In his anti-Semitic book “On the Jewish Question”, Karl Marx said -
“What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money… Money is
the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”
He also says -
“Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers
of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again to be Jews is perhaps no more
than a historic coincidence.”
“We discern in Judaism… a universal antisocial element of the present time.”
“As soon as society succeeds in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism - huckstering
and its conditions - the Jew becomes impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an
object… The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”
Karl Marx also hated on individual Jews personally, such as his words against Joseph Moses Levy
- the publisher of the Daily Telegraph.
“The Weekly Mail maintains that although Levy really fools no one, he has changed "i"
into "y", and it is true that among the 22,000 Levites whom Moses counted in the journey
through the wilderness, there was not a single Levi who spelled his name with a "y". Just
as Edouard Simon spares no effort to be regarded as belonging to the Romance people, so Levy
is determined to be an Anglo-Saxon. Therefore, at least once a month he attacks the un-English
policies of Mr. Disraeli, for Disraeli, "the Asiatic mystery", is, unlike the Telegraph,
not an Anglo-Saxon by descent. But what does it profit Levy to attack Mr. D'Israeli and
to change "i" into "y", when Mother Nature has inscribed his origins in the clearest
possible way right in the middle of his face. The nose of the mysterious stranger of Slawkenbergius
(see Tristram Shandy) who had got the finest nose from the promontory of noses was just
a nine days' wonder in Strasbourg, whereas Levy's nose provides conversation throughout
the year in the City of London.”
And Engels praised this book and this passage, as does Marxists.org, describing it as one
of the most brilliant of Marx’s writings. In one letter to Engels, Marx also called
someone a “Jewish n*****”.
And, in his last book, Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx says:
“The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly
they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what
is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”
There are even more anti-semitic statements by Karl Marx besides those shown here. But
I’m going to go back to the first quote, because I think this one is the key to understanding
why Karl Marx hated the Jews.
“What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money… Money is
the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”
In order to understand this passage in full, context is needed. We first need to understand
what Karl Marx means when he says “money”.
In Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx makes it clear over and over that he thinks money is
a commodity. The shortest quote I have of this is -
“That money is a commodity is therefore a new discovery...”
He goes on to say that, when money is used to buy and sell commodities, it becomes capital.
And it is the person who’s sole motive is the accumulation of more and more money (capital,
or profit) that makes someone a capitalist.
So, in this passage, Karl Marx is saying that money is Capital, and that Capitalism is Jewish.
To Karl Marx, the Jews are the Capitalists. Money, in Karl Marx’s eyes, is the Jewish
God. And Karl Marx thinks that their sole motive is the accumulation of more money,
which Karl Marx says is what a Capitalist does. So, money (which is Capital, in Karl
Marx’s eyes) is Judaism. In other words, Capitalism is Judaism. And Judaism is Capitalism.
That’s why when Karl Marx refers to the Capitalists, he’s actually referring to
the Jews.
We can see this in several other passages, including this one again, which at first glance,
doesn’t really make any sense.
“The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly
they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what
is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”
Think about it: why would commodities be “inwardly circumcised Jews”? It doesn’t make any
sense on its own. But now that we know that Karl Marx thinks Capitalists are Jews, and
that capitalists produce commodities, we can piece this together to discover the true message
of what Karl Marx is saying here.
As he’s already admitted, when he says “capitalist”, he means “Jews”. And when he says “commodities”,
he means the “products” of the Jews. Or, the “offspring” of the Jews. So if we
replace the words with their actual meaning, this quote actually reads: “The Jews know
that their offspring… are inwardly circumcised Jews…” And now this passage makes sense.
In this next quote, Karl Marx uses the word “Pharisee”, which means a member of an
ancient Jewish sect.
“The Pharisee of a capitalist represented by one of his servants, accompanies this action,
of course, with the unctuous phrase: “That’s for mother,” yet he knows well enough that
the poor children must sit up and help.”
Karl Marx is saying here that the “Pharisee of a capitalist” - in other words, the “Jewishness
of a capitalist” - is on show when he gives work to one of his servants. And this is confirmation
that Marx believes that the Jews are the Capitalists, and that the Capitalists are the Jews. He
then drives this point home here -
“In striking contrast with the great fact, that the shortening of the hours of labour
of women and children in English factories was exacted from capital by the male operatives,
we find in the latest reports of the Children’s Employment Commission traits of the operative
parents in relation to the traffic in children, that are truly revolting and thoroughly like
slave-dealing. But the Pharisee [or Jewishness] of a capitalist, as may be seen from the same
reports, denounces this brutality which he himself creates, perpetuates, and exploits,
and which he moreover baptises “freedom of labour.” “Infant labour has been called
into aid ... even to work for their own daily bread. Without strength to endure such disproportionate
toil, without instruction to guide their future life, they have been thrown into a situation
physically and morally polluted. The Jewish historian has remarked upon the overthrow
of Jerusalem by Titus that it was no wonder it should have been destroyed, with such a
signal destruction, when an inhuman mother sacrificed her own offspring to satisfy the
cravings of absolute hunger.”
