and I’l tell you all about it in this video.
Hey there, I'm Rebecca Zung.
I'm an attorney.
I'm also a narcissist negotiation expert
and in these videos and on this channel,
I teach you all about how to break free
from narcissistic relationships.
So make sure that you subscribe
to this channel and hit that notification bell.
I upload brand new content every single day
and I want to help you break free from the
drama, trauma and chaos of narcissistic relationships.
Okay, so getting into
what's going on with Amber Heard and how
many times she has been caught lying
in front of the court.
I'm going to break down so many times that
she has been caught lying with
this court and the judge is fed up.
Now.
Let me tell you something.
Judges do not like liars.
They do not like liars more than anything
because they see it as a personal affront to the court
and when you go before the judge,
as a court of law, your credibility is evrything.
When you lose your credibility,
you basically lose everything
and especially when you've got a jury sitting there.
You want that jury to think that you are the believable one.
You want that jury to believe everything
that's coming out of your mouth.
You know, I mean, it's one thing to
maybe one time if there's some kind of
inconsistency that you can maybe rationalize
but several.
So what I'm going to do in this video
is point out that there are several inconsistencies
and when you get to so many that the judge
is actually kind of schooling you on it,
there's going to be a problem.
So the most recent one,
where the judge actually schooled her
was with regard to the first time
Johnny got aggressive with her
and this goes back to an incident,
I guess happened in 2012-2013, who knows
and it was referring to when I guess the police got involved
and what she was saying,
she was being questioned by her own attorney,
Elaine Bredehoft and she previously said,
claimed that Johnny, the first time that Johnny
got aggressive with her was when he was arrested
in 2013
then she takes the witness stand on May 16th,
and she testifies that the first time
that he got aggressive with her was in 2012.
Now the story changes, right?
Now her lawyer has to try to rehabilitate
her and she gets questioned about this
and when she gets questioned about it,
she is back and forth, trying to figure out why,
you know, she couldn't remember it correctly
and she ends up saying something super lame
like my memory doesn't work that way or something
really super lame.
Believe me.
I've been there in that position
when my client hasn't told the truth before,
and it's not a fun position in a lot of ways.
I actually feel for her lawyer.
You know, where she's trying to
rehabilitate her clients credibility
and you know, she's basically saying,
oh, that's not how my memory works or something like that.
Then the judge Penny Azcarate
says something like
you better be careful about wilfully disregarding the
truth because if you're potentially lying to the court,
you're going to be in trouble.
Perjury is a big massive offense
so you better be careful and when you
hear words like that from the judge,
you know, you're in trouble
and and by the way, how is it that she's remembering
all of these other
details about dirty carpet and bees and
all these other details
and she doesn't remember
the first time that this guy was aggressive with her.
It seems really really suspect
and by the way, during her testimony about the first time
he got aggressive with her,
she even says something like I will never forget it.
It changed my life.
You know, so she even said it was life-changing
at she couldn't remember the year when it happened.
So very very suspect and I'm quite
sure that won't be lost on the jury.
So we'll see
and if the jury doesn't buy her testimony,
doesn't buy her as a credible witness.
Then her whole entire case is going to be suspect.
Several other times that her story
didn't add up
the Milani makeup situation,
where she said that she
used a particular cover up kit.
The Milani plus perfect all-in-one correcting kit.
Her lawyer held up a particular
correcting kit said that this was the kit
that she used the entire time
to cover up bruises.
Amber said, oh I used the pink's for
the certain days.
As time went on,
it became this color and then that
color and as they developed blah blah blah,
but then you know,
the only problem with that is that Milani
itself ame out and said,
hey, by the way, we didn't even make that kit
until 2017 and the time period that Amber
was testifying about was 2014 to 2016.
Again, that's a problem.
Now, I guess one could say that maybe that kit
was representative of a kit that she was using.
I don't know.
Again it seems suspect.
Another problem was
when she said that,
Johnny Depp was extremely jealous of her
and so therefore, she didn't take any roles
that were of a sexual nature the
entire time that she was in a relationship with him.
Yet there she is in a Magic Mike movie
doing super raunchy scenes with Channing Tatum.
