Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe,
brought to you by The Thunderbolts Project™
at Thunderbolts.info
Today, we continue our exploration of the recent update shared by the team
behind the groundbreaking scientific experiment, the SAFIRE project.
As described in our recent interviews with physicist Wal Thornhill, the SAFIRE
project is an independent audit of the Electric Sun model first proposed by
engineer Ralph Juergens in the 1970s.
As Thornhill noted, Thunderbolts colleague Dr. Donald Scott also extended Juergens'
Electric Sun model through his recognition of what is called the PNP
transistor action of anode tufts or photospheric granulations on the Sun,
which were successfully reproduced in SAFIRE's phase one -- proof of concept.
In this episode, Dr. Scott shares his thoughts on SAFIRE's most exciting
results to date, including the evidence, that is produced, of low-energy nuclear transmutations.
For over a hundred years now, since Eddington first dictated that
he knew the answer how did the Sun make all its power and all that energy, where
does it come from, it came from the fusion of hydrogen into helium.
And they, everybody immediately sucked that up, because Einstein was in his glory at
that time, the atomic nuclear chemistry was in the news and so yeah, that's and
we got it, that's the way it is, stars make their energy from hydrogen to helium fusion.
And then, some hundred years went by and nobody had
questioned that until finally, I guess you know, we also realized that there has
been 200 years of people looking at the Sun through spectroscopes.
And we've managed to discover about 68 of the known chemicals, that is to say
elements, on the Sun, in the Sun's atmosphere, they're there, they're in the
Sun, where did they come from, if the Sun gets its energy from this hydrogen helium fusion?
OK, I see where the hydrogen and helium
came from, but where did the calcium and the manganese and the titanium and
all the rest of it come from?
And the standard answer is oh, it was made by explosions in novae stars, way up
somewhere in our galaxy or even in other galaxies, and then those
explosions blew it all over the place like, it's like fairy dust, fairy dust
spreading through the cosmos and then it, that settled on our star.
But that has nothing to do with our star, stars are only hydrogen and helium.
What Monty did was not to falsify, I mean, I say Monty but of
course, it's everybody on the team.
But to simply give a real, we have done it here in our lab, not explanation but example
that yes, you can form these other elements in a very, well, let's say non-
hydrogen bomb kind of way, that is to say, you do it in the laboratory in
a, yes, it requires something, this magnificent SAFIRE, but the
only reason we need SAFIRE is because we can't duplicate the Sun in our own
laboratories here on Earth, we'd burn the place up.
So what we're trying to do is to model the Sun, we're trying to come up
with example here in our lab of how the Sun works, and he's done a very good job
and he's produced exactly what we see in the Sun.
It is obvious now that those other elements are indeed made right in
our Sun and very probably in all other stars, at least most other stars, and it
is done not in the core of the Sun but on the surface.
If you look at Monty's film, those other elements
appear on the surface of the anode and it's done electrically through electric
plasma, and I just think it's almost obvious that we don't need any more fairy
tales about explosions of novae in Alpha Centauri.
I did predict that, back in my, when I first wrote my book
in 2006, I said that, "Whatever nuclear fusion is taking place on the
Sun is likely occurring in the double- layer above the photosphere, not
deep within the Sun's core. And the products of this fusion process are the
metals that give rise to the absorption lines in the Sun's spectrum."
And I think, Monty's work has certainly shown that
that is very likely the answer, that's what's happening.
The point is that it really isn't that important.
It's not our purpose to disprove or falsify their answers, but SAFIRE
has offered a very good reason why there are the other types of elements and even
some molecules formed that are not from these
novae explosions gazillion light-years away.
Couple of observations I made when I looked at that film.
You will notice there that Monty was very excited by, and I can see why, I am
excited by it too -- he found in the very powerful scanning electron microscope photos,
a sphere, and he found that at the highest magnification he was able to get to,
when they were looking and they found all these other calcium, sodium
and all the rest of it in there, that had not started there but was formed there.
Right down in the middle of this was a little sphere, and I'm not sure if they
figured out what that sphere was yet, but the first
thing that occurred to me was uh-huh, a sphere!
Well, have we in the Electric Universe ever come upon
anything like that?
Well, what about C.J. Ransom and Wal's blueberries that they formed in C.J.'s lab?
And we saw those, they're called "the Martian blueberries" for the reason that
they were first discovered on the surface of the planet Mars, and as Monty
pointed out, nobody knew or could figure out why these things were in such nice little spheres?
So there they are, they found, it could be, at least I think
they should further investigate is that, the genesis of these Martian blueberries
in a process very much like this.
The other thing that I did notice is, if you look very carefully at
the image that Monty presents there, in that video, at those little spherules, you
will see that the equator, if you will, is slightly raised and it looked like
the last Space News with, who was it, Wal talking about Bennu and the other one
and yeah, they have this strange shape, and there is this raised equator.
Well, if you look very carefully at that little sphere that Monty found with his
scanning microscope, that too has a raised equator, and so we're seeing when
things begin to jibe like that, that begins to make you think gee, maybe we
should see and think about why they're the same, what's going on there.
That's all I really have to say about the video
except to say that I think it's magnificent, I think the future does
maybe hold jobs for the SAFIRE-like reactor, for the remediation of nuclear
radiation from decaying atomic fuel, you know.
As said, you don't have to bury it in there in Nevada someplace but can we
make it, can we decontaminate the fuel by somehow treating it?
It's all in the future and it's all possible and it's all wonderful.
But the point is, I think, what we really should celebrate and be happy
about is, that SAFIRE has definitely shown that we don't need these
explosions on these far, far distant stars to explain how the fairy dust got
spread through the cosmos.
It's formed right there on the surface of our Sun.