You know, I've always wanted to star in an Oscar-nominated feature... and after carefully
reviewing all nine of this year's Best Picture nominees...
I think I discovered a sure-fire formula to grab that little gold statue.
So here goes...
Sir, we've just received your lab results.
// Was this med-school drop-out an accredited physician?
Absolutely not!
// I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you've tested positive for AIDS.
Also, you're being sold into slavery tomorrow.
// Nooo....
// *It's okay Jon, I still love you.* This is Movie Night!
Hello and welcome to the fourth annual Movie Night Oscar Special, I'm your host, Jonathan
Paula.
As with previous installments, this is the biggest and most ambitious project I produce
each year - so if you enjoy any or all of it, please LIKE this video, add it to your
favorites, or share it on social media.
And it goes without saying, don't be afraid to leave a comment or two, as I always, I
will be reading them all.
Let's get down to business though...
this year's group of contenders is a familiar lot of unambitious movies.
Of the nine nominees for "Best Picture", six are based on true events, five are period
pieces, and only a couple actually impressed me.
Tonight, we'll be examining each of them, followed by my predictions for which ones
I think will win during the 86th Annual Academy Awards that air live on March 2nd on ABC.
Beginning in alpha-numerical order, let's review "12 Years A Slave".
Produced on a budget of $20 million by director Steve McQueen - this historical adaptation
of Solomon Northup's 1853 memoir of the same name has grossed over $90 in profit since
its November 8, 2013 release.
Filmed on location around historic antebellum plantations in Louisiana, we follow the heartbreakingly
painful true story of Northup, a free black man who is kidnapped and sold into slavery.
After declaring, "I don't want to survive.
I want to live", he suffers through is captivity... constantly hoping for salvation.
Chiwetel Ejiofor is positively remarkable as the imprisoned, but well-educated slave,
deservedly earning an Oscar-nomination.
Even if playing a beaten down slave is sort of a "gimme"-role.
A long time character actor, it's great to see Ejiofor truly shine in a lead role that
explores the depths of perseverance, and refusing to be victimized.
Meanwhile, Michael Fassbender is extraordinarily evil as the violent slave-owner, taunting
his "property" just for sport.
The breakout performer here though is Lupita Nyong'o.
Although she doesn't have much screen time in her film debut, she bears her soul in the
picture's centerpiece: a single, unbroken, five-minute shot that has her being whipped
against a post, constantly crying out in pain.
It's an unsettling sequence that's masterfully filmed from a hand-held camera, aided by Hans
Zimmer's moody score.
Extremely talented individuals like Paul Giamatti, Alfre Woodard, Brat Pitt, and Paul Dano are
relegated to criminally minor roles.
The slow-moving 131-minute film shows us that even the polite white people are still ignorant
racists.
Littered with uncomfortable, but period-accurate language, the lush land of the deep south
is vividly brought to life with beautiful cinematography and impeccable costumes and
art-design.
One major flaw, is that outside of its title - the film does a poor job of indicating the
passage of time.
We never see evidence that Ejiofor was enslaved beyond a season or two.
Objectively, I can't deny that this film is extremely well-made, but remove the "kidnapping
twist", and this R-rated story is an extremely familiar one - drawing many parallels to "Roots",
"Shawshank Redemption", and "Glory" - and in each instance, the original did it better.
When the depressing, bittersweet ending finally arrives, this picture left me applauding the
artistry of those involved, but otherwise indifferent.
"12 Years A Slave", "Derivative story, but wonderfully presented."
Here are your thoughts now from the YouTube comments.
A NINE and a SEVEN for "12 Years A Slave".
You felt the depiction was brilliant, especially the acting and subject matter, rating this
an AWESOME.
Technically speaking, I completely agree...
I just can't shake the feeling that this story, these performances, have all been done before.
I'll give it a strong COOL.
Our second film is "American Hustle".
This David O. Russel crime-comedy-drama film was released on December 13, 2013, and quickly
quintupled its $40 million dollar budget.
Inventively narrated by two separate characters, the sprawling 138-minute plot is loosely based
on the FBI "ABSCAM" operation of the late 1970's, as we follow a pair of con-artists
forced to cooperate with the elaborate scheme.
Including Russell's previous effort, "Silver Linings Playbook" this R-rated picture is
only the 15th in history to receive acting nominations in all four categories.
And indeed, the performance of the colorfully dressed leads really is the main attraction
here, with the director even rebuffing criticisms about the largely improvised story, "I hate
plots.
I am all about characters, that's it."
Unfortunately, that's also the movie's biggest weakness: the haphazard narrative has too
many moving parts, and is far more convoluted that it needs to be.
Gaining over 40-pounds for the role, and adopting a bad comb-over, Christian Bale is totally
seamless in the lead.
Practically falling out of her low-cut dresses, the beautiful Amy Adams contributes a delicate
and varied performance, aggressively complaