So I was doing some work in our collegiate dictionary, and I was doing some reading in
the letter B, and I ran across the entry for “bitch”.
And I noticed that the entry for bitch had many meanings but didn’t actually have any
labels on it that said those meanings were offensive or vulgar or derogatory, which really
surprised me.
So I went through this deep dig through our archives to see why that is.
And the word “bitch” was originally used of a female dog, and that goes back all the
way into Old English over a thousand years, but by about 1400 it had also come to refer
to a lewd woman or an immoral woman.
And then shortly thereafter it was also used to refer to a domineering woman or a woman
who was like a man.
And you see this really interesting proliferation of meaning for the word bitch in the 1500s,
1600s, and 1700s where “bitch” when applied to a woman is always pretty much negative,
and “bitch” is also applied to men at this point.
And it’s applied to men in a way that feminizes them.
So gay men were called “bitch” back in the 1600s.
And weak and ineffectual men were called “bitch”.
So it’s really fascinating as you see this movement through history, and historical dictionaries
did say “bitch” was the worst thing that you could possibly call a woman.
They ignored all of the uses of men, which is also a really fascinating thing.
No one entered those uses for hundreds and hundreds of years in their dictionaries even
though they were very common.
So what happened is I really wanted to know why this didn’t have a label on it.
So I went through and looked back at our defining history, because we have all that history
in the office.
And I found that really from about the 1930s onward, there were different editors who argued
that we include any sense that refer to men because that was important; that was historical
use.
And those notes were often rejected, so nothing appeared for a while.
And then in the 60s the person who was in charge of editing the entry for bitch was
a woman, and she had included in her notes some strong labels saying that this was an
abusive term, and those got dropped.
They were dropped for no apparent reason.
So then we come up into the '90s which is when the last big revision to the word bitch
was made for our collegiate dictionary, and it gets a usage note that says it’s used
as “a generalized term of abuse”.
So okay, now we have a usage note there.
It’s not the same as saying it’s offensive or vulgar, but we’re heading in the right
direction.
And the two times in the modern company history where that was done, it was done at the instance
of a woman, someone who had actually lived what it’s like to be called a bitch constantly.
So what’s really fascinating is you see this arc of meaning that is very clearly derogatory.
And lexicographers just didn’t, I mean in general didn’t, pick it up for a while.
If they entered the word at all they didn’t actually define it.
They just said it was a terrible word to call a woman.
Or once they started defining it there were enough issues around—there were enough instances
of “bitch” used as a reclaimed slur: Women saying, you know, “Well I’m a tough bitch,”
which reads like a positive thing.
So it’s this very interesting interplay of: here’s a negative word and everyone
sort of knows in their gut that it’s a negative word.
You don’t call a woman a bitch.
But women are calling themselves bitches, and it’s meant as a compliment to themselves.
So how do lexicographers deal with that, with this idea that slurs get reclaimed?
But how do you describe it?
And every person has a different reaction to the word bitch and that depends on the
context it’s used in, who uses it, what kind of mood they’re in when they hear it,
whether it’s directed at them or not, whether they’re using it of someone else.
So it’s a really difficult thing as a lexicographer to come up with just a one line definition
that covers all of those varied uses.