Hi everyone, this is Klaus.
Welcome to the Weekly News series.
First, an anti-American professor from China attracted online attention recently.
We all know that our channel has always been under attack by 50 cents army and little pinks.
They like to say,
"Anti-communism is a business. You do this for money.
If you're anti-CCP, you'll get lots of viewers."
It’s easy to refute these claims directly.
If anti-communism can make money,
it means that the CCP is detested by lots of people,
and that the CCP is like a clown in the international arena.
50 cents always think others are like themselves.
They do their job for money (they are hired by the CCP),
so they think that anti-CCP people are also hired.
I actually wish that anti-communism could really be a business.
I wish someone could back me up financially.
In fact, I think pro-communism is a business.
After all, anti-communism is still on a personal level at the moment.
No country or government openly confronts the CCP.
There's no official financial support.
But pro-communism is supported by the Chinese government.
Recently, Texas suffered a rare blizzard
leading to widespread water and power outages.
Bad news in the US is good news to China.
Professor Chen Ping at China Research Institute, Fudan University.
has just ridiculed America again.
He posted on Weibo, a Chinese social media website, saying how bad the US is,
but accidentally also revealed himself as an immigrant living in a big house in the US.
Professor Chen Ping is a model leader in "telling good Chinese stories".
He became famous for saying that
people with 2,000 RMB in China live more happily than people earning $3,000 in the US per month.
If you earn 2,000 yuan per month in China,
that's less than $1,000 in the US.
I could live much more comfortably earning 2,000 yuan in China than I do earning $3,000 in the US.
American people are living in hell. Get it?
If China were really so good,
then why did he immigrate to the United States?
Some netizens sarcastically said,
"Let's applaud Professor Chen Ping's self-sacrifice in the dire US.
Professor Chen Ping bought a new house in the US
purely for academic research.
The main purpose was to go deep into the enemy’s backyard,
closely observe the misfortune of the American people,
and thoroughly verify the theory that $3,000 is not as good as 2,000 yuan."
In fact, there are many people like Chen Ping in China,
such as Jin Canrong,
"A win-win situation means that China wins twice, you know."
Li Yi,
"Out of 1.4 billion people, only 4,000 died. That's equal to no death at all."
Sima Nan et al
"Why can’t I live in the US if I'm anti-US?
I go to the US exactly because I am anti-US."
These people actually all work for the same company, Beijing Zhongyi Network.
There are many 50 cents army leaders under this Internet company.
It's basically an Internet celebrity company.
In other words, patriotism and pro-communism is a shortcut to Internet fame.
Being a patriotic internet celebrity leads to both fame and fortune.
They use patriotism to harvest little pinks and poor ordinary folks.
At the same time, they can apply for government propaganda funds,
so they make money from both the people and the government.
As soon as they earn enough money, they will move overseas.
Jin Canrong's son's family is in the US.
Li Yi holds a U.S. green card.
Sima Nan's family also lives in the US.
On New Year's Eve in 2012, Sima Nan flew to the US to reunite with his family.
Soon after his arrival, he magically got his head caught in the elevator at the airport.
Thus, Chinese netizens learned about his immigration to the US on social media.
He responded that anti-Americanism was work, but living in the US was life,
and that work and life should be considered separately, as they are two different things.
He tried to justify himself.
But he actually spoke the truth.
Anti-Americanism is work, and to work is to make money and support the family.
In other words, patriotism is a business.
But only a true civil society is suitable for life.
China has no citizens, only slaves.
Some people who have realized this are trying their best to harvest slaves,
and then apply for citizenship of another country.
Let’s talk about another thing. Recently, Chinese officials admitted that last June,
China and India clashed in the Kalwan River Valley, and 4 Chinese soldiers died,
and released the videos.
India already announced the number of casualties last year.
20 indian soldiers died, and 43 Chinese soldiers died.
Russia, a good friend of China, also disclosed similar figures.
But China never admitted the death toll.
In August, a photo circulated on the Internet.
The photo showed a soldier named Chen Xiangrong,
who died during the clash against India in June.
He was awarded a badge of first-class merit after death.
