THE QR CODE ON YOUR SCREEN OR
GO TO foxnews.com/APPS
>> DO YOU PLAN ON STEPPING DOWN
FROM THE COMMITTEE OR ANYTHING
LIKE THAT OR RESIGNING FROM
CONGRESS?
CAN YOU TELL US ANYTHING ABOUT
YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH MS. FANG?
ANYTHING IN GENERAL?
CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL?
>> Sandra: SILENCE.
ERIC SWALWELL NOT ANSWERING
QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS PAST TIES
TO A SUSPECTED CHINESE SPY AS
CALLS FOR HIM TO STEP DOWN THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE ARE
GROWING.
JOSH HAWLEY IS A MEMBER OF THE
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.
THAT MOMENT, GOOD MORNING.
THAT MOMENT HAPPENED YESTERDAY
IN ERIC SWALWELL RETURNING TO
HIS HOME IN THE WASHINGTON AREA
OUT FOR A RUN.
HE WAS ASKED QUESTIONS ON THIS,
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS THAT THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WANTING
ANSWERS TO.
HE SAID NOTHING.
>> WELL, I CAN’T IMAGINE WHY
THIS GUY IS STILL ON THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE AND WHY
WE STILL DON’T HAVE THE DETAILS
OF WHAT HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH
THIS CHINESE SPY WAS.
WE KNOW THE SPY RAISED MONEY
FOR HIM FOR HEAVEN SAKE.
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT AN
ELECTION INTEGRITY ISSUE.
CHINESE SPIES RAISING MONEY FOR
DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS, BUNDLING
MONEY AND PUTTING PEOPLE IN HIS
OFFICE.
IT IS EXTRAORDINARY AND AGAIN I
CAN’T BELIEVE HE IS STILL ON
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE OVER
AT THE HOUSE.
>> Sandra: BRAD WENSTRUP FROM
THAT COMMITTEE JOINED ME
YESTERDAY AND SAID THIS.
>> WE WOULD NEED TO KNOW WHAT
NANCY PELOSI KNEW AND WHEN SHE
KNEW IT.
SAME WITH ADAM SCHIFF AND SAME
WITH SWALWELL AND SAME WITH THE
F.B.I.
THAT’S THE ONLY WAY WE’LL GET
TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS.
THIS IS NOT GOING "WAY, I CAN
PROMISE YOU THAT.
WE HAVE TO GET THESE ANSWERS.
>> Sandra: ALL RIGHT.
THERE IS AN F.B.I. BRIEFING AS
WE JUST REPORTED THIS AFTERNOON
APPARENTLY KEVIN MCCARTHY WILL
BE THERE, NANCY PELOSI MAY BE
THERE AS WELL.
WE DON’T KNOW YET.
HOW FAR DO YOU WANT TO SEE YOUR
REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES,
PARTICULARLY ON THAT COMMITTEE,
PUSH FOR ANSWERS?
ARE YOU, TOO, GAME FOR CALLING
FOR THE REMOVAL OF HIM FROM
THIS COMMITTEE IN THE MEANTIME?
>> I THINK HE SHOULD BE OFF THE
COMMITTEE.
THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT.
I CAN’T BELIEVE HE IS STILL ON
IT.
I THINK WE’VE GOT TO FIGURE OUT
WHAT IN THE WORLD WENT ON THERE
IN TERMS OF THIS SPY.
WHAT EXACTLY -- WHAT MONEY DID
SHE RAISE FOR HIM.
WAS IT LEGAL, FOREIGN MONEY,
WHAT INFLUENCE DID SHE HAVE IN
THE OFFICE?
SHE GOT PEOPLE PLACED IN HIS
CAPITOL HILL OFFICE.
WERE THEY ALSO CONNECTED TO THE
CHINESE GOVERNMENT?
THIS IS A MAJOR ESPIONAGE ISSUE.
IT IS NOT THE ONLY ONE OUT OF
CALIFORNIA.
DEMOCRAT DIANNE FEINSTEIN IN
CALIFORNIA HAD A CHINESE SPY ON
HER STAFF FOR YEARS.
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH NANCY
PELOSI’S CALIFORNIA DEMOCRAT
PARTY?
I THINK WE NEED TO GET SOME
ANSWERS.
>> Sandra: SENATOR, IT BOGGLES
ME KNOWING THERE ARE QUESTIONS
NOT BEING ANSWERED AND A
POSSIBLE COMPROMISED
CONGRESSMAN SITTING ON AN INTEL
COMMITTEE RECEIVING CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION THAT MORE ISN’T
BEING DONE FASTER ON THIS ISSUE.
SO ARE YOU GOING TO GET THE
DETAILS OF THIS F.B.I. BRIEFING
THIS AFTERNOON?
ARE YOU GOING TO ASK FOR WHAT
THEY’RE TOLD BY THE F.B.I.?
>> I CERTAINLY WILL BUT IT
HASN’T BEEN OFFERED TO SENATORS.
NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
I CERTAINLY HAVEN’T BEEN
INVITED.
TO YOUR POINT, THIS JUST SHOWS
YOU THAT WE REALLY STILL HAVE
NO IDEA OVER A WEEK, WHAT IS IT
TWO WEEKS SINCE THE STORY
BROKE, WE STILL HAVE NO IDEA,
REALLY, OF THE DETAILS, OF THE
DEPTH OF THE CHINESE
ESPIONAGE’S RING ABILITY TO GET
INSIDE THAT OFFICE, INSIDE
SWALWELL’S CAMPAIGN.