So again, we have confirmation here that Karl Marx thinks that the Capitalists are the Jews.
And the whole of Das Kapital is anti-Semitic through and through. Here’s another quote -
“It is not because he is a leader of industry that a man is a capitalist; on the contrary,
he is a leader of industry because he is a capitalist. The leadership of industry is
an attribute of capital, just as in feudal times the functions of general and judge,
were attributes of landed property.”
At first glance, this doesn’t make sense. Why would a capitalist be a leader of an industry
simply by declaring himself to be a capitalist? That doesn’t make sense. If I declare myself
a Capitalist, that doesn’t make me a leader of industry. So clearly, that’s not what
Karl Marx is saying.
What Karl Marx has said in the previous quotes is that, Capitalists are Jews. And, if we
apply that belief that Karl Marx has to this quote, the message becomes clear. Karl Marx
is saying here that, because the Capitalist is Jewish, he is therefore a leader of industry.
This is implying that the Jewish-Capitalists didn’t become leaders of industry by merit
or anything else, but were appointed because of their Jewish faith, which is money (or capital).
And there are other clues that this is the correct way to interpret Karl Marx’s anti-Capitalism
and anti-Semitism (which are the same thing). In another passage in Das Kapital, Karl Marx
writes -
“That Philistine paper, the Spectator, states that after the introduction of a sort of partnership
between capitalist and workmen in the “Wirework Company of Manchester,” “the first result
was a sudden decrease in waste, the men not seeing why they should waste their own property
any more than any other master’s, and waste is, perhaps, next to bad debts, the greatest
source of manufacturing loss.” The same paper finds that the main defect in the Rochdale
co-operative experiments is this: “They showed that associations of workmen could
manage shops, mills, and almost all forms of industry with success, and they immediately
improved the condition of the men; but then they did not leave a clear place for masters.”
Quelle horreur!”
So, why would Marx feel the need to state that the Spectator is “Philistine”? What
relevance does this have? Well, it turns out that, the historical Philistines were anti-Jewish
and fought against the Jews. Karl Marx himself used the word “Philistine” to mean ethnically
“anti-Jewish” rather than spiritually anti-Jewish. So, Marx is pointing out that
the ethnically anti-Semitic newspaper (the Spectator) is praising the fact that the Socialist
experiments in Rochdale had left out the Jewish masters. Its hatred against the Jews, and
its praise of Socialism, gets rid of the Judeo-bourgeoisie class. And Karl Marx is on board with that,
which is why he sarcastically says that the “main defect” (meaning, it wasn’t really
a defect) was that it got rid of the Jews, and then says “source of horror!” at the
end. As in, “shock, horror, really!?” - meaning, of course Socialism got rid of
the Jews!
So I think it should be quite clear to you all by now that Karl Marx uses the word “capitalist”
to hide the word “Jew”, as a way to hide his anti-Semitism in plain sight. His greatest
book, Das Kapital (the Capital), means the “money-commodity” in Karl Marx’s own
words. Karl Marx says “money” is the “jealous god of Israel” - that money is the Jewish
religion. And so “Das Kapital” literally means “The Jewish religion” or just simply
“The Jew”. “Das Kapital” is “The Jew”! The entire thing is an anti-Semitic
hit-piece, disguised with euphemisms and doublespeak to hide its true meaning. The true ‘believers’
(the anti-Semites, the Marxists) of course, know what their ‘real’ Socialism is. At
its core, it’s anti-Semitism!
The fundamental belief of anti-Capitalism is that the Capitalists are stealing wealth
off the workers. This is untrue (because Value is Subjective, not based on Labour). But to
a racist, it is true, because a racist (who isn’t a “money-changer”, and therefore
has little idea about money) believes that the “workers” (people who are not Jews)
put the value of their Labour into the products that they produce. And they believe that the
Jews don’t work and just make money from the money they already have (they’re the
“money-changers”). So the racist believes that the Jewish “money-changers” are stealing
off of everyone else in society. This is factually untrue, but hopefully you can see now how
this fundamental belief is at the core of Socialist ideology. Anti-Capitalism comes
from anti-Semitism - the two concepts are entwined, and are one and the same.
