Quick question: Have you noticed that Bill Gates always evades certain questions about
vaccines?
Gates has spoken quite a few times about vaccines in this pandemic and one of the things that
have stirred public opinion is the so called microchips, or whatever.
But let's see what happens with his body language when he addresses these conspiracies about
him:
My name is Jesús Enrique Rosas, I am the Body Language guy, and I want to help you
discover what is beyond words.
In this video you will learn:
- How to spot 3 facial expressions that reveal true emotions,
- How to tell when someone evades a question, and
- One powerful tip that you can use to press for an answer
Bill Gates was interviewed by Norah O'Donnell addressing the conspiracy theories about the
vaccines having microchips to track people.
For this analysis, I used proprietary AI software to analyze Gates facial expressions and voice
tone.
But before we begin, I'm sure you can help me supporting my channel.
All you have to do is like this video, hit the subscribe button and share it with anyone
you know that wants to learn body language secrets.
One of the most striking features of this video is the way Gates has always a slight
smile on his face.
And as in every body language analysis, it's important to set a baseline or what is the
usual facial expression of someone.
- An epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing
to cause a ten million excess deaths.
As you can see in this video from 2017, he is talking about the same subject, pandemics,
but he remains serious when talking about it.
By the way, it's interesting that he raises his left shoulder twice, reinforcing the notion
that he has an emotional reaction about the subject.
- There was a simulation called Dark Winter that didn’t go very well…
Smallpox scored 1 and humanity scored 0…
Also, why does he smile when he talks about this pandemic simulation where Smallpox scored
one and humanity scored zero?
You start to notice that the shrug is something he does when he is excited about a subject,
combined with the fact that he smiles every now and then when talking about epidemics.
Now, so far we cannot tell if he is happy about epidemics happening or about discussing
the topic of epidemics.
It's a very important distinction and, for example, that's why people find criminal movies
and series so popular.
It's because the topic is fascinating, not because they want to become one.
Well...
I guess
But, how can we tell if someone is not happy about the topic of epidemics, but epidemics
becoming a reality?
We compare these body language signals to his answers to the questions about the microchip
conspiracy.
- Why wasn’t there a federal testing plan… why aren’t we getting the tests out to low
income… some of which because we didn’t understand the virus very well…
All along the video you notice that Gates lacks nonverbal vocabulary because he usually
does the same hand gestures no matter what he's saying.
He displays a very controlled personality because his right hand gestures are much more
open and higher than his left hand gestures.
The left hand is usually more emotional than the right hand.
- …didn’t have the leadership message there.
So, yes, we have a lot of regrets…
when he talks about the US not having the leadership message for mask compliance, he
lowers his gaze.
Even as he is pointing responsibility on the US government, he is not totally confident
about it.
- …their leadership, communicated with a clear voice…
It's totally different when he talks about Europe's leadership: notice the way he says
the word.
- Should reduce the death rate and, you know, eventually, by the end of next year get us
out of this terrible situation.
Again, he raises his right hand when saying 'reduce death rate', and it looks really suspicious
but it's just a lack of nonverbal vocabulary.
But that's the problem when you don't say with your body the same things you say with
your words.
Inmediately after, he laughs a bit.
Those are the things we don't get about Gates, that in many occassions his emotional expressions
are off.
It's similar of my analisis of Prince Andrew's interview, that you can check out here.
When O'Donnell mentions the "mortality rate, infections skyrocketing, hospitalizations",
he does a sturgeon face that usually means that you acknowledge something.
But as he holds the expression, we see what seems a suppressed smile, again.
Those emotional contradictions cast a lot of doubt about his motives or what is he thinking
at that point.
Like when he hears the sentence "Where is that discussion coming from", regarding the
reopening of schools, he smiles broadly.
There's no reason to do that at that time.
It makes for a good case of not projecting emotions in a way that you'd expect,
and that must be why so many people believe that Bill Gates has Aspergers', but there
is nothing official about that.
That's one of the reasons why, when you analyze people like Greta Thumberg, supposedly diagnosed
with Aspergers', you need to use a different set of behavioral clues, other than facial
expressions.
And that's why I always stress that any body language analysis must include verbal expression,
voice tone and body movements.
But luckily, now we can get a little help from technology to make an statistical analysis
of any persons' facial expressions, the emotions they project with their faces and wether or
not it is Congruent with what they are saying.
We need a couple steps first, namely removing the glasses, extracting a 3D model of the
subject's face and make sure the software can track expression points in a virtualized
three dimensional space.
So that's how we can analyze a whole range of expressions and how they distribute along
the timeline, in this case the whole interview.
This technology can also be used for your business, so if you want to find out more,
there's a link in the description.
For Gates, you spot certain stress points like the very interesting question: Are these
vaccines safe?
- Are these vaccines safe?
The question is critical and even O'Donnel hesitates for a split second while asking.
- Well, the… uhh… the FDA… not being pressured… will look hard at that.
The FDA is the gold standard of regulators…
And that's where Gates shows a rapid succession not only of facial emotions but stress gestures
when touching his face.
If you saw the whole interview you'll notice that he almost never touches his face, and
here he does it a couple times.
Now, how many times do you think he's been asked that question?
I'm sure that quite a few.
So it's normal that he could have been waiting for it.
But even so, he reacts in a very emotional way.
You can tell how much the topic affects him when he needs to stand for something he knows
he has no control over.
He has a very hard time answering the question.
- The side effects were not super severe… that is, they didn’t cause… permanent
health problems for, uhh…
And he just adds that the symptoms "are not super severe", and "It didn't cause permanent
problems", but he lowers his voice when saying the word "problems".
He's not sure.
- So, who’s gonna get the vaccine first?
To the question: "Who's gonna get the vaccine first?" he pauses for a moment and closes
his eyes for almost a second.
He doesn't like to hear that question, no matter how many times it's asked.
If they are currently talking about seven billion vaccines that need at least two doses,
we're facing a humongous project that is gonna take several months just to produce and administer
the doses globally.
But we don't know the reasons behind that emotional reaction.
Whe don't know if he is worried about the long time it's going to take, or if it would
be fair that some countries get the vaccines before others.
I'd love to read your opinion in the comments.
- To be clear, do you want a vaccine so you can implant microchips into people?
- No, there's no connection between any of these vaccines and any tracking type thing
at all.
I don't know where that came from.
The moment of truth when O'Donnell asks about the conspiracy that links the vaccine a tracking
system.
In this case he answers calm and collected.
He was expecting the question and he answers accordingly.
But then, O'Donnell applies a version of the Columbo questioning technique and asks again:
Why do you think so many people believe this conspiracy to be true?
How did it become so popular?
Gates' answer is clear: "I don't know",
- I don't know
but the inflection of the answer is like a question:
- I don't know
He shows insecurity and proceeds to talk about the efforts of Doctor Fauchi and himself and
their values.
He tries to justify his actions, but the truth is that he knows exactly why the conspiracy
started in the first place.
And for that we should go to Reuter's page where the conspiracy is debunked.
Apparently, it's more about a digital certificate that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
were developing.
And here comes the strange part: There's a paragraph that says:
"IBM describes a digital certificate as an “electronic document” used to identify
an individual, and associate the identity with a public key.
Like a driver’s license or a passport, it provides proof of a person’s identity."
But that link to IBM does not exist.
And if you try to search it inside Archive.Org, all snapshots are down.
That's really, really odd.
In that same page we get a link to Rice University's web page, an article from December 2019, where
it describes a technology to administer a vaccine and leave an invisible digital tattoo
with the vaccine's information.
Kevin McHugh, the scientist behind the breakthrough addresses that he was actually contacted by
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
"They came to us and said... we have a real problem, knowing who's Vaccinated...
So our idea was to put the Record in the person"
I must say, this blew my mind.
imagine that you don't need any paper records.
You just scan the person and know which vaccines they got.
That way you make sure noone gets double vaccinated.
That is truly amazing.
But, don't you think it would be better to say they were looking for a solution to this
problem and that's where the conspiracy took off?
Makes you wonder why they don't mention any of this technology anymore.
Must be because besides being an amazing breakthrough, it also poses serious ethical issues.
Because let's suppose that digital tattoo has no personal records; only has information
about the vaccine.
Well, there are lots of vaccines that have two or three doses so it's imperative that
the information includes dates.
And for a massive vaccination process there is not gonna be a single company manufacturing
them.
So you will also have the company name on it.
And just to be sure there should be a serial number that tracks the shot all the way to
the facility it was created in case something goes wrong with a certain batch of vaccines.
Remember, we're talking about a system that doesn't need any paper or digital records.
So wether you want it or not, you would be adding some sort of serial number to the person.
No, it's not a microchip, but if the pattern could be read with a customized smartphone,
then you could track that unique serial number with infrared scanners.
He can't say he doesn't know where the conspiracy came from.
He just doesn't want to explain all this.
And the powerful tip you can use to press for an answer is:
After your question, add the words: "It's a simple question"
An example: "What happened to the digital tattoo research of Rice University?"
"It's a simple question"
When you say "It's a simple question", you are forcing them to give a simple answer.
And if they don't have a simple answer, it will show.
Did you spot any other clues in the interview video?
don't forget to share them in the comments.
And to make sure you don't miss any of my body language analysis, like this video and
hit that subscribe button.