With the release of HomePod, Apple threw their hat in the smart speaker ring after seeing
companies like Amazon and Google experiences success in the market.
But Apple decided to approach the smart speaker from a different angle, by making sound quality
the product’s primary focus instead of its voice assistant.
And this created some issues that is preventing the HomePod from competing on the same level
as the Amazon Echo and Google Home.
And despite being on sale for well over a year, HomePod hasn’t achieved the kind of
success Apple was aiming for, capturing just 6% of the smart speaker market at the end
of 2018.
And in this video we’re going to explore the reasons why the HomePod is failing to
live up to Apple’s expectations.
This is Greg with Apple Explained and I want to thank RocketBody for sponsoring this video.
RocketBody is an app that uses an ECG reading from your Apple Watch to measure you’re
readiness for different types of workouts.
Try out the free trial today by clicking the link in the description.
Now if you want to help decide which topics I cover, make sure you’re subscribed and
these voting polls will show up in your mobile activity feed.
So before we talk about Apple’s struggles with the HomePod, I should mention that this
wasn’t Apple’s first attempt at making a speaker system.
Back in 2006 the company introduced the iPod Hi-Fi, which was a stereo speaker designed
to work seamlessly with any iPod.
It actually came with 8 different docks that you could switch out depending on which iPod
model you were using.
And while the iPod Hi-Fi wasn’t a smart speaker, it did share a couple similarities
to the HomePod.
First, being it focus on sound quality.
There were a lot of stereo speakers dedicated to the iPod back then, some of which, like
the iHome, were very popular.
But they didn’t offer hi fidelity sound quality.
And we’re seeing the same trend today with smart speakers.
The most popular of which, like the Amazon Echo and Google Home, don’t offer best-in-class
sound.
Instead, their voice assistant features are their biggest selling point.
But there’s one more similarity between the HomePod and iPod Hi-Fi, and that is their
price.
They both debuted with price tags of $350, which is pretty steep considering other products
on the market.
In fact, the HomePods competitors share the same $100 price point as the iPod Hi-Fi’s
biggest competitor, the iHome.
It’s actually pretty fascinating how similar the modern smart speaker market is compared
to the iPod speaker market of the mid-2000’s.
So it shouldn’t be to surprising that the HomePod is experiencing similar issues as
the iPod Hi-Fi.
One of the biggest being sales success.
Apple struggled to convince customers that the $350 iPod Hi-Fi offered 3.5x the value
of the $100 iHome.
Sure, the Hi-Fi had better sound quality, but that was about it.
And considering the iHome had a built-in digital clock, a more compact and portable form factor,
and a much more affordable price, you can see why the iPod Hi-Fi was a hard sell.
Apple eventually discontinued on the product one year after its release, just as rumors
of an iPod Hi-Fi mini were picking up steam.
Now how does that circumstance compare to the HomePod’s.
Well, again, there are some similarities and differences.
The HomePod is also having a hard time convincing customers that it’s worth $350.
In fact, soon after it was released, Apple had to cut their HomePod orders from 500,000
a month to 200,000 due to lack of demand.
And that wasn’t the only cut Apple had to make.
This past April they cut the HomePod’s price from $350 to $300.
But according to recent reports, that still wasn’t enough to bolster demand.
So why isn’t Apple selling as many HomePods as they expected?
After all, it does have some incredible features that the failed iPod Hi-Fi never did.
Things like Siri, adaptive sound, stereo support, AirPlay, native Apple Music support, a microphone
array, and a more compact design.
So what’s preventing customers from making the purchase?
Well, the answer becomes clear when you take a look at what the Amazon Echo and Google
Home have to offer.
For just $100, the Echo offers what some are calling “amazing sound” in addition to
an extensive list of smart speaker features.
Not only does it natively support the free and paid versions of Amazon Music, but the
Echo also works with Prime Music, Pandora, TuneIn, iHeart, Spotify, and Sirius XM.
The HomePod only natively supports Apple Music.
If you want it to play music from any other service, you’ll have to use Airplay from
an Apple device.
You can also use more voice commands with the Amazon Echo, including ordering items
from Amazon.
With the HomePod, you’re limited to whatever Siri is capable of doing.
So there are clear compromises Apple is making with the HomePod by emphasizing sound quality
above all else.
And while this may be a good approach for audiophiles, the vast majority of customers
are more than satisfied with a smart speaker that sounds good enough, and costs a third
of the price.
And if you take a look at the HomePod’s website, you’ll notice that Apple doesn’t
put a heavy emphasis on Siri in its marketing.
The voice assistant is actually the last feature listed.
And this approach may sound familiar, since it’s one they took with the AirPods.
