Few diseases have stymied explanation like autism spectrum disorder.
We know that the prevalence has been increasing dramatically, but we aren’t quite sure whether
that is due to more screening and awareness or more fundamental changes.
We know that much of the risk appears to be genetic, but there may be 1000 genes involved
in the syndrome.
We know that certain environmental exposures, like pollution, might increase the risk – perhaps
on a susceptible genetic background – but we’re not really sure which exposures are
most harmful.
So, the search continues – across all domains of inquiry from cell culture to large epidemiologic
analyses.
And this week, a new player enters the field, and, as they say…
it’s something in the water.
Does exposure to lithium in groundwater cause autism?
We’re talking about this paper, by Zeyan Liew and colleagues appearing in JAMA Pediatrics.
Using the incredibly robust health data infrastructure in Denmark, the researchers were able to identify
8,842 children born between 2000 and 2013 with ASD and matched each one to five control
kids of the same sex and age without autism.
They then mapped the location the mothers of these kids lived while they were pregnant
– down to 5 meters resolution actually – to groundwater lithium levels.
Once that was done, the analysis was straightforward.
Would moms who were pregnant in areas with higher groundwater lithium levels be more
likely to have kids with ASD?
The results show a rather steady and consistent association between higher lithium levels
in groundwater and the prevalence of ASD in children.
We’re not talking huge numbers – but moms who lived in the areas of the highest quartile
of lithium were about 46% more likely to have a child with ASD.
That’s a relative risk of course – this would be like an increase from 1 in 100 kids
to 1.5 in 100 kids.
But still – it’s intriguing.
But the case is far from closed here.
First of all – groundwater concentration of lithium and the amount of lithium a pregnant
mother ingests is not the same thing.
It does turn out that virtually all drinking water in Denmark comes from groundwater sources
– but not all lithium comes from drinking water.
There are plenty of dietary sources of lithium as well.
And, of course, there is medical lithium but we’ll get to that in a second.
First, let’s talk about those lithium measurements.
They were taken in 2013 – after all these kids were born.
The authors acknowledge this limitation but show a high correlation between measured levels
in 2013 and earlier measured levels from prior studies – suggesting that lithium levels
in a given area are quite constant over time.
That’s great – but if lithium levels are constant over time this study does nothing
to shed light on why autism diagnoses seem to be increasing.
All right let’s put some numbers to the lithium concentrations the authors examined.
The average was about 12 ug/L. As a reminder – a standard therapeutic dose
of lithium used for bipolar disorder is like 600mg.
That means you’d need to drink more than 2,500 of those 5-gallon jugs that sit on your
water cooler, per day, to approximate the dose you’d get from a lithium tablet.
Of course, small doses can still cause toxicity – but I wanted to put this in perspective.
Also – we have some data on pregnant women who take medical lithium.
An analysis of 9 studies showed that 1st trimester lithium use may be associated with congenital
malformations – particularly some specific heart malformations - and some birth complications.
But three of four separate studies looking at longer term neurodevelopmental outcomes
did not find any effect on development, attainment of milestones, or IQ.
One study of 15 kids exposed to medical lithium in utero did note minor neurologic dysfunction
in one child and a low verbal IQ in another – but that’s a very small study.
Of course, lithium levels vary around the world as well.
The US geological survey examined lithium content in groundwater in the US as you can
see here.
Our numbers are pretty similar to Denmark – in the 0 to 60 range.
But an area in the Argentine Andes has levels as high as 1600ug/L. A study of 194 babies
from that area found higher lithium exposure was associated with lower fetal size – but
I haven’t seen follow-up on neurodevelopmental outcomes.
The point is there is a lot of variability here.
It would be really interesting to map groundwater lithium levels around the world to autism
rates around the wrold.
As a teaser, I will point out that if you look at worldwide autism rates, you may be
able to convince yourself that they are higher in more arid climates.
And arid climates tend to have more groundwater lithium.
But I’m really reaching here.
More work needs to be done.
And I hope it is done quickly.
Lithium is in the midst of becoming a very important commodity thanks to the shift to
electric vehicles.
And while we can hope that recycling will claim most of those batteries at the end of
their life, some will escape reclamation and potentially put more lithium into the drinking
water.
I’d like to know how risky that is before it happens.
For Medscape, I’m Perry Wilson.