>> THANK YOU ONCE AGAIN FOR
YOUR COVERAGE, ALI.
>> HAVE A GOOD SHOW.
>> THANK YOU.
TODAY, A FEDERAL JUDGE SAID IT
IS LIKELY THAT DONALD TRUMP
COMMITTED CRIMES IN HIS ILLEGAL
ATTEMPTS TO BLOCK THE RECORDING
OF THE ELECTORAL VOTES IN
CONGRESS ON JANUARY 6TH.
JUDGE DAVID CARTER WHO WAS
APPOINTED BY PRESIDENT CLINTON
ORDERED ATTORNEY JOHN EASTMAN
TO TURN OVER HIS EMAILS TO THE
JANUARY 6TH COMMITTEE.
JUDGE CARTER WROTE, IF QUOTE,
EASTMAN AND PRESIDENT TRUMP'S
PLAN HAD WORKED, IT WOULD HAVE
PERMANENTLY ENDED THE PEACEFUL
TRANSITION OF POWER,
UNDERMINING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
AND THE CONSTITUTION.
IF THE COUNTRY DOES NOT COMMIT
TO INVESTIGATING AND PURSUING
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THOSE
RESPONSIBLE.
THE COURT FEARS JANUARY 6TH WILL REPEAT ITSELF.
WILL REPEAT ITSELF.
Aleve it, and see
THAT LINE BEING DIRECTED AT
MERRICK GARLAND, ATTORNEY
GENERAL.
IN A VALUING THE EVIDENCE OF
THE CASE, JUDGE CARTER WROTE,
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, THE
COURT FINDS IT MORE LIKELY THAN
NOT THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP
CORRUPTLY ATTEMPTED TO OBSTRUCT
THE JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS
ON JANUARY 6TH, 2021.
THE ILLEGALITY OF THE PLAN WAS
OBVIOUS.
OUR NATION WAS FOUNDED ON THE
PEACEFUL TRANSITION OF POWER,
EPITOMIZED BY GEORGE WASHINGTON
LAYING DOWN HIS SORT TO MAKE
WAY FOR DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS.
IGNORING THIS HISTORY,
PRESIDENT TRUMP VIGOROUSLY
CAMPAIGNED FOR THE VICE
PRESIDENT TO SINGLE-HANDEDLY
DETERMINE THE RESULT OF THE
2020 ELECTION.
THE JANUARY SIX COMMITTEE IS
CONSIDERING REQUESTING THE
TESTIMONY OF VIRGINIA THOMAS,
THE WIFE OF CLARENCE THOMAS,
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.
THE COMMITTEE IS IN POSSESSION
OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGES
EXCHANGED BETWEEN GINNI THOMAS
AND THE LAST WHITE HOUSE CHIEF
OF STAFF, MARK MEADOWS, IN
WHICH JUDY THOMAS URGED MEADOWS
TO DO ANYTHING POSSIBLE TO
OVERTHROW THE RESULTS OF THE
ELECTION.
INCLUDING, AS SHE SAID IN THIS
TEXT, THERE ARE NO RULES IN
WAR.
THAT MEANS THAT MRS. THOMAS
APPEARS TO BE MORE THAN WILLING
TO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES AND
VIOLATED THE LAW IN THE PURSUIT
OF OVERTURNING THE ELECTION.
IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SUPREME
COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS
COMMITTED A CRIME BY
PARTICIPATING IN A SUPREME
COURT DECISION THAT FORCED ALL
OF MARK MEADOWS COMMUNICATIONS
TO BE TURNED OVER TO THE
JANUARY SIX COMMITTEE.
NOT ONLY DID CLARENCE THOMAS
PARTICIPATE IN THAT DECISION,
WHICH WAS IN AND OF ITSELF A
POSSIBLE CRIME, HE WAS THE ONLY
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE WHO VOTED
TO PREVENT MARK MEADOWS
COMMUNICATIONS FROM BEING
TURNED OVER TO THE COMMITTEE.
IN OTHER WORDS, CLARENCE THOMAS
VOTED TO PREVENT HIS WIFE'S
COMMUNICATIONS TO BE TURNED
OVER TO THE COMMITTEE.