Which has Siri integration, but are first and foremost wireless headphones.
And Apple actually suggests this connection between the two products by using the same
“pod” suffix in their names.
And I think that’s important to recognize, because if Apple anticipated demand for the
HomePod would be even half of what it was for the AirPods, it makes sense that they
were preparing to sell half a million units per month.
But we know Apple wasn’t even close to reaching those targets and the reason comes down to
the approach they took with the HomePod.
You see, there are two ways of thinking about a smart speaker.
The first way is thinking of it as a personal assistant like the Amazon Echo.
A product that helps you buy things from Amazon, create reminds, set timers, or answer trivial
questions just by using your voice.
There’s not a focus on high fidelity audio.
But the second way of thinking about a smart speaker is completely different, which is
the direction Apple took with the HomePod.
It does include some of the personal assistant capabilities of the Amazon Echo, it doesn’t
focus on those features.
Instead, Apple positioned the product as a high fidelity speaker system.
Just like they positioned the AirPods as high quality wireless headphones.
And so it really isn’t fair to compare the Google Home or Amazon to the HomePod, since
it’s a fundamentally different product.
The problem is it’s still technically a smart speaker and included in the same market.
Now even though the HomePod is failing to meet Apple’s sales forecasts, that doesn’t
necessarily mean it is a failed product.
Apple doesn’t release unit sales numbers anymore but it’s estimated that they sold
2-2.5 million HomePods in its first twelve months on the market.
And that is comparable to the 2.4 million Amazon Echo units that were sold in its first
year.
The only problem is Amazon almost tripled those number in the products second year,
which the HomePod shows no signs of doing.
It’s also worth noting that while the HomePod only has about 8-9 percent of the smart speaker
market, it’s a $300 product competing with not only $100 speakers like the Amazon Echo
and Google Home, but also $50 speakers like the Echo Dot and Google Home mini.
And many believe Apple recognizes the HomePod’s pricing issue and it’s why theres rumors
of a stripped down, lower-cost model in the works.
But what’s fascinating to me about all this is how similar the HomePod’s story is playing
out compared to the iPod Hi-Fi over a decade before.
Because the Hi-Fi also failed to meet Apple’s sales forecast, it also captured about 7%
of the iPod speaker market, it was also competing against lower cost rivals which compromised
on sound quality, and rumors also surfaced of Apple making a stripped-down model at a
lower price point.
So in my mind, it’s worth asking if the HomePod’s story will end the same way as
the Hi-Fi, will it be discontinued sometime this year?
Well, it’s hard to say, but I highly doubt it, and here’s why.
With the iPod Hi-Fi, it was clear Apple wasn’t making any improvements or investing any more
time into the product shortly before it was discontinued.
But when it comes to the HomePod, the story changes quite a bit.
Apple is continuing to roll out the HomePod internationally with its most recent release
in Japan on August 23rd.
And I don’t think that’s something Apple would bother doing if they were taking it
off the market in the coming months.
Also, new software features are being rolled out to the HomePod this fall with iOS 13.
You’ll actually be able to handoff music you’re playing from your phone to the HomePod
by simply holding your device near the speaker.
And again, that demonstrates resources being invested in the product which didn’t happen
with the iPod Hi-Fi.
So while the HomePod may very well be a failure at this point in time, I don’t think it’ll
see the same fate as the iPod Hi-Fi.
Because although it isn’t selling as well as Apple had hoped, it’s still generating
quite a bit of revenue for the company and further entrenching users in services like
Apple Music.
And with new software features coming to the HomePod it’s pretty clear that Apple isn’t
giving up on the product just yet.
And I think we may be seeing a new lower-cost model in the near future which could really
boost Apple’s position in the smart speaker market.
Now let’s talk about a product that has been a wild success, and that’s the Series
4 Apple Watch, which gives you the ability to take ECG readings right from your wrist.
And now thank’s to the technology developed at RocketBody, that ECG-reading can be used
to turn your Apple Watch and iPhone into a personal fitness trainer.
The Rocketbody app provides precise readings of your body condition during a training session
and throughout the day, determining your readiness for the next workout.
But my favorite feature of the app is its ability to completely personalize my training.
Customized workouts are generated based on my physical condition, taken through the ECG
immediately before the workout starts.
This ensures my time at the gym is used efficiently to achieve my fitness goals as soon as possible.
So if you do any sort of exercise I highly recommend trying this app out, which you can
do for free with a 14-day trial.
The link for that is in the description.
And be sure to leave a review on Product Hunt to let the developers know what you think
of the app.
Alright guys thanks for watching and I’ll see you next time.