AFTER BILL O'REILLY'S DEPARTURE FROM FOX NEWS
THAT WAS ANNOUNCED YESTERDAY, MANY OF HIS A RILEY FACTOR FANS
HAVE COME OUT TO EXPRESS THEIR DISAPPOINTMENT WITH THE DECISION
EVEN THREATENING TO BOYCOTT FOX NEWS AS A FORM OF PROTEST.
NOW THEY HAVE TAKEN THEIR CONCERNS TO FACEBOOK.
FACEBOOK FOX NEWS IS FACEBOOK HAVEN'T HAS AN EXCELLENT
ADDRESS ISSUE GUESS SO THEY ARE JUST OUT OF COMMENTING ON OTHER
ARTICLES SO I'M GOING TO REDO SOME OF MY PERSONAL FAVORITES.
THIS ONE SAYS BUT THE REAL STORY NOW IS BYE-BYE FOX I FOUND
FOX NEWS BECAUSE OF BILL AND ONLY BECAUSE A BILL, LED
SOME TO BID TRAMPS CLAIM HARASSMENT, WHATEVER.
SORRY, BUT AS A WOMAN I KNOW FAR TOO WELL THAT THE THOUGHT
OF DOLLARS DOES TO SOME AND FACE THEM IN WITH HIS CASH IMPOSITION
WILL GET HIT, SO GET THE FACTS AND MAKE A WRONG TAKEN BACKERS
SINK INTO THE SHIP WHOLE CNN IS IN YOUR DESERVE EACH OTHER.
LET'S PAUSE THEREFORE A SECOND THOUGHT
LET'S DO THAT.
SHELLEY MARIE JUST SAID AS A WOMAN I KNOW FAR TOO WELL
WHAT THE THOUGHT OF DOLLARS DOES TO SOME THOUGHT I WONDER IF
SHE REALLY THOUGHT THAT SHE IS PRO-WOMEN OR SHE IS LIKE
NO, WOMEN ARE TERRIBLE, I KNOW BECAUSE AS A WOMAN I KNOW
THERE'S A LOT OF MONEY GUARDING PEOPLE OUT THERE.
DO YOU GUYS THINK SHE GETS IT AND IS AGAINST WOMEN?
WE INTERVIEWED A BUNCH OF PEOPLE INTIMACY POLITICS DURING
THE CAMPAIGN, GUYS AND THEY WERE WOMEN SAYING WE CAN HAVE A
WOMAN PRESIDENT.
THAT IS DANGEROUS.
SHE MIGHT EITHER BE LIKE YEAH, THAT'S AWESOME.
MEN ARE BETTER THAN US OR SHE MIGHT ACTUALLY THINK THAT
SHE IS A CHAMPION OF WOMEN AND OTHER OTHER WOMEN ARE JUST
LOOKING FOR CASH.
I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE STANDS ON WOMEN IN GENERAL.
I THINK IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE WHEN YOU ARE SPECIFICALLY
TALKING ABOUT WOMEN WHO COME OUT AND EXPRESS THEIR CONCERNS OR
EXPERIENCE WITH SEXUAL-HARASSMENT YOU ARE
WALKING INTO REALLY DANGEROUS TERRITORY BECAUSE SHE IS DEBT
BASICALLY SAYING THESE WOMEN ARE FALSIFYING THEIR CLAIMS AND THAT
IS SO AWFUL BECAUSE SO MUCH OF THE MEDIA AND SO MUCH OF SOCIETY
ALREADY SEEMS WOMEN AND TELLS THEM THAT THEY ARE WRONG FOR
COMING OUT AND THESE WOMEN ARE SO BRAVE TO HAVE COME OUT
ESPECIALLY AGAINST SOMEONE WHO HAS SO MUCH CLOUT AND WITH SO
MUCH MONEY AND THAT IS SUCH A BRAVE MOVE ON THEIR PART TO THEN
BE A WOMAN, AND SAY THESE TRAMS ARE JUST TRYING TO GET THEIR 15
MINUTES ARE JUST TRYING TO GET THEIR MONEY IS SO DESPICABLE
BECAUSE THE PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WHO COME OUT AND IT IS A FALSE
REPORT OR SOMETHING THAT IS SO SMALL COMPARED TO THE PERCENTAGE
OF WOMEN WHO ARE FACING SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RAPE AND IT IS JUST,
YOU ARE JUST PERPETUATING THE STIGMA AND IT IS REALLY
UNFORTUNATE THAT AS A WOMAN YOU DID THIS.
