henry backed in may of twenty twelve since last year
relies on mike i mean i think we must might america made a mistake there by
not reforming the filibuster
donahue looks like they're blocking all present on my mother's legislation and
all the legislation
week progressive democrats pretend to care about all while they blocked all
the bells i didn't see that comic for the republic's me obstinate an
obstructionist
and he literally apologized to uh... time you'd on jeff berkeley
pushing for flobots reform
to get rid of it or at least amended so that the republican wouldn't be able to
block all the progress of belts
anytime
perry said if they're work ever a time when tom udall jeff mark wilber
prophetic it's tonight
these two young five senators said it was time to change the rules are set at
and we did
and they were right
the rest of us were wrong
or most of us anyway
what xin
uh... sierra reed learned his lesson
and uh...
this time around they want to go ahead and and and the filibuster and whether
they be
all right
nothing
harry struck a deal this but i don't think you can filibuster as is with a
tiny little bit of procedural changes that winds up helping harry reid pushes
only gender but not a progressive agenda does that help some little
uh... grease the wheels for a spirit piece of legislation
allows the republicans to use a filibuster ad nauseam
would no substantive changes the block or progressive legislation
of course afterwards so after he they made the deal
perry said no no it's ok the republicans told me
that a good acting good friends and they won't do that
and he said quote it is my hope that these reforms
will help restore a spirit of comedy and bipartisan cooperation
if these reforms do not do enough to end the gridlock your washed in
will consider doing more in the future
byproduct of a media event
yet that the rich at the pacific every single time you didn't do it
and i hope you sit down
it turns out
the republicans
had not restored poverty and
bipartisan cooperation is that i've decided that they're going to block
richard cord rate
uh... to be the permanent head of the consumer financial protection bureau
is now
their visa recess appointment recently a court ruled that those races
appointments uh... might not be constitutional that munich disagree with
that
but it gives the republicans political power to say wean by anyone who would
like
and number one i was
is a guy trial look out for consumers who can have that
win a block him to make sure
but the big banks get their way
while immediately report was starting using the filibuster
for their agenda and said basically not only richard cord right but they are
blocked almost as they literally promise earlier will block any nominee for the
consumer financial pressure miro
because they do not want to protect the consumers
while
aren't sure that harriet shocked and should read
he could miss in this country mark
who's that
dharma
who've been just in the last four years
of worker filibusters an obstruction
no ari said that the main last year and a m told you this of the time
in case the democrats lose the republicans want to come n it to the
senate if they were the majority said the previous democratic leader said we
should add co-author well we're gonna get rid of it
but the democrats when are they going out on western all
is what i had no problems a political death
in case they lost but uh... they didn't lose up golly gee we're still in the
majority that's too bad
okay we promised
we won't get rid of the filibuster will give you that truman disadvantage the
block all these nominees an laws anyway
why
because the democrats are pain to lose
their professional
reserves
the alittle corsair one with their political seats
but when it comes the policy matos matters they throw a big game on purpose
and then go are what can we do while we want to protect consumers and
you know make sure the banks are doing the right thing but all look at that the
republicans filibustered it golly gee i wonder how they did that
they did that because you let him do it then you get it on purpose
this harry is on their side he's not on our side
the great majority the democratic party is on their side
i've said all story on how the new york times one president bombers drone strike
policy
they're not outside