And, when Karl Marx says the word “bourgeoisie”, he actually means two things. First, he means
“the Jews”, which includes ethnic Jews, but he also means the Capitalists (non-ethnic
Jews, whom he says are practicing the “Jewish faith” of Capitalism). Proof for this will
be shown shortly. But I need to explain the historic context first.
In the Dark Ages, the Christian Pope banned “usury”, which is the lending of money
and charging interest for that money. So, Christians couldn’t lend money. Only non-Christians
could, which is why, in the west, only the Jews could be bankers and money-lenders (hence
why Karl Marx calls them the “money-changers”). But at the same time, the Jews were not allowed
to own land (it was Christian Europe) and were forced to live in towns and cities. In
English, towns and cities were called “boroughs”, which is where we get the word “Bourgeoisie”
from, which is the French for “Townsfolk”. So, historically, due to old-fashioned anti-Semitism,
the Jews were a major element of the bourgeoisie. This is why racists like Karl Marx believed
that the Jews were the bourgeoisie, and that Capitalism was Jewish - it’s old fashioned
anti-Semitism which dated back to the medieval period.
And I know that some Marxists will claim that it is anti-Semitic to point out that historic-racism
led to the Jews being the bourgeoisie. No, denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism forced
the Jews to become the bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. It was because the Jewish people were forced
to live in towns and practice usury as a result of anti-Semitism, that gave Edward the 1st
of England the excuse to murder half the male Jews in England in 1279.
“Every single Jewish adult male in England was seized and imprisoned - at least 600 individuals
out of a total community of only 2,000 to 4,000 people. They, it seems, were the special
target of the sting operation. Of course, the Jews had a long-standing dominance of
the money and metalworking trades, so to some extent an investigation into coin-clipping
was bound to focus on their activities.”
“But Edward’s readiness to believe that all Jews were involved in devaluing his currency,
and the disproportionate conviction rate of Jews and Christians, tell us that there was
a darker dimension to the story.”
“Early in the new year of 1279, when the trials of the accused began, some twenty-nine
Christians were hanged for their crimes, but around ten times as many Jews suffered the
same fate. In his drive to improve his finances... Edward executed half of the adult males in
a minority population. Almost incidentally, he had committed the single biggest massacre
of Jews in British history.”
So, just to clarify this to the anti-Semitic Marxists - denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism
forced the Jews to become money-lenders and forced them to move into towns to become the
bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. Denying that that was what happened is anti-Semitic, and
is a denial of historic anti-Semitism.
But anyway, because of historic anti-Semitism, Karl Marx had good reason to believe that
a significant portion of the bourgeoisie were the Jews. We can see this here -
“The essential conditions for the existence and for the sway of the bourgeois class is
the formation and augmentation of capital...”
If “Capital” is “money”, and “money is the jealous god of Israel”, which Karl
Marx has said, then the bourgeoisie who accumulate Capital are Jews (at least, in faith). So,
this passage confirms that the bourgeoisie are, in faith at least, Jewish. But this next
paragraph is striking -
“While this “True” Socialism thus served the government as a weapon for fighting the
German bourgeoisie, it, at the same time, directly represented a reactionary interest,
the interest of German Philistines.”
Okay, there’s that word again - “Philistine”. As explained earlier, Karl Marx uses this
to mean ethnic “anti-Semites”. In other words racist anti-Semites, rather than spiritual
anti-Semites like Karl Marx. So, Karl Marx says here that, while the German government
used a “fake” Socialism to fight the German Jewish-bourgeoisie, at the same time, all
this did was benefit the German racist anti-Semites. This requires a bit of context, so let me just explain:
For starters, just because they were anti-Semites doesn’t mean they were Socialists in the
way that Karl Marx thinks Socialism is. That’s why he puts the “True” in quotes, implying
that this German version of Socialism is “fake” Socialism.
He therefore means that the German ethnic anti-Semites (basically, “proto-Nazis) aren’t
“real” Socialists, and are a “reactionary” element, and are against Socialism. He says
that, while these so-called German Socialists did fight against some of the bourgeoisie
(the Jews), they were doing so for their own bourgeois interests only. In other words,
they were still Jews in faith, because they were capitalists-in-hiding. So Marx is saying
that German anti-Semite Socialists (or “proto-Nazis”) are “fake” Socialists. He’s saying that
they’re bourgeoisie in disguise, even if they fight ethnic Jews, which is what Socialism
does, and what he is praising. This is confirmed in this next quote -
“And on its part German Socialism recognised, more and more, its own calling as the bombastic
representative of the petty-bourgeois Philistine. It proclaimed the German nation to be the
model nation, and the German petty Philistine to be the typical man. To every villainous
meanness of this model man, it gave a hidden, higher, Socialistic interpretation, the exact
contrary of its real character.”
So yes, Karl Marx is rejecting the old German anti-Semitic “fake” Socialism because,
even though they were anti-Jewish, they were ultimately bourgeois in faith themselves.
This, of course, confirms Karl Marx’s hatred of the Jews and of the Jewish faith. That’s
why he says -
“The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian
parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy,
conquest of political power by the proletariat.”
Yes, Karl Marx wants to overthrow the bourgeoisie. He wants to overthrow the Jews. And he says
that this is what “ALL OTHER PROLETARIAN PARTIES” are aiming for. All Socialism is
anti-Semitism.
In this next quote, he says he also wants to end what he calls “bourgeois property”
(Jewish property). And he wants to abolish the Jewish family -
“Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous
proposal of the Communists.” “On what foundation is the present family,
the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed
form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement
in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.”
“The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and
both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”
Note that: it’s only the Jewish family he wants to abolish, not the idea of “family”
itself. And what’s interesting is that Karl Marx wasn’t calling for the abolition of
money, or even of “capital” in the purely-economic sense that he used it. He actually called
for a Central State Bank, which obviously can’t happen without money.
“The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital
from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State...”
Oh, but State control isn’t real Socialism. No, because anti-Semitism is real Socialism,
and State control is a means to abolish what the Socialists believe is the Judeo-Capitalist
order. Your God, Karl Marx, has made that clear. So next time one of these anti-Semites
claim that State control isn’t real Socialism, I’m going to say ‘you’re right, anti-Semitism
is real Socialism, and I’m really glad you gave me an opportunity to clarify that to
you’.
Anyway, Karl Marx is calling for the workers to steal directly from the Jews, and then
they will call for the -
“Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with
State capital and an exclusive monopoly.”
Gee! You know - I always thought that Marxists hated monopolies? That’s what they always
claim. And yet, here’s their master calling for monopolies. And I thought they didn’t
want ‘State Capitalism’? And yet, they’re God, Karl Marx, is calling for State Capitalism.
Gee - that’s strange, isn’t it? It’s almost like these morons haven’t even read
Karl Marx. Or, are just lying. Also, Marxists will claim they’re against “money”.
Okay then, what’s the purpose of a State Central Bank if “money” has been abolished?
Oh that’s right, because money won’t be abolished under Marxist rule, only the so-called
Jewish practice of ‘buying things to sell them on for profit’ will be abolished. The
State Central Bank is there to destroy the supposedly Jewish practice of accumulating
money. And this is the whole point of Socialism. All Socialism is anti-Capitalism. And all
Socialism is therefore, at its heart, anti-Semitism.
“No wonder Goebbels declared eighty years later that all socialism is antiSemitism.”
Karl Marx and Hitler both agreed on the same essential principle of all Socialisms - that
capitalism and Jewishness are entwined. They believed that capitalism was bad because it
was Jewish, and believed that Jewishness was bad because it was capitalist. Money was associated
with Jewishness, and the solution that Karl Marx and Hitler came up with to defeat Judeo-Capitalism
was a centrally planned economy where money, commodities and therefore Jewishness, had
no place. But, by doing this - by removing money and centrally planning the economy - you
also remove the Jews from society. Karl Marx, just like Hitler, was calling for the removal
of the Jews from society -
“The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”
The way they differed though was that Marx was religiously anti-Semitic, while Hitler
was ethnically anti-Semitic. Where Hitler was interested in your blood, which you couldn’t
change, Marx believed (just like Mussolini) that Jews could give up their faith in Judeo-Capitalism
and convert to a new faith - Fascism or Socialism.
“The Jews, therefore, like the bourgeoisie - of which they were seen as the epitome - had
an option: they could convert. Mussolini said that for most Jews perhaps a generation would
suffice for them to become proper Italians.”
Now, some have argued that Karl Marx was Jewish, and thus, this “proves” that he cannot
be anti-Semitic. This argument falls flat on its face when the facts are known. Karl
Marx never practiced Judaism himself. His grandfather had been the Rabbi of Nijmegen,
but his father had turned against the faith, and Karl Marx inherited his spiritual anti-Semitism
from his father.
If you’re a racist and, just like Hitler, believe that human subspecies exist (even
though science says we all come from the same tribes in Africa roughly 60,000 years ago,
which on evolutionary terms, isn’t long enough to create separate and distinct “races”,
and so the belief in “race” is just that - a cultish belief)... If you are a racist
and believe in human “races”, then you may argue that Karl Marx was “ethnically”
Jewish.