JUST A QUICK IN THIS CASE, THE HARASSMENT, THE PROOF
IS IN THE PUDDING TOP FOX NEWS SETTLED THE CASES.
5 CASES, 13 BUCKS.
THEY PAID IT OUT.
IN THE CASE OF ANDREA'S INTEREST THEY'VE NOT SETTLED.
THEY SAID NO WITHOUT WHEN WE DIDN'T DO.
THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DID AND DIDN'T DO AND IN THE CASE
OF A FIVE SETTLEMENTS LET ALONE THE NEW CHARGES AGAINST
BILL O'REILLY, ON THE OLD ONES FOX NEWS ALIKE WITH IT,
THAT'S WHY WE PAID THE THIRD TO MY BOX.
THEY WERE REAL WOMAN WHO WERE WORKING IN THE WORKPLACE LIKE
YOU MIGHT BE, SHELLEY AND THEN THEY HAD THIS GUY WHO TRIED TO
SEXUALLY HARASS THEM AND HE MASTURBATED WHILE IN THE PHONE
WITH THEM WHEN THEY DIDN'T ASK FOR IT AND NOW YOU ARE CALLING
THEM TRAMPS.
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT MAYBE HE'S THE ONE THAT IS WRONG HERE
GIVEN HOW MUCH MONEY THEY PAID OUT?
I AGREE.
I THINK WOMEN CAN PERPETUATE SEXIST IDEOLOGIES AND THEY CAN
INTERNALIZE MISOGYNY AND THEN PERPETUATE THAT AGAINST OTHER
WOMEN IN HER STATEMENT IS LEAKING WITH ANTI-WOMEN
SAID TO MEANT.
I THINK SHE USES HER OWN PERSONAL IDENTITY, SAYING I AM A
WOMAN TO TRY TO LEND LEGITIMACY TO THESE RIDICULOUS CLAIMS.
I DON'T THINK SHE IS ACTUALLY TRYING TO IDENTIFY WITH THE
EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN.
I THINK SHE IS RIDICULOUS.
THAT IS ACTUALLY WHAT FOXES TAUGHT THEM, REQUEST NO IF
THEY WATCH FOX, I WAS GOING TO THE STORE BUT I RAN OUT OF
TIME, THEY BRING ON AFRICAN AMERICANS, THIS GUY CALLED
THE BLACK SPINKS ARE AND HE COMES OUT AND HE SAYS ALL
BLACK PEOPLE ARE THE ONES AT FAULT.
THEY BRING ON WOMEN TO SAY WOMEN ARE THE ONES WHO ARE AT FAULT.
AFTER BEING PROGRAM LIKE THAT SHE IS LIKE IT IS WOMEN'S
FALL, IT DOESN'T MATTER.
WE MUST OF PROTECTED O'REILLY.
THEY BUY THESE PEOPLE TO WORK AS TOKENS AS IF ALL WOMEN AGREE
THAT ONLY THE SAME THINGS, AS IF ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR, YOU CAN
HAVE ONE PERSON REPRESENT ALL OF ONE RACE OR GENDER.
INTEREST PEOPLE AS MONOLITHS AND IS RIDICULOUS AND IT WAS
RIFE WITH MISSPELLINGS.
MAJORS I THINK YOU ARE COMPLETELY RIGHT THAT I DID A
FACEBOOK VIDEO ON THE WAGE GAP AND THERE WERE SOME WOMEN WHO
COMMON ENEMY LIKE I AM A WOMAN AND I AM PAID THE SAME AS MY
COWORKERS NO COWORKERS SO IT DOESN'T EXIST.
AND I WAS LIKE THAT WAS IN ITS ARTICLE EVIDENCE AND YOU
ARE RIGHT ABOUT INTERNALIZE MISOGYNY SO I DO THINK THAT
MIGHT BE THE CASE WITH THIS BUT LET'S LOOK IT WAS A MOTHER,
NURSE HAD TO SAY THAT FOX NEWS IS OFF MY VIEWING LIST AND
I WILL ONLY WATCH HANNITY UNTIL YOU DECIDE TO GIVE INTO THE
LIBERALS AND FIND A WAY TO TAKE HIM OFF 2.