But last year it was announced as fake news by the Chinese media.
Now it's been almost a year, and Chinese officials came out to clarify,
but the death toll they admit is only one-tenth of the number announced by India.
4 dead Chinese soldiers vs 20 dead Indian soldiers, China says.
Anyway, China won again.
A military report was issued by the Central Broadcasting Station,
and the original text is as follows,
"Battalion commander Chen Hongjun and soldier Chen Xiangrong went to the rescue of their fellows.
They fought back hard and died as heroes.
Warrior Xiao Siyuan, after breaking through, returned to rescue his comrades without hesitation.
He fought to the last moment of life.
Warrior Wang Zhuoran was on his way to supporting his fellow soldiers.
He fought hard to get his dispersed comrades out of danger.
He was submerged in the glacier."
Regarding the official report, netizen Crayon Ball said,
"The four soldiers all died trying to rescue others.
If so, those who needed rescuing must have died also.
The real death toll must have been more than 4.
This was why India announced the death toll first.
From India’s point of view, they won at a lower price."
News of the CCP has only one purpose:
to brainwash people, not to spread the truth.
But a lie is always a lie, unable to withstand scrutiny.
Recently, the General Office of the CCP Central Committee and the State Council issued
"Renaissance of Chinese Excellent Traditional Culture"
to fully revive traditional culture by 2025.
First of all, since the CCP came to power,
they have systematically destroyed traditional culture.
It is such an irony that they want to revive it now.
Besides, traditional Chinese culture is complicated.
There are various schools of thought.
What the CCP really wants to revive is the idea of ​​loyalty to the emperor and patriotism.
But they use traditional culture as a cover to implement dictatorship and cultivate nationalism,
getting people to reject ideas of western democracy in the name of cultural self-confidence,
in order to safeguard the one-party autocracy,
even Xi Jinping’s own dictatorship.
Finally,
let’s focus on Myanmar's people's protests against the military coup.
Something similar to the 1989 Tank Man appeared on the streets of Myanmar.
A woman was wielding a steel knife
before an approaching armored vehicle.
Myanmar's military did to its own people what China did to Hongkongers.
Techniques such as Internet disruption, arrests, and shooting were all learned from the CCP.
Protestors in Myanmar wrote in simplified Chinese,
"China to stop helping the military coup.
Internet technicians from China please leave immediately."
There was also a portrait of Xi Jinping manipulating his puppet Min Aungh Laing.
In the international community, China has always been on the side of dictators.
China always supports governments that suppress the people.
It supported Saddam in Iraq,
supported Maduro in Venezuela
supported Lukashenko in Belarus,
and supports the most brutal dictatorship on earth, North Korea.
These are all partners in crime with the CCP, and they are all evil.
Alright, time to hear netizens' comments.
During the last Weekly News video,
we talked about China's recent ban on clubhouse.
Netizen Yamoto Sasaki said,
"Google is banned, but there is 'Baidu'.
Twitter is banned, but there is 'Weibo'.
LINE is banned, but there is 'WeChat'.
So if Clubhouse is banned, there will definitely be a cheap knock-off.
It is very likely since China is good at plagiarizing.
There may be a Chinese version of clubhouse coming out soon."
About the Chinese Spring Festival Gala,
Netizen Jay shared his story with us,
"I’m from Taiwan, and I've been to Tianjin on business before.
At that time, the Lunar New Year was around the corner.
A few colleagues and I went to the same bedroom for hot pot together.
We turned on the TV and watched the Spring Festival Gala,
but I'm not entirely sure whether it was the Spring Festival Gala.
The show was full of praise for the good of the country
and for the great achievements of the Communist Party.
I have always known that
China is a country full of brainwashing,
but only when I saw it with my own eyes
did I feel sorry for people living in China,
and feel happy about me being Taiwanese,
growing up in an open and transparent society,
where the people have the right to decide who leads the county.
After returning to Taiwan, I felt that even though Taiwan might not be good at everything,
separated by a strait are completely two different worlds.
The experience really made me feel lucky."
Okay, that's all for this video.
Please like, subscribe, comment and share.
This is Klaus. See you next time.