So we have f of x is equal to negative x plus 4, and f of x
is graphed right here on our coordinate plane.
Let's try to figure out what the inverse of f is.
And to figure out the inverse, what I like to do is I set y, I
set the variable y, equal to f of x, or we could write that y
is equal to negative x plus 4.
Right now, we've solved for y in terms of x.
To solve for the inverse, we do the opposite.
We solve for x in terms of y.
So let's subtract 4 from both sides.
You get y minus 4 is equal to negative x.
And then to solve for x, we can multiply both sides of this
equation times negative 1.
And so you get negative y plus 4 is equal to x.
Or just because we're always used to writing the dependent
variable on the left-hand side, we could rewrite this as x is
equal to negative y plus 4.
Or another way to write it is we could say that f
inverse of y is equal to negative y plus 4.
So this is the inverse function right here, and we've written
it as a function of y, but we can just rename the y as x
so it's a function of x.
So let's do that.
So if we just rename this y as x, we get f inverse of x is
equal to the negative x plus 4.
These two functions are identical.
Here, we just used y as the independent variable, or
as the input variable.
Here we just use x, but they are identical functions.
Now, just out of interest, let's graph the inverse
function and see how it might relate to this
one right over here.
So if you look at it, it actually looks
fairly identical.
It's a negative x plus 4.
It's the exact same function.
So let's see, if we have-- the y-intercept is 4, it's going
to be the exact same thing.
The function is its own inverse.
So if we were to graph it, we would put it right
on top of this.
And so, there's a couple of ways to think about it.
In the first inverse function video, I talked about how a
function and their inverse-- they are the reflection
over the line y equals x.
So where's the line y equals x here?
Well, line y equals x looks like this.
And negative x plus 4 is actually perpendicular to y is
equal to x, so when you reflect it, you're just kind of
flipping it over, but it's going to be the same line.
It is its own reflection.
Now, let's make sure that that actually makes sense.
When we're dealing with the standard function right
there, if you input a 2, it gets mapped to a 2.
If you input a 4, it gets mapped to 0.
What happens if you go the other way?
If you input a 2, well, 2 gets mapped to 2 either
way, so that makes sense.
For the regular function, 4 gets mapped to 0.
For the inverse function, 0 gets mapped to 4.
So it actually makes complete sense.
Let's think about it another way.
For the regular function-- let me write it explicitly down.
This might be obvious to you, but just in case it's
not, it might be helpful.
Let's pick f of 5.
f of 5 is equal to negative 1.
Or we could say, the function f maps us from 5 to negative 1.
Now, what does f inverse do?
What's f inverse of negative 1?
f inverse of negative 1 is 5.
Or we could say that f maps us from negative 1 to 5.
So once again, if you think about kind of the sets, they're
our domains and our ranges.
So let's say that this is the domain of f, this
is the range of f.
f will take us from to negative 1.
That's what the function f does.
And we see that f inverse takes us back from negative 1 to 5.
f inverse takes us back from negative 1 to 5, just
like it's supposed to do.
Let's do one more of these.
So here I have g of x is equal to negative 2x minus 1.
So just like the last problem, I like to set y equal to this.
So we say y is equal to g of x, which is equal to
negative 2x minus 1.
Now we just solve for x.
y plus 1 is equal to negative 2x.
Just added 1 to both sides.
Now we can divide both sides of this equation by negative 2,
and so you get negative y over 2 minus 1/2 is equal to x, or
we could write x is equal to negative y over 2 minus 1/2, or
we could write f inverse as a function of y is equal to
negative y over 2 minus 1/2, or we can just rename y as x.
And we could say that f inverse of-- oh, let me careful here.
That shouldn't be an f.
The original function was g , so let me be clear.
That is g inverse of y is equal to negative y over 2 minus 1/2
because we started with a g of x, not an f of x.
Make sure we get our notation right.
Or we could just rename the y and say g inverse of x is equal
to negative x over 2 minus 1/2.
Now, let's graph it.
Its y-intercept is negative 1/2.
It's right over there.
And it has a slope of negative 1/2.
Let's see, if we start at negative 1/2, if we move over
to 1 in the positive direction, it will go down half.
If we move over 1 again, it will go down half again.
If we move back-- so it'll go like that.
So the line, I'll try my best to draw it, will
look something like that.
It'll just keep going, so it'll look something like that, and
it'll keep going in both directions.
And now let's see if this really is a reflection over y
equals x. y equals x looks like that, and you can see
they are a reflection.
If you reflect this guy, if you reflect this blue line, it
becomes this orange line.
But the general idea, you literally just-- a function
is originally expressed, is solved for y in terms of x.
You just do some algebra.
Solve for x in terms of y, and that's essentially your inverse
function as a function of y, but then you can rename
it as a function of x.