I've got two this is the Taurus PT 92 beretta 92 copy manufactured on Beretta
tooling in Brazil this one my beretta 92 G both of them well they're pretty much
the same gun this one is decocker only this one is
decocker with this safety but I really like them I really like them both I
should kind of get rid of one huh maybe we compare the Taurus 92 the Beretta
92 this time on Gun Physics stainless steel slide and Barrel and a whole bunch
added really shiny good-looking parts and a anodized aluminum frame for this
Taurus PT 92 is the earlier version without the rail but I bought it because
it's shiny and a whole lot more recently for about the same price I picked up
this beretta 92 the beretta is pretty well used kind of different from the
Taurus those Hogue wraparound grips on it right now are new the originals were
pretty beat up it looks a whole lot better actually than it did before
I don't know if you're into antiques but it's got a kind of cool patina on it
they are of course kind of just about the same gun but they have totally
different uses really accurate with these things really like the triggers
double action not so much but the triggers are nice and you can tell that
this one's been used quite a bit with the barrel on that black beretta beretta
sights of tritium inserts too Taurus has been independently making that PT 92 for
decades magazines are almost compatible the one with the big slot is the Taurus
small slot is the beretta Taurus went to the frame mounted safety decocker
ambidextrous easier to operate but feels a bit flimsier than the beretta 92 and
it's slide mounted decocker only this is the 92 G with that decocker only it
is ambidextrous other versions do have a decocker safety all slide mounted the
rear sight it's black and the hammer it's seriously ugly and black those are the
two things I'd like to change along with some getting some crazy grips to make
this thing look just beautiful this one I might change the hammer spring to a
double action spring to make it a bit easier to pull that trigger but other
than that it's pretty good neither of them has any kind of bevel in the
magazine well the PT 92 does not have a lanyard loop I think those things are
cool maybe I'll put one of those in and here's a side by side comparison the
rear of the slide the hammer and the rear sights the big difference is the
trigger for me is PT 92 trigger no creep at all in the single action it's the
best trigger I have oh so nice pull it to clear some safeties BAM drops the
hammer beautiful I love it the Beretta 92 G this one you can change
parts of course but it's got some spongy creepy stuff see that movement safeties
creeps a little bit and then drops it's not a bad trigger I work it really well
but it is not as nice as a PT 92 but totally prefer the trigger on the
shiny silver one here's the double action on the Beretta it's long it's
kind of stagey it's not too bad and the trigger is not as curved on the
Taurus more comfortable to pull the trigger this one it's actually
smoother smoother just rolls right through and then the hammer falls but
triggers curvier and it twists my finger a bit more on the Taurus I want to
change that hammer but if I change the hammer it's probably going to change the
action of the trigger unless I get some professional he knows what he's doing so
I've got two of the same gun what do I do I keep them both and modify both of
them for completely different purposes they'll get rid of one of them I'm just
some regular guy or need to the same gun
haha I should keep them both just for that hey thanks for watching Gun Physics
your thumbs up really helps a lot in the ratings so thanks for that - and I've
got new videos coming out most Tuesdays subscribe for more