Again, race doesn’t exist, so this argument doesn’t work. But even if we accept the
religious idea that human “subspecies” exist, Karl Marx’s main argument against
the Jews is on a spiritual-level, not an ethnic one. He’s anti-Semitic in the old-fashioned
sense - religiously anti-Semitic - not necessarily racially anti-Semitic like Hitler was. Although
Karl Marx did put racism into his spiritual anti-Semitism, it just wasn’t on the same
level as Hitler.
Also, Karl Marx was a member of the bourgeoisie, and was also against the bourgeoisie. So he’s
Jewish and bourgeois, and anti-Jewish and anti-bourgeois at the same time. Just like
many things in Karl Marx’s life, and many things he said, it seems like a contradiction
to people who are logically-minded. But Karl Marx rejected logic. He believed in Hegel,
who said:
“Everything is inherently contradictory.”
Which is why Karl Marx said -
“What constitutes dialectical movement is the coexistence of two contradictory sides,
their conflict and their fusion into a new category.”
Where I would say that a contradiction means that you have a flaw in your argument, or
that something is wrong somewhere - for example, something cannot be ‘true’ but also be
‘false’ at the same time - Karl Marx on the other hand, embraced contradictions. That’s
why I would argue that NOTHING he wrote was correct, because everything he wrote was either
contradicted by something else he wrote, or can be demonstrably proven false through evidence
and logical interpretation.
But the point is that, you cannot argue that Karl Marx was “ethnically Jewish” and
therefore couldn’t hate Jews because that would be a contradiction, because Karl Marx
embraced contradictions. So the fact that he was supposedly “ethnically Jewish”
wouldn’t be a problem for him. Also, by calling him Jewish, you’re arguing that
he was a Capitalist, by Karl Marx’s own reasoning. So, unless you think Karl Marx
was a Capitalist, you are wrong. And I can’t wait for the Socialists to cry out that Karl
Marx was not a “real” Socialist! Please, please make it be so!
However, I have seen Marxist articles trying to deny the claim that Karl Marx was anti-Semitic,
basically by misrepresenting the argument that he was, stating that everyone at that
time was racist so it would be unfair to call Karl Marx a racist (which is an admission
that he was racist), hiding some of the sources (like Marxism.org not publishing Karl Marx’s
“The Russian Loan” for example), claiming that his anti-Semitism was trying to help
the Jews somehow, and by accusing those of pointing out Karl Marx’s anti-Semitism of
being anti-Semites themselves. Obviously, none of these arguments work, or are real
arguments. And I’m not going to go through them all (because there’s no point, they
don’t address the issue), but I will guard myself from the usual accusations of me somehow
being a “Fascist” or a “Nazi” or a “Racist” or whatever.
Well, for starters, I don’t believe in human “races”, and I’m not interested in one
way or another about the Jewish religion. You do your thing, I’ll do mine. Secondly,
I’ve literally done a video titled “Hitler’s Socialism” which, in addition to the 107
sources used, 350 direct references, and numerous quotes and notes, also has a section called
“National Socialism’s Fundamental Ideological Flaw”. In that section, I outline how Nationalism
Socialism (Nazism) doesn’t work on a fundamental level. If I was a Nazi, then why would I destroy
Nazism’s fundamental ideological workings? That would just be stupid, wouldn’t it.
And Fascism is Italian Socialism. I’m neither Italian, nor Socialist. So none of these accusations
are true.
Also, by Karl Marx’s own words, all Capitalists are Jews in faith. Therefore, as a proponent
of Capitalism myself, by Karl Marx’s “logic”, this means that I’m inadvertently practicing
the Jewish faith. In Karl Marx’s own words, I am a quote, “inwardly circumcised Jew”
end-quote. Therefore, your anti-Semitism is also directed at me, and all Capitalists,
and those who seek to save or accumulate money, which is Karl Marx’s definition of Capital.
You are calling for a Holocaust of the Bourgeoisie; a Revolution against the Jews. And yet, you
think that by calling people “anti-Semites” or “Fascists” will somehow exonerate you
from your own anti-Semitism? Well, just like all Socialism, it doesn’t work.
In reality, just like Hitler and the National Socialists, the reason Karl Marx was an anti-capitalist
was because he thought capitalism was Jewish, and he thought Judaism was capitalism. His
solution to the “Jewish Question” was to abolish capitalism, and abolish the Jews. Again -
“The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”
Karl Marx wants to remove the Jews from society. This is why I refer to Socialists as Denialists,
because they are denying the historical reality, and are attempting to whitewash the role of
Socialism in the Holocaust, which I strongly disagree with. Thanks for watching, bye for
now.