Director and actress Olivia Wilde recently revealed in her upcoming film,
Don't Worry Darling, that she based a character off of Jordan Peterson.
Now, of course Peterson was not flattered by the remarks before we get to his
meltdown over it.
We'll tell you what Olivia Wilde had to say about it, first some info
411 about this film which just premiered at the Venice Film Festival and
apparently has this background of a lot of drama.
Alice and Jack are lucky to be living in the idealized community of Victory,
the experimental company town housing the men who work for
the top secret Victory project and their families or for them.
Okay, so the 1950's societal optimism espoused by their CEO Frank,
equal parts corporate visionary and motivational life coach,
anchors every aspect of daily life in the tight knit desert Utopia.
When cracks in Alice's idyllic life begin to appear exposing flashes of
something much more sinister lurking beneath the attractive facade.
Alice can't help questioning exactly what they're doing in Victory and why?
So that's the premise of the film, okay?
Now, Chris Pine plays the role of Frank who was inspired by Jordan Peterson.
Now, how do we know that?
Well, in an interview with Maggie Gyllenhaal, Olivia Wilde made that known.
So Wild said we based Chris Pine's character on this insane man,
Jordan Peterson,
who is this pseudo-intellectual hero to the incel community, you know the incels?
Gyllenhaal responds, no.
Wild says they're basically disenfranchised,
mostly white men who believe they are entitled to sex from women.
Gyllenhaal responds, right.
>> [LAUGH] But this is what we have to deal with.
Every day we have to come in here, tell you a story of right wing lunatics and
then debate the lunatics.
And like, so I love Gyllenhaal's reaction,
they're like, men who think they're entitled to date women.
>> No, not to date women entitled to get sex from women.
>> Yes, and to mate with women, basically, and she's like right,
well, of course that would exist.
And of course we would have to debate them.
No, you do not have a right to mate with women that otherwise known as rape by
the way.
But anyway, okay, you don't have that right.
As pseudo intellectual, that tells you that that is the right thing.
That, as a matter of nature is not an intelligent person, but
nope we gotta debate it.
I guarantee you anybody there's the right wingers Washington,
[LAUGH] you're right, Jordan Peterson is the smartest man I know.
Yeah, maybe you know.
>> How exactly are these men supposed to be laid when conservatives believe that
women should be chased, right?
Okay, anyway, let me continue.
So after Maggie Gyllenhaal says, right, Wild response with and
they believe, meaning the incels.
And they believe that society has now robbed them that the idea of feminism
is working against nature and that we must be put back into the correct place.
Gyllenhaal responds with.
Well, they must be psyched things are going really well for them and why.
>> [LAUGH] I lover dry humor.
>> I know, Wilde response.
Yeah, they're actually succeeding in many different ways.
But this guy Jordan Peterson is someone that legitimizes certain aspects of their
movement because he's a former professor.
He's an author, he wears a suit so
they feel like this is a real philosophy that should be taken seriously.
Okay, so Jordan Peterson didn't take kindly to that description of who he
is even though it's accurate and we'll get to his reaction to it in just a moment.
But I wanna give Cenk an opportunity to jump in.
>> Yeah, no, I love how much Olivia Wilde knows about this situation.
She's more political apparently or paying attention to politics or
than other folks are.
It's a perfect person to caricature, right?
And but the last part of what she said is the most true.
People just want an excuse to do what they wanna do.
And all they need is, you know how Fox News uses minorities and
women to argue against minorities and women, right?
Or they'll use Dave Rubin, argue against people in LGBTQ community etc.
This old trick, right?
So but they also need people in suits saying fancy words not
making any sense, but saying what they want to hear, right?
>> Because it gives it gives this illusion of legitimacy.
So like on one hand you've got clowns like Andrew Tate and
it's like who's gonna take Andrew Tate?
Like look they're definitely misogynistic dudes and incels who love Andrew Tate.
But he doesn't give that illusion of legitimacy that I think for
a very long time Jordan Peterson was able to do.
But I think that that whole facade is cracking because he can't stop
crying literally.
>> Yeah, and that's a separate issue but he also makes no sense at all.
And so whether it's him saying, yeah women should be forced to do okay,
but he says it in a suit and he says it with SAT words, they go yes.
Curtis When I interviewed him he's saying that we need a CEO president or
a monarch, president or a dictator president.
Now, that makes no sense.
I asked them, well then what if the dictator turns on you and kills you?
He said well that would be unfortunate.
Okay, but Peter Thiel, Blake Masters, JD Vance, wanna be able to be a dictator.
So that they go Curtis Darwin, intellectual,
same thing with Alexander Dugan and Russia, the guy's a maniac.