IT DOESN'T TOTALLY MAKE SENSE.
IT'S OPPOSITE OF SENSE.
LET ME EXPLAIN THAT IF IT WERE A LIBERAL PLOTS, HOW COME
THEY DIDN'T DO THE HANNITY?
I CAN'T STAND SEAN HANNITY.
I THINK HE IS NOT A VERY BRIGHT GUY AND I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH
HIM BUT THERE ARE NO CHARGES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AGAINST JOHN
HANNITY BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLAN THOUGHT IT WAS BILL
O'REILLY AND ROGER L'S DOING IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN OVER DECADES
BEFORE ANYONE EVEN KNEW THEY WERE GOING TO BE ON FOX NEWS.
ROGERS WAS DOING IT ON THE MERV GRIFFIN SHOW FOR DECADES
AGO.
IT IS NOT A LIBERAL PLAN.
IF IT WAS WHY DIDN'T
WE TARGET HANNITY?
BECAUSE HANNITY DIDN'T DO IT.
THAT IS WHY.
THAT IS TRUE.
LET'S GO TO THE NEXT, HERE THOUGHT I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED
ON THE O'REILLY DISMISSAL, I'VE JUST LOST MY APM VIEWING HABITS
I THINK I WILL BE THE OPINION OF MANY VIEWERS WHO SHOULD JUST
TURN OFF FOX NEWS AS IT'S BECOME TO MAINSTREAM THOUGHT, THIS IS
REALLY FRUSTRATING BECAUSE I DO UNDERSTAND WHAT HE MEANS BY A
HAS BECOME TO MAINSTREAM THAT YOU MAY NEED TO DISMISS PEOPLE
WHO SEXUALLY HARASS PEOPLE AND THEIR WORKPLACE?
SOMEBODY MEANS?
I THINK THEY DO MEAN THAT THAT A LOT OF THESE GUYS
ARE COMMENTING ARE LIKE THE GOOD OLD DAYS.
THEY MADE WOULD BE COULD SEXUALLY HARASS WOMEN AND
GET AWAY WITH IT.
NOW THE MAINSTREAM SAYS WE CAN'T DO THAT ANYMORE, LIKE THEIR
ROLE PEOPLE AND THEY HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS US.
, MAINSTREAM THOUGHT
ONE MORE COMMENT FOR YOU GUYS.
ANOTHER WOMAN SAYS OPINION, IF BILL O'REILLY SEXUALLY
HARASSED WOMEN, HE IS STUPID.
FACTS, WOMEN WHO WEAR DRESSES UP TO THEIR MID THIGH AND
SLEEPLESS LOW-CUT TOPS SHOW TOO MUCH SKIN THAT SO SHE HAD
ME FOR THE FIRST SENTENCE, SORT OF, AND THEN SHE LOST ME
WITH THE WHOLE SLOT SHAMING PART THAT SHE DID.
THANKS, CECELIA.
IT'S AN INCOMPLETE THOUGHT THAT WHAT IS THE REST OF
THE SENTENCE?
ALSO, I HAD THIS NOTION THAT WOMEN JUST BEING IN THE
WORKPLACE ARE DISTRACTIONS.
THAT WE HAVE TO MANAGE OUR GENDER AND OUR APPEARANCE
SO THAT WE CAN PREVENT SEXUAL HARASSMENT OR ASSAULT
THOUGHT IT IS RIDICULOUS AND IT IS OLD.
IT'S SO OLD IT'S THE WHAT WAS SHE WEARING THOUGHT THAT IS
ESSENTIALLY WHAT CECELIA IS DOING IN THAT COMMENT AND
WE ARE DONE WITH THAT.
THAT IS SUCH AN INTEGRATED THINK THAT WE KNOW SO MUCH MORE
ABOUT HOW TO APPROACH SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE
AND HOW TO APPROACH RELATIONSHIP WITH WOMEN.
LOOK AT THE ASSUMPTIONS LAYERED INTO THAT WHICH IS
THAT MEN BELONG IN THE WORKPLACE AND WOMEN, HEY, WE LET YOU WIN
SO BE CAREFUL AND DON'T TEMPT US THAT WE ARE SPECIAL SNOWFLAKES.
IF I SEE HER ANKLE OR YOUR ELBOW I MIGHT GO CRAZY.
THEIR VIEW OF MEN IS ALSO HORRIFIC, BY THE WAY, IT
REMINDS ME OF FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAM THOUGHT IF YOU SEE
ANYBODY'S ELBOW, GUYS CAN CONTROL THEMSELVES.
IF THEY ARE BILL O'REILLY OR ROGER L'S APPARENTLY THAT
IS TRUE BUT FOR THE REST OF US, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
FINALLY, FOR HER THE UNBELIEVABLE IRONY OF IT I KNOW
SHE'S IGNORANT BUT IF SHE KNEW THE FACTS SHE WOULD KNOW IT FOX
NEWS, YOU WERE NOT ALLOWED TO WEAR PANTS IF YOU ARE A WOMAN.
DID YOU KNOW THAT?
WE NOW KNOW THAT FROM ANCHORS THAT WERE AT FOX NEWS HAVE
CONFIRMED THAT, PEOPLE WHO WENT THROUGH THE SEXUAL
HARASSMENT TRAINING WHICH IS HILARIOUS AT FOX NEWS.
MAYBE THEY TRAIN PEOPLE TO DO IT.
BUT ONE OF THE ANCHORS ASKED, FEMALE ANCHOR SAID MY BUT
MY BOSS SAID TO ME I MUST WEAR THESE SKIRTS.
I AM NOT
ALLOWED TO WEAR PANTS.
IS IT TRUE?
THE PERSON SAID YES, THAT'S RIGHT.
THEN THE
AUDIENCE TURNS AROUND AND SAYS LOOK AT THOSE SLUTS IN SKIRTS.
FOX NEWS TOLD THEM THEY MUST WEAR IT.
I WANT TO KNOW THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE NO PANTSUIT
DECISION THAT IS IT TO SEXUALIZE WOMEN?
IS A BECAUSE WOMEN IN PANTSUITS REPRESENT SOME KIND OF
POSITION OF A QUALITY?
THAT WE ARE WEARING THE SAME CLOTHES AND I AM NOT MARKED
AS A WOMAN?
I WONDER WHAT IS THE RATIONALE.
OF REAL QUICK ON THAT, I'M SURE IT'S A LITTLE BIT
ABOUT THE MAINLY BECAUSE THEY ARE PERVERTS AT THE RIVER THE
GUY RUNNING IT WAS ROGER AILES, DOZENS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT
LAWSUITS INCLUDING ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT WERE HE
WOULD TAKE HIS PANTS OFF AND RUN AROUND AND TRY TO TOUCH WOMEN.
HE EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS INFORMATION THAT HE WOULD
WATCH FOX NEWS WITH THE VOLUME TURNED OFF.
THEY HAD TO LOOK THE PROPER ROLES THAT AND SO HE WOULDN'T
HAVE THE DESK, HE WOULD MAKE ALL THE WOMEN WERE SKIRTS AND THEY
WERE ALL HIS VISION OF 1950S BEAUTIES
YOU DON'T HAVE A VOICE THAT HE PUTS ON YOU.
THESE ARE WOMEN WHO LOOK GOOD FOR HIM WHO DON'T HAVE A VOICE.
LOOKED AGAIN, I LOVE THAT ASSUMPTION THAT IS FROM A
MALE PERSPECTIVE.
IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A SHOW THAT FEATURES FOR WOMEN AS HOST
BUT THE NAME OF IT IS OUTNUMBERED BECAUSE THE GUY
IS OUTNUMBERED.
IT IS OBVIOUSLY FROM A MALE PERSPECTIVE
ANYWAY AND WHAT ARE THE FOUR WOMEN FORCED TO DO?
SIT THERE WITH NO DESK AND THEY WEAR SKIRTS AND CROSS THEIR
LEGS.
THAT IS FOX NEWS.
ARE WE SURPRISED GIVEN WHO RAN THEM AND WAS
THE TOP HOST?
BUT THEIR FOLLOWERS NEVER SAY DIE.
THE OLD DAYS WHEN WOMEN HAD NO POWER AND WE COULD JUST
TREAT THEM AS SEX OBJECTS.
LIBERALS, I HATE YOU FOR TAKING THAT AWAY.
AT LEAST WE KNOW WHERE YOU STAND.