Very very easily verifiable.
Why would she say things like that?
When it's something that's
extremely public and easily verifiable.
I mean, that's just not even a smart thing to do,
and she even did videos interviews
after the movie where she said,
I was brought in, we did the scenes together.
It was really, really fun.
We laughed the entire time.
This is not a person who seemed like she
was afraid of her jealous husband by the way.
Okay.
So another one was she testified about this dog situation
and how he held her dog out the window.
She said it was really eerie.
She seemed like a horrified that he
held her dog out the window
and then right after she testifies about that,
it was almost like she was daring people to see this
where she holds her own dog
out the window on social media.
Had to put a picture of it.
Where she's holding her own dog out
the window of her car.
It's crazy.
Why would she bother to do that
where everybody is going to see that?
Insanity.
Another one was where she said that
he hit her across the face with these rings.
She testified that he always were these rings.
He hit her across the face,
but there were no marks or bruises
or cuts on her face.
Not one single mark on her face yet
he were these massive huge chunky rings.
Nothing on her face.
So that's an issue.
Another one was where she said in March of 2013.
There was a picture that debunked
her claim of allegations of abuse the night before
they had some sort of a function with Keith Richards
of The Rolling Stones
and she said, she had been assaulted the night before.
Again something with the face,
not one single hint of an injury on her face.
Another one was where she said
that she had massive injuries on her face
the night before she appeared on James Corden.
She said she had black eyes
and a massive injury to her.
No swelling of her nose
and you can see when she goes on James Corden.
I mean makeup will only do so much.
There's absolutely no swelling to her nose.
No injuries on her nose
and in addition to that,
there was a woman who I think
her name was, her last name was McMillan or something like that
who had even seen her that day
without makeup who said there were no black eyes,
no swelling of the nose.
Nothing.
Another one was the donations
the donations to the ACLU and to Children's Hospital
where she had gone on television.
She had expressly stated to the world that she had donated
this 7 million dollar settlement to charity
and then admitted under oath that she had donated
not even one penny to charity.
That she still had it all in her possession or whatever.
She hasn't spent
but she hadn't donated any of it to charity.
These things really overrode at one's credibility
and if the jury is taking note of all of that,
she's not going to be looking
like this sympathetic person,
and especially because she's lying about
things like domestic violence or donating to charity and,
you know, major things.
She's not lying about,
you know, whether she wore
white one day instead of yellow or,
you know, things that are of no consequence.
These are things that are major
major things that are extremely hurtful to a lot of people
and obviously there was a psychologist
that was hired by Depp’s legal team
who did testify that she has borderline
personality disorder.
Histrionic personality disorder.
She testified that she has PTSD.
Obviously. It was a psychologist hired by depths team
So there will be a bias involved,
you know, so the jury will have
to look at that and weigh that in terms of bias
meaning that with somebody that was hired by Depp’s team,
but taking that into consideration,
if that's true, if it's true that she does have
these types of disorders.
Maybe it's because she does have
these disorders that causes her to,
you know, want to create drama in her
life and take that all into consideration
and thinking about what it is
that she may be creating here.
Who knows?
Maybe there is a certain amount of truth
to some of the things that she's saying,
but it seems to me that there are certain
inconsistencies in a lot of what she is saying as well,
and because there are a lot of inconsistencies,
it is a eroding at her credibility
and because it is a eroding at her credibility too
especially to he extent that
she is now being schooled by
the judge especially in front of the jury.
That is going to end up being an issue for her.
I would love to know what you think.
By the way, I've done other videos on this.
I did a video on my reaction to her cross-examination.
I would definitely check that out as well.
I would love to know what your comments are below,
put them in the comments below.
Make sure you subscribe to this channel.
Hit that notification bell.
If you are getting ready to negotiate,
make sure to grab my free
Crush my negotiation prep worksheet,
at winmynegotiation.com.
Feel free to join my free private Facebook group as well
Narcissist Negotiators with Rebecca Zung.
Make sure you like this video.
Give it a like,
give it a share
and thank you so much for stopping by
and I will see all of you guys in the next video.