according to 20 verses nubert 20 who was
also a private sperm donor was allowed
visitation rights as long as he came to
terms with the hours set forth by the
parents so if we're sticking to past
precedent
I mean mr. Latimer wasn't stalking he
was clearly within his rights to ask for
visitation
but swinney was a one time sperm donor
and in our case the defendant was an
habitual sperm donor who also happens to
be harassing the parents in his quest
for visitation
well yeah but I mean without this man's
sperm the child in question wouldn't
exist now you're thinking like a lawyer
yes ms Woods although mr. Huntington
makes an excellent point
I have to wonder if the defendant kept a
thorough record of every sperm emission
made throughout his life interesting why
do you ask
well unless the defendant attempted to
contact every single one-night stand to
determine if a child resulted in those
unions he has no parental claim over
this child whatsoever why now why this
sperm I see your point and for that
matter all masturbatory emissions where
his sperm was clearly not seeking an egg
could be termed reckless abandonment I
believe you've just won your case
ms Woods you did well today really
you're applying for my internship aren't
you I don't know hey should you have a
resume miss pink Oh in its center I
think it gives it a little something
extra don't you think okay we'll see you
next class
you