direction. Something must have disturbed the flow,
because it is impossible for a part of the disk
to start rotating backward all on its own."
Those who have followed this series might understand
the potential significance of this discovery.
In 2015, retired professor of electrical
engineering Dr. Donald Scott published his mathematical model of the structure
of a Birkeland current, which he identified visually as counter-rotating
cylinders, and it's being seen at vastly different scales in the cosmos, from
galaxies to planetary aurorae.
We asked Dr. Scott for his thoughts on this latest discovery.
Well, a week or two ago, National Radio Astronomy Observatory
announced their again of course, "unexpected discovery" that in another
galaxy, it happens to be M 77, the galactic disk was experiencing counter-rotation.
While the part of the disk that is closest to the center of
the galaxy rotates in one direction, the outer regions of the disk rotate
in the opposite direction, and so there is counter rotation.
And the only explanation they could offer was that,
"...counter rotation always results from the collision or interaction
between two galaxies. What makes this result remarkable is that we see it on a
much smaller scale, tens of light-years instead of thousands from the central black hole."
And of course, their amazement is the result of two different errors
that are actually compounding each other and making the whole thing worse.
The first is, since they still refuse to acknowledge the existence of any
electrical effects in the cosmos, the only tool available to them is the
attractive force of gravity.
So of course, they declare that any case of counter-
rotation has to be caused by some sort of collision or near collision or near-
miss or something like that.
And the second error, expressly in this press release but in other places of course as
well, they repeat the self-contradictory idea that black holes that suck in
matter due to a singularity -- that's an infinite concentration of matter which
is impossible -- they also spit out matter at incredibly high speeds up to
five hundred kilometers per second, which is more than a million miles an hour.
It's all getting sucked in, how can it be blasted out again?
But anyway, how can this have anything at all to do with the
counter rotation in this particular case is not really discussed.
I feel that their mentioning of the black hole
that exists there is just a red herring to distract the reader from asking the
obvious question, how do you explain the counter rotation in the first place?
And I submit, there is no known scientific process that naturally produces two
concentric discs that rotate in opposite directions, other than the natural
counter-rotation that occurs within a Birkeland current.
It's just that simple.
So very similarly in another case I'm familiar with, there is a galaxy NGC
4550, and a well-known British astronomer tried to explain an earlier
case of galactic counter-rotation in this galaxy by saying that another
galaxy that was spinning in the other direction must have come close to or
collided with the first galaxy.
And anyway, I discussed this in an earlier paper that I published.
But the reason the counter-rotation of stars within a galaxy hasn't been discovered as
often as it might, I suggest, is because 1) the galaxy has to be oriented
in such a way that the red-blue shift that reveals the counter-rotation can be measured.
It has to be oriented so that it can be measured.
For example, galaxies that are face-on to us will
not show spectral evidence of counter- rotation, because it takes the stars,
the stars that are involved have to be moving at least partially toward us
and then away from us as they rotate around the galaxy, and that'll be so
if the galaxy is at an angle but not face on.
But also, in my estimation, the primary reason that this hasn't been discovered,
as much as it's seemingly being discovered now, is that it's easy not to
see something if you don't really want to see it.
And so we do know of the existence of several galaxies within
which counter-rotation has been measured, but in the explanation, none of them have
a satisfactory explanation if electrical phenomena such as Birkeland current
structure are intentionally excluded and ignored.
And by the way, if you do a web search, anyone who sees this, just go
ahead and do a web search using a search engine on 'galactic web' and if you do
that well, I just did this morning as a matter of fact, and I found a Wikipedia
description of the galactic web and it says the following, "In the standard
model of the evolution of the universe, galactic filaments form along and follow
web-like structures of dark matter. It is thought that this dark matter
dictates the structure of the universe on the grandest of scales. Dark matter
gravitationally attracts normal matter and it is this normal matter that
astronomers see forming long thin walls of super-galactic clusters."
Well of course, what they're missing is that the
strings are made up of plasma and the formation of filaments is a very normal
thing within a plasma.
That has nothing to do with dark matter or anything else, any other fairy dust
they conjure up to explain what they can't normally explain.
It can't be explained without thinking about electricity up there.
Anyway, they confidently say these kinds of things about dark matter as if
they actually have seen some and measured what its properties are.
Maybe they will now say, dark matter causes things to spin!
They haven't said that one before, but that's a possibility.
Anyway, the filaments that make up the galactic web undoubtedly consist of plasma in the
form of force-free currents.
They carry electric currents to and from the galaxies that form along them and when
these filaments emit visible light, they're then properly called Birkeland currents.
And we've talked a lot about Birkeland currents here on Space News.
We know that the cross sections of those Birkeland currents have regions of
counter-rotation, it's the only thing in the universe that naturally does have counter-rotation.
And of course, the galaxies that form on those filaments
will probably also exhibit that same counter- rotation because that's how they're formed.
Astronomers ought to know these things as well but they don't.
They'd rather talk about things smashing and crashing together and reject the
idea that anything electrical is happening.
Therefore, the only tool they have to explain things is the attractive
force of gravity, so the only thing left for them is to assume collisions or near
collisions are the cause of just about everything they see.
Their Big Bang story says that everything blew apart.
OK, if you accept that, fine, but in addition to blowing apart, then what
causes everything in the universe to spin?
We don't know, no answer.
Every time we hear about or observe counter- rotation of disks or cylinders anywhere,
especially at galaxies that have a common center, think Birkeland currents,
don't think collisions or explosions.
So every time we hear about counter-rotation, just think about Birkeland currents.
It's the only thing in the universe that does have counter-rotation.