The Intolerable Acts was the American Patriots' name for a series of punitive laws passed
by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea party.
They were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in throwing a
large tea shipment into Boston harbor.
In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts.
The acts took away Massachusetts self-government and historic rights, triggering outrage and
resistance in the Thirteen Colonies.
They were key developments in the outbreak of the American Revolution in 1775.
Four of the acts were issued in direct response to the Boston Tea Party of December 1773;
the British Parliament hoped these punitive measures would, by making an example of Massachusetts,
reverse the trend of colonial resistance to parliamentary authority that had begun with
the 1765 Stamp Act.
A fifth act, the Quebec Act, enlarged the boundaries of what was then the Province of
Quebec and instituted reforms generally favorable to the French Catholic inhabitants of the
region; although unrelated to the other four Acts, it was passed in the same legislative
session and seen by the colonists as one of the Intolerable Acts.
The Patriots viewed the acts as an arbitrary violation of the rights of Massachusetts,
and in September of 1774 they organized the First Continental Congress to coordinate a
protest.
As tensions escalated, the American Revolutionary War broke out in April 1775, leading in July
1776 to the creation of an independent United States of America.
Background Relations between the Thirteen Colonies and
the British Parliament slowly but steadily worsened after the end of the Seven Years'
War in 1763.
The war had plunged the British government deep into debt, and so the British Parliament
enacted a series of measures to increase tax revenue from the colonies.
Parliament believed that these acts, such as the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend
Acts of 1767, were legitimate means of having the colonies pay their fair share of the costs
of maintaining the British Empire.
Although protests led to the repeal of the Stamp and Townshend Acts, Parliament adhered
to the position that it had the right to legislate for the colonies "in all cases whatsoever"
in the Declaratory Act of 1766.
Many colonists, however, had developed a different conception of the British Empire.
Under the British Constitution, they argued, a British subject's property could not be
taken from him without his consent.
Therefore, because the colonies were not directly represented in Parliament, some colonists
insisted that Parliament had no right to levy taxes upon them, a view expressed by the slogan
"No taxation without representation."
After the Townshend Acts, some colonial essayists took this line of thinking even further, and
began to question whether Parliament had any legitimate jurisdiction in the colonies at
all.
This question of the extent of Parliament's sovereignty in the colonies was the issue
underlying what became the American Revolution.
Passage On December 16, 1773, a group of Patriot colonists
associated with the Sons of Liberty destroyed several tons of tea in Boston, Massachusetts,
an act that came to be known as the Boston Tea Party.
The colonists partook in this action because Parliament had passed the Tea Act which allowed
the British East India Company to sell tea directly to the colonies thereby saving the
company from bankruptcy.
This made British tea less expensive, which Parliament thought would be a welcome change
in the colonies.
In addition, there was added a small tax on which the colonists were not allowed to give
their consent.
Again, Parliament taxed the colonists without their representation.
This angered the colonists.
News of the Boston Tea Party reached England in January 1774.
Parliament responded with a series of acts that were intended to punish Boston for this
destruction of private property, restore British authority in Massachusetts, and otherwise
reform colonial government in America.
On April 22, 1774, Prime Minister Lord North defended the programme in the House of Commons,
saying:
The Americans have tarred and feathered your subjects, plundered your merchants, burnt
your ships, denied all obedience to your laws and authority; yet so clement and so long
forbearing has our conduct been that it is incumbent on us now to take a different course.
Whatever may be the consequences, we must risk something; if we do not, all is over.
The Boston Port Act the first of the acts passed in response to the Boston Tea Party,
closed the port of Boston until the East India Company had been repaid for the destroyed
tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored.
Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals
who had destroyed the tea, and that they were being punished without having been given an
opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked even more outrage than the Port Act because
it unilaterally altered the government of Massachusetts to bring it under control of
the British government.
Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were
to be appointed by the governor, parliament, or king.
The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting
a year, unless the Governor called for one.
Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed
by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of
accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if
he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts.
Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having travelled at
their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that any reimbursment for
lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few
with the ability to testify.
George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British
officials to harass Americans and then escape justice.
Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a
fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
The Quartering Act applied to all of the colonies, and sought to create a more effective method
of housing British troops in America.
In a previous act, the colonies had been required to provide housing for soldiers, but colonial
legislatures had been uncooperative in doing so.
The new Quartering Act allowed a governor to house soldiers in other buildings if suitable
quarters were not provided.
While many sources claim that the Quartering Act allowed troops to be billeted in occupied
private homes, historian David Ammerman's 1974 study claimed that this is a myth, and
that the act only permitted troops to be quartered in unoccupied buildings.
Although many colonists found the Quartering Act objectionable, it generated the least
protest of the Coercive Acts.
Effects Many colonists saw the Coercive Acts as a
violation of their constitutional rights, their natural rights, and their colonial charters.
They therefore viewed the acts as a threat to the liberties of all of British America,
not just Massachusetts.
Richard Henry Lee of Virginia, for example, described the acts as "a most wicked System
for destroying the liberty of America."
The citizens of Boston not only viewed this as an act of unnecessary and cruel punishment,
but the Coercive Acts drew the revolting hate against Britain even further.
As a result of the Coercive Acts, even more colonists wanted to go against Britain.
Great Britain hoped that the Coercive Acts would isolate radicals in Massachusetts and
cause American colonists to concede the authority of Parliament over their elected assemblies.
It was a calculated risk that backfired, however, because the harshness of some of the acts
made it difficult for moderates in the colonies to speak in favor of Parliament.
The acts promoted sympathy for Massachusetts and encouraged colonists from the otherwise
diverse colonies to form the First Continental Congress.
The Continental Congress created the Continental Association, an agreement to boycott British
goods and, if that did not get the Coercive Acts reversed after a year, to stop exporting
goods to Great Britain as well.
The Congress also pledged to support Massachusetts in case of attack, which meant that all of
the colonies would become involved when the American Revolutionary War began at Lexington
and Concord.
References Notes
Bibliography
Further reading
External links Primary documents relating to the Intolerable
Acts, originally published in the American Archives and presented online by the Northern
Illinois University Libraries, also Camden.
Text of the Boston Port Act Text of the Massachusetts Government Act
Text of the Administration of Justice Act Text of the Quartering Act
Text of the Quebec Act