[CC may contain inaccuracies] I'm just suggesting why should the voters vote for any of the opposition
party after it's squandered the opportunity to govern?
Since he has three major parties competing in the elections, one headed
by him, made in the party, get that much or not.
The obsolete all the party. But it's not.
And I hate it as I hate. And the new coalition formidable because
it had been a very strong coalition. Providing ultimately for the
people is not just what is a real alternative that I know on party.
What is the real alternative? Well, it is going to be a major systemic
shift from the past obsolete policies, race and religion
taken by the at the National not to pass and the race card played by
UMNO and leading the BI said national coalition.
We will have to talk about the future of Malaysia, a new economic agenda focusing
on the real fundamentals, , and not to focus on the
activities and the interests of the big conglomerates.
So there is a shift in the policy. Governance is when
everybody talks about against corruption.
But, you know, the leaders of these coalitions are blatantly involved in
major deals without transparency. IBEX one MVP with a pass or DMB of the
present. We are determined to wipe out
corruption. And this is what I want to know, just
how the promises that have been made before many times before and
the government has fallen short. On many occasions, it's likely to be a
very tight race. What are the chances of a minority
government? This is not known as a tool.
I'm not talking about the manifesto identical rhetoric.
I'm talking about firm commitment. In the 22 months with all the
limitations, they did secure all the investigations, arrest and ultimately
conviction of those who are known to be blatantly corrupt.
Now, I must confess that there were limitations.
You must remember the 22 month is headed by my.
From 22 December, November, if we win, he's going to be here, the battle is a
different personality, different commitment, different policies now.
That's why I'm very optimistic, because here we're not just seeing and
ultimately basic is to save the country. Do we want the country to go in and rot
with the ringgit, with the spiraling prices, with instability, with the lack
of confidence in the leadership? No, leadership is
a fiasco. As far as we're concerned.
Now onwards. Some
70 percent of low income households in a World Bank survey say that they are
unable to meet that monthly basic needs. I mean, this is fundamentally a huge
issue in the country. How will you deal with that?
And you can't come up with the same
platitudes everybody else does. We're going to end political squabbling.
We're going to end corruption as well, because these things are not going away
quickly and sensibly shot.
That is where we differ, is not to increase the size of ministers to 70
special envoys and be them as hefty sum and not dealing with the specific issues
the government has to focus and the economic get back the confidence, bring
back confidence, boost domestic investments and foreign direct
investments and clear evidence in policies.
We have did the energy, the resources and the resolve.
And I think the focus, as I see I mentioned, the chief will focus from
just reaching the fuel to either cut up deals or benefiting the fuel
conglomerates. That is the top 2 percent to enhancing
the opportunities of the Assemblies of God.
They see the top topic at a lot of the ethnic Chinese, but the lower income
ethnic Malays. So actually you are in one school of
policy. You are
giving meaning and substance to what trickle down economics is all about.
A trickle down economics is one thing which has been discredited over the
years. But what more can you do?
In the face of a global slowdown, economically speaking, a weak currency
done to a strong one eyed the dollar here, which you probably don't have much
control over because these things are actually what are causing Malaysia to
see the economic landscape perhaps wither to an extent
scheduled to go down, trickle down economics in a conventional term.
I did not defer to that. I'm not saying that is the fuel so that
the benefit go down. I'm saying you give opportunities to the
SABC is a different approach altogether is not to get down economics.
The term is the same, but the focus is different.
This and Sammy's Covid eight percent of the business, but the only because of
the present policies contribute to about 30 or 40 percent of the economic.
We want to make sure that this is being prepared to bring up this change and to
depart from the obsolete policies of my day and touch our regen to benefit the
few conglomerates that soulless or Shahs and J balls do all focusing on these
small and medium enterprises. And okay.
To Dr. Mohammad has come out to say that he's
willing to work with you again. Is that a.
Are you open to the idea? He's hit it presents a purely Malay
party that believes that really believe party leaders can lead this country.
A major policy difference here.
Number two, he do. He does.
And continue to condone selective corruption.
We cannot be seen or perceived on the disk of instances to allow a system that
endless your families and your cronies. I can take a position to engage with
anyone, but we will never compromise at this stage on fundamental policies of
the economy, on governance, because this country has gone to the docks precisely
because of corrupt leadership. Announcing new policies, anti-corruption
drive. But look at the families.
The children and in-laws all have been benefiting immensely from the office of
the government. That will often you've been called the
nearly man. What makes you think that, you know,
your time has come? Well, I wanted to know.
And we say to the people, what time did you have?
You have the data, but psychologist, essentially, I'm not going to change all
the candidates in the last hour between I'm normal and fast and subtle.
There's no difference in policies is a commitment against corruption.
And the study on racism continues and the religious begot no more pronounced
underpass. It's getting a bit more confidence and
and anyone who disagrees with them or Freemasons and pro-Israel and LGBT.
And that's only the trick that they have.
And we can't afford to continue this mudslinging in this country and to begin
to go back and focus. Yes, the police are the majority.
Yes. Some of the.
Because it's a joke. Guarantees on language on Islam is being
protected. But we have to and shut do.
I know that deep fear is menaces for all races, and we know that it will be a
tight, tight race. Is there a chance that the king will
have to step in again to decide on who is best to be prime minister and lead
the country? Well, I think I see that you're been
listening to some other analysis, but I've gone down to the ground.
I think we are more optimistic than that.
Yes, it is time. But we think we can
move further and including to the rural heartland to secure a comfortable or it
is a simple majority, because we also tell the voters, do you want to continue
to have this sort of concept of the rich and the powerful, their political elite
talking about depositions and their contracts at the IBEX?
Or do you want us to get bendy to work, have policies that get for the
same for the labor, for the right?