Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe,
brought to you by The Thunderbolts Project™
at Thunderbolts.info
A major tenet of Electric Universe theory
is that electrical currents, flowing through the conductive medium of plasma,
induce powerful magnetic fields at all scales throughout the cosmos.
Of course, on our own Earth, the Norwegian experimentalist Kristian Birkeland
postulated, more than a century ago,
that electrical current systems produce Earth's Auroras,
a thesis confirmed many decades ago.
Quite recently it's been discovered that so-called supersonic plasma jets,
reaching up to 10,000 degrees Celsius in Earth's upper atmosphere,
are associated with "large electrical fields."
Nevertheless, the existence of cosmic electrical currents
mostly remains a taboo subject with the astronomical literature.
In this episode, author Richard Moore explores, from an electrical perspective,
two fundamental astronomical questions:
Why do stars and planets have magnetic fields
and why do they rotate?
Why do stars and planets have magnetic fields and why do they rotate;
and the standard model has, offers explanations
but if you're familiar with the EU model then
you have to realize those explanations just really don't make any sense.
They're talking about, you know, imagined convection currents
and a nuclear-powered Sun and twisted magnetic field lines
and, you know, all those kinds of explanations which
we know aren't valid.
Well, I saw Don Scott's presentations on cosmic power lines
and (what) he made clear in that, is that the incoming Birkeland current
determines the spacing of planetary orbits.
He showed that with his Bessel functions.
And what that's, what that's saying
is that there's a massive magnetic field pervading the whole solar system
coming in from the Birkeland current.
And so I started wondering what's the relationship
between that massive magnetic field and the sun's magnetic field?
Do they interfere with one another or what?
So that's what got me started thinking and, you know,
that's where I came up with the hypothesis that I came up with.
For those two questions we'll start by looking at the sun's magnetic field.
Now most people would just naturally say that the magnetic field is internally generated,
some kind of, you know, rotational dynamo or whatever.
And that is what the standard model says.
However, as I said before, their reasoning is all based on false assumptions.
Same thing for the question of why does this sun's magnetic field reverse?
I mean, if it is internally generated dynamo then
why would it reverse, doesn't seem to make any sense.
And again, they have a model.
What they say is, it has to do with twisted magnetic current.
So I started wanting to think, well, what what could the EU say
about the sun's magnetic field.
Is it an electromagnet?
We've got these huge currents coming in at the north and south poles
and so maybe they're acting, sort of, playing the same role as a solenoid
creating an electromagnet.
Now for those two questions we'll start by looking at the sun's magnetic field.
Let's look now at a Birkeland current coming in at the north pole.
We'll just take half of it for now, there's one at the south pole as well.
Try to think of the Birkeland current as if it were a solenoid.
Now the problem with that
is that the Birkeland current is made up of concentric cylinders
and each cylinder tries to induce an opposite field
so it's, even one Birkeland current on its own is rather complicated
as you think of it as a solenoid.
However, in Don Scott's talk he showed us this first order Bessel function
which gives us the strength of the current (for) each of the cylinders
and it's clear from that diagram that the central cylinder dominates,
it's considerably more powerful than any of the other cylinders.
And so to some extent, the other cylinders, you might say,
cancel one another out and it's really the central cylinder to a first approximation
that is going to act as a solenoid on the Sun.
So what we have then is two central fields opposing one another
to the first approximation
and each of them is trying to induce an opposite field
because they're both looking at the pole they come in at
and they're rotating clockwise, both of them,
so that's opposite torques and opposite magnetic fields.
So what the result is going to be?
We assume that one of those is going to be slightly larger than the other.
Then we can, kind of, do a vector addition of the two fields
and what we end up with is a smaller field
with the same orientation as the larger of the two incoming fields.
So that smaller field is then acting on the sun
and then the sun, being, you know, it's going to have a lot of iron in it
because stars are created in Z-pinches and that's where the heaviest ions are concentrated.
So that field coming in from the Birkeland current,
the net field of the two currents, is going to be amplified by the ferric Sun
just the way when you put an iron rod in a solenoid
then suddenly you've got a strong magnetic field.
Without the iron rod you don't.
So that explains why there's a magnetic field from an EU point of view.
Now the question of why does the field reverse every 11 years?
Well, that could simply be that the relative strength of the two incoming current changes.
So, if the one at the north is stronger
then we get a net field that gets amplified by the Sun, it has one polarity.
But then if the one from the south becomes stronger, then the net polarity is going to reverse.
So it's not really a mystery. We only need to just ask the question as:
is there a shift in the relative strength of those two fields,
and if there is then that would explain the reversal of the magnetic field.
So my conclusion from all of that is that the Sun is an electromagnet,
as that explains the source of the magnetic field
and explains the reversal of the magnetic field
and all of these arguments with respect to the Sun really apply to other stars,
to planets and to the earth.
So the hypothesis I'm putting on the table here
is that all stars and planets are electromagnets.
So then we come to our second question,
why do stars and planets rotate?
Well, that net incoming current, that net incoming magnetic field,
also exerts a net torque.
But, of course, the angular momentum of planets and stars is so tremendous,
so large magnitude, that we probably would hardly even notice
the effect of the torque of the current.
Although someone made the point that
there's a slight variation in the day that correlates with solar ejections
which would, sort of, be an indication that there you can actually measure it,
on some small tiny scale, the effect of the incoming torque.
So the question then is, what's the source of the original rotation?
So what we could look at there is we've got an image of a stellar nursery.
Now, what's happening in a stellar nursery,
you've got all these Birkeland currents that are in glow mode,
creating Z pinches and creating stars and planets.
Those are much stronger currents than our current Sun is,
you know, we don't have any glow mode current coming into our Sun,
it's all much, it's much less energetic once stars settle down
but when they're being created you've got very strong fields,
magnetic fields and strong torque acting on these newly born celestial objects.
So my hypothesis there is that stars and planets spin up as electric motors.
So basically my, what I'm saying
is that stars and planets act as electromagnets and as electric motors.
So, summarizing the hypotheses;
First hypothesis:
Magnetic fields of stars and planets are induced by the incoming Birkeland currents.
The second hypothesis:
Rotation of stars and planets is due to cumulative effect of torque from incoming Birkeland currents.
So that's the story!
For continuous updates on Space News from the Electric Universe,
stay tuned to
Thunderbolts.info