THAT IS, APPARENTLY, A VIVIDLY
CLEAR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW,
WHICH PROHIBITS SUPREME COURT
JUSTICES FROM PARTICIPATING IN
CASES IN WHICH THEIR SPOUSES,
QUOTE, HAVE AN INTEREST THAT
COULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECTED
BY THE OUTCOME OF THE
PROCEEDING.
TODAY, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAID
THIS.
>> IT RAISES A SERIOUS QUESTION
ABOUT CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR
JUSTICE THOMAS.
I MEAN, TO THINK THAT HE WOULD
CONSIDER A CASE WHERE HIS WIFE
IS FREQUENTLY CONTACTING THE
CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE PRESIDENT
AND GIVING ADVICE ON MATTERS
THAT ARE GOING TO BE ALL --
THAT IS THE ULTIMATE CONFLICT
OF INTEREST.
FOR THE GOOD OF THE COURT, I
THINK HE SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF
FROM THESE CASES.
>> JUST OVER AN HOUR AGO, THE
JANUARY SIX COMMITTEE VOTED TO
PROVE REFERRALS OF CRIMINAL
CONTEMPT AGAINST TRUMP CAMPAIGN
OPERATIVE, SCAVINO, AND PETER
NAVARRO.
THEY ARE BOTH ILLEGALLY
REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH
SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY THE
COMMITTEE.
THE MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE OF
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT AGAINST PETER
NAVARRO THAT THE COMMITTEE
PRESENTED TONIGHT WAS VIDEO OF
ARI MELBER'S INTERVIEW WITH
PETER NAVARRO, WHICH
PROSECUTORS WILL NOT BE
STUDYING.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO PLAY A CLIP
RIGHT NOW.
CAN YOU PLEASE Q IT?
>> WHAT ABOUT THIS VIDEO THAT
IS INTERESTING IS I HAVE SO
MUCH KNOWLEDGE TO SHARE WITH
YOU ABOUT WHEN I WAS INVOLVED
AND WHAT I KNOW.
>> GIVEN THAT YOU HAVE TOLD ME
THAT YOU HAVE A PLAN, THAT YOU
PUSH TO DELAY OR DEAL WITH THE
CERTIFICATION, YOU HAVE TOLD ME
100 MEMBERS BACKED IT AND YOU
SAID IN PUBLIC, TRUMP WAS ON
BOARD.
IF YOU SAY ALL THOSE THINGS,
WHY RISK A LEGAL BATTLE OR
GOING TO JAIL TO REFUSE TO
DISCUSS WITH THE COMMITTEE
UNDER OATH?
>> BECAUSE I HAVE A LOYALTY TO
THE CONSTITUTION AND A LOYALTY
TO THE PRESIDENT.
THE PRESIDENT HAS INVOKED
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE IN THIS
MATTER.
IT IS NOT MY AUTHORITY TO
REVOKED THAT PRIVILEGE.
>> YOU SAY IT'S NOT YOUR
PRIVILEGE TO WAIVE --
LOOK AT HOW OFTEN YOU HAVE
WAVED IT.
LOOK AT SOME OF THE NEWS YOU
HAVE MADE ON THESE TOPICS.
>> FORMER TRUMP ADVISOR PETER
NAVARRO IS SPILLING THE BEANS
--
>> WE HAVE OVER 100 CONGRESSMEN
AND SENATORS ON CAPITOL HILL,
READY TO IMPLEMENT THIS WEEK.
>> PETER NAVARRO.
>> THE BOSS TELLS PENCE TO TAKE
MY CALL.
>> NAVARRO TELLS ROLLING STONE,
IT WAS ABOUT SENDING THE VOTES
BACK.
>> MOST OR ALL OF THE STATES
WOULD DECERTIFY THE ELECTION.
>> HOW DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO
TAKE SERIOUSLY YORK LANE THAT
THIS IS SECRET AND PRIVILEGED,
WHEN YOU'VE BEEN OUT THERE
TALKING ABOUT IT AND WHEN YOU
AND BANNON SAID THE COMMITTEE'S