He says we should go back in the medieval ages and
we should kill anyone who disagrees.
They're like, Russian philosopher Dugan, Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson,
all these morons refer to him as if he's a smart guy.
He's saying murder your political opponents,
what part of that is intellectual, right?
They just need a guy in a suit.
That's all they need.
>> All right, so now we go to Jordan Peterson's reaction.
He didn't like it and he uses the same jargon to again,
give you this illusion of intellectualism.
He says now Pine meaning Chris Pine has a reputation as quite an attractive man.
He does, I concur, so that could be worse.
I also hope that Chris Pine at least does the sartorial splendor of my very formal
public wardrobe justice as he pillories me in the latest bit of propaganda,
disseminated by the woke, self righteous bores and bullies,
who now dominate Hollywood and who insist on the production of such tripe.
See like normal people who happen to be intelligent, don't talk like that.
>> Right.
>> You get what I'm saying?
>> 100%.
It reads like an SATSA.
[LAUGH] He's trying so hard.
That's what's funny about it.
So sartorial, pillory, stripe, right?
And did the right wing instead of you have no idea what he's saying.
Okay, all they heard from there was woke.
>> Big words.
>> Yeah, I'm against woke and what he said about the sarcastic tutorial thing.
Okay, yeah, against the woke, chick should be made to date me.
>> Listen to all the men out there.
All the young men out there,
who are frustrated because they're not getting laid.
I want to help you get laid.
I do, I really do, no but I do, right?
Everyone needs a little love.
Okay, everyone needs a release.
So I feel you, but you're being led astray.
Jordan Peterson will not get you laid, look at him, listen to him talk and
understand that he is the epitome of a lady boner killer.
Like just don't do it.
Why are you needlessly digging yourself into a celibacy hole?
You don't need it.
Okay, do better find a better role model, find a better hero.
He's actually working against you.
Let me give you more from Jordan Peterson.
Many of the young men whom the progressive and cancel culture facilitating
mad woke mob, which contains no shortage of bitter self-righteous,
victimhood-brandishing, virtue-signaling, accusatory and
even outright demented mean-girl feminists, have shamed and
tortured into cowering forever daring to manifest a single masculine attributes,
have turned to my work and found some solace there in.
>> Okay, I there's two parts of that, one is the word salad.
Just throw up boards against the wall.
See your audience isn't gonna understand it anyway.
Second of all I love that he thinks that he is the epitome of masculine.
>> I know.
>> And they're finding solace like he's like finally a real man.
Like [LAUGH] l.
>> No totally like when when I hear Kermit talk I think turns me on.
Okay, let me just give you the last quote.
Okay, Peterson adds that he has repeatedly and very publicly told young men and
women, that they should think very hard about their own personal shortcomings and
not the evil of the opposite sex.
And that they should in consequence strive to amend themselves
in the very ways that would make them attractive.
And look honestly, that's pretty rich coming from a man who literally and
sincerely argued for arranged marriages.
Arranged marriages usually mean that,
at least one party doesn't get a choice in the matter.
Okay, so the idea of like no be your best self and that's how you attract a mate.
That's not really what he believes in.
He thinks that women should submit to whatever desires men want in this country.
Violent attacks, by the way, this is a little insight into Jordan Peterson here.
Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr Peterson says.
And society needs to work to make sure those men are married,
enforced monogamy is to Peterson simply a rational solution, enforced monogamy.
Otherwise women will all only go for the most high status men,
he explains, and that couldn't make either gender happy in the end.
No, agree to disagree.
Like, [LAUGH], no, we should have a government mandate monogamy.
That's how everyone will be happy.
We'll be happy if the government mandates monogamy,
like what is wrong with this guy?
>> No, look, guys, I can't begin to tell you how non-intellectual he is.
He says things as if they're facts,
he says don't get focused on the over focused on the evils of the opposite sex.
What evils, why did you assume that men have evil or
women have evil and what kind of evil it is?
Evil as a concept is anti-intellectual to begin with.
But anyways, but even if you get beyond that, he just says it as if like well
obviously these different sexes are evil and now I'm gonna tell you how to fix it.
I don't need to fix it because they're not evil.
You're just making weirdo assumptions.
They and what do the men, the right wing men in the audience here?
Women are evil.
You think they're gonna think, yeah, we're evil.
No, they're gonna think women are evil and
he just gave them permission to think that.
But it does, none of this matters.
I can break down every argument into 100 different
parts that make no logical sense but enforced monogamy.
We're still having a conversation about this idiot, enforced monogamy.
By the way from right wingers who believe in small government, but
they're gonna come into your personal life.
I am enforcing monogamy upon you.
Are you guys lunatics, answer yes.