WHAT OTHER INFORMATION THEY MAY
HAVE GATHERED.
WE’RE TOTALLY IN THE DARK.
>> Sandra: WE’LL WAIT MORE
DETAILS ON THAT IN THE MEANTIME
I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE
NEXT ROUND OF STIMULUS FOR THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE.
I KNOW THAT YOU ARE CALLING FOR
SOMETHING GREATER.
HERE IS MITCH MCCONNELL I
BELIEVE A FEW MOMENTS AGO ON
THIS, NEWS FROM HIM.
LISTEN.
>> IN FACT I’M MORE OPTIMISTIC
NOW THAN I WAS LAST NIGHT THAT
A BIPARTISAN FRAMEWORK FOR A
MAJOR RESCUE PACKAGE IS VERY
CLOSE AT HAND.
>> Sandra: SO IS THIS GOING TO
HAPPEN?
>> I CAN TELL YOU THIS, I’M
CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO CONSENT
TO THE SENATE GOING HOME FOR
CHRISTMAS UNTIL WE’VE VOTED ON
DIRECT RELIEF FOR WORKING
FAMILIES IN AMERICA.
I WILL NOT CONSENT TO IT.
I WILL GO TO THE FLOOR SHORTLY
IN ABOUT AN HOUR AND ASK FOR AN
UP AND DOWN VOTE FOR $1200 FOR
INDIVIDUALS AND $2400 FOR
COUPLES AND $500.
THIS HAS TO BE IN THE COVID
RELIEF BILL.
IF IT IS NOT I WILL NOT CONSENT
TO THE SENATE LEAVING.
>> Sandra: WHY IS THAT YOUR
REQUEST?
WHY ARE YOU GOING THERE WITH IT?
>> WORKING FAMILIES ARE IN
DESPERATE NEED.
WE HAVE UNEMPLOYMENT NOW EDGING
BACK UP.
MILLIONS OF WORKING FOLKS WHO
ARE OUT OF WORK AND OTHER FOLKS
WHO HAVE WORK BUT MISSING
SHIFTS AND TAKING WAGE
REDUCTIONS BECAUSE OF COVID.
THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO GO TO THE
DOCTOR OR BUY FOOD.
THE FOOD NEEDS IN THIS COUNTRY
ARE EXPLODING.
WORKING PEOPLE OUGHT TO BE
FIRST IN LINE FOR RELIEF, NOT
LAST.
LET’S NOT FORGET THEY WERE LEFT
OUT COMPLETELY INITIALLY OF THE
COVID RELIEF DEALS.
NO DIRECT RELIEF EVEN A NEW
DAYS AGO.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WORKING
PEOPLE GET RELIEF.
THEY OUGHT TO BE TOP PRIORITY.
>> Sandra: DOES THAT GIVE THEM
THE HELP THEY NEED
>> A DIRECT CHECK FOR $1200 FOR
EVERY INDIVIDUAL.
WORKING PEOPLE.
IT IS TARGETED.
FOR THOSE FOLKS IT WOULD MAKE A
TREMENDOUS DIFFERENCE.
IT LETS THEM MAKE THE DECISIONS
WHAT IS BEST FOR THEIR FAMILY.
THAT’S WHAT WE NEED TO DO.
>> Sandra: QUICKLY IF I COULD
CIRCLE BACK ON THIS ERIC
SWALWELL STORY.
FOR A SECOND THERE IN THE LOWER
THIRD IT IDENTIFIED HIM AS
REPUBLICAN FROM MISSOURI.
HE IS A DEMOCRAT FROM
CALIFORNIA TO BE CLEAR ON THAT.
IF YOU COULD BEING THAT THE
STORY WILL MOVE FORWARD THIS
AFTERNOON WITH THE F.B.I.
BRIEFING, I ASKED YOU HOW FAR
YOU WANT TO SEE YOUR REPUBLICAN
COLLEAGUES PUSH ON THIS STORY
BUT HOW CRUCIAL IS IT TO GET TO
THE BOTTOM OF THIS WHEN YOU
LOOK AT HOW WIDESPREAD THE
ESPIONAGE AND SPY RINGS ARE AND
WHAT YOU SEE IN WASHINGTON
>> SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAD
A CHINESE SPY ON HER STAFF.
YOU LOOK AT THE FACT THE
CHINESE WERE ABLE TO ERIC
SWALWELL TO DEVELOP A YEAR’S
LONG RELATIONSHIP AND GET
ACCESS TO THE INNER WORKINGS OF
HIS STAFF AND ACCESS TO HIS
CAPITOL HILL OFFICE.
GET ACCESS TO HIS CAMPAIGN.
THAT’S EXTRAORDINARY.
LOOK AT HUNTER BIDEN, BY THE
WAY.
>> Sandra: WHAT ARE WE DOING TO
STOP THIS AND TO TRY TO WEED
THIS OUT?
>> WELL, WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN
IS OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH CHINA
NEEDS TO BE TOTALLY
RE-EXAMINEED.
WE NEED TO CUT OFF THESE
ESPIONAGE HAS GOT TO BE CUT OFF
AT THE KNEES.
SHUT DOWN THINGS LIKE TIK TOK
AND OUT OF THE TRADE DEALS WITH
CHINA.
CHINA HAS BEEN ABLE TO DO
WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO.
THE ESPIONAGE IS THE LATEST.
BACK TO SWALWELL AT THE VERY
LEAST HE OUGHT TO BE OFF THIS
COMMITTEE, THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE?
IT IS UNBELIEVABLE.