now as I they were considering a what some considered a hate bill
no was to discriminate against I gay americans
the start a new form of segregation where businesses could throw out gay
americans
to because their so called deeply held religious beliefs
last night as we told you was gonna happen several days ago on the Young
Turks
jan Brewer the government Arizona veto the bill
here's why she said she did it 1062 does not address a specific a pressing
concern
related to religious liberty in Arizona I've not heard one example of
in Arizona where business owners religious liberty
has been violated the deal is broadly worded
and could result in an intended and negative consequences
after weighing all the arguments I have be dealt Senate bill
1062 moments ago chambre also added this
to the supporters at this legislation
I want you to know that I understand that long held in arms about marriage
and family are being
challenge as never before our society
is undergoing many schematic changes however
I sincerely believe that senate bill 1062
has a potential to create mark Rylance
Senate Report to solve I kitty by the Arizona in ways he cannot
even imagine and no one would ever want
religious liberty if the core American
and carrots down attack you so is
non-discrimination alright so the
memo was handed to her from the chamber of commerce in Arizona and other
companies like Apple American Airlines married hotels and she accepted the memo
on then read it great
okay so that's a win in arizona for progressives for gay Americans for all
americans
so of course conservatives are going to be
livid we review some tweaks in with your some videos with you
Ben Shapiro rights and not sure the GOP stance poor
when Stanzi as religious freedom out a pure fear 0 political correctness
it's always a fallback great by her
is going to be politically correct just because we want to discriminate against
certain
group Americans act as the politically correct thing to do
is to give them equal rights yeah I know years
you stand on that side and that's the problem your party and that's what
they're
recognize in Arizona little belatedly Todd Starnes rates in
and arizona Governor Jan Brewer makes christians interstate second-class
citizens
to such a great a wave looking out at the Conservatives
think that if Christians are not allowed to discriminate against other people
and give them less rights than they have then they're being discriminated against
because things like what
I'm as a right we evangelical fundamentalist Christian
I'm used to having more rights than you how dare you put me on an equal footing
you're making me a second class status know if the bill passed
gay americans would literally be saying classes they can be picked up
public places and maybe not even treated at hospitals
because they're gay see that's a second class citizen
they turned the truth on its head John Nolte
says on Twitter CNN let a full-court media press take away rights of
Christians
but just the beginning using tolerance as a weapon against us
wake up only a right-wing Christian would think that tolerance is a weapon
it's a it's a weapon against your hatred and yes your discrimination
so I guess you don't like that Jeremy Peters says on Twitter
at talking about tony Perkins according him on Fox News
Arizona veto was due to misinformation
spread by the hired left who's gonna protect the rights of questions
poor Christian so persecuted in this country only every president we've ever
had was a Christian
the the grade overwhelming majority of congress is Christian
the people who hold power in this country are overwhelmingly Christian
but cooper's gonna protect the poor Christians
when they go to practice their hatred all across the country
who indeed user bold questions
to being a boldly go to Michele Bachmann and she's going to explain
how you would be intolerant to
stop their intolerance fascinating muscles so I think that what we need to
do is we need to respect both sides we need to respect both opinions
and just like we need to observe tolerance for the gay and lesbian
community
have tolerance for the community up people who hold sincerely how she let
you feel that legislation
no I don't think that she should I in my opinion that open the door for
less tolerance for gays already in fact just the opposite
there this is a decided level love intolerant if affectively
evista rating the first amendment right to freedom of speech
expression and religious expression man
at that circular logic it makes the head hurt
okay so since you won't let me me in time to someone else
your take you're being intolerant to me
okay let's let this genius continue that a careful for lesbians won't be able to
get services
like all other americans that's discriminatory against them
it it we need again we need to respect the gay and lesbian
a lesbian community and they need to have access to services if they're going
to get very ugly
I'm other Americans that certainly is a respect but remember we are treating
people who hold
sincerely held religious beliefs and differently that other Americans either
this is that one fighter another
what we're talking about is tolerance on both sides
in it if not tolerant to force people I
violate their religious beliefs but that makes no sense
you said that they should have access to services well
this bill would stop that access to services
when issues as well we regard to both sides you gotta let the people who
a are gay get services and you gotta make sure
they're all these people can deny themselves I know logics not our strong
suit but
hearing for her slightly outside the boundaries in are in a enthoven no sense
we got a passer jeffers next
to marry is not a constitutional right
if the right to marry were constitutional right and siblings could
marry one another
fifteen-year-olds could marry one another our nation is always recognize
the right of states to regulate marriage for the common good
are these guys think they're so smart hope you see arm
it was a constitutional right then how are you you know you can do a Merry
several people and your sister it sir
but wait a minute the first amendment is a constitutional right but it also has
limits you can't yell fire in a crowded theater
discusses the castle sure I doesn't mean that doesn't have any limits
the question is there's a rational constitutional limits
right so if two people love each other and they want the same rights
as straight people do well it would be unconstitutional to given the equal
protection of the laws
or to deny them the eagle Protection a loss right
but if there's other state interest if something is not consensual for example
you're marrying
someone who's underage in his example well then you don't have a
constitutional right to do that
because it's affecting someone else try again explained logically these guys
decide
but wish me luck I want more from jeffers I why is it important to you too
to speak out about this well as I pass rings are Christian the Bible speaks out
about it
and as I as an American I also realize that no nation can survive that condones
what God has condemned
and got his condemned homosexuality
just like he does adultery or pre-marital sex is being wrong
and as a nation we cannot be blessed by God if we're rejecting God
me I feel kinda bad for them because they waste their lives trying to figure
out
with the Picard is thinking up there like will he bless us will be blessed is
the nation
what should we do maybe should work hard pass some reasonable laws
you know centre in Surrey like ya away slash burkhard slash
forehead we please eww now bless us and by the way we read the Bible there's a
million different Adam
marriages and arrangements in the Bible these guys are lying to you
that's though marriage room a man and a woman persuade you know that it's never
explicitly said in the Bible
is all this is based on Genesis because I've Adam any
but also in Genesis by the way you're supposed to
watcher for the tree of knowledge that woman was made from the reboot Man
and by the way we're on the issue marriage in how people should have
relationships
think about what happened after Adam any
they had kids who then had sex with one another
that would be incest so apparently according to Genesis
to the base is all this about the Bible so warm and a one-woman
or one brother and one sister having a water sacks and producing a lot of kids
who don't have sex with one another
to populate the earth then I guess incest is awesome
incest is best so put the Bible to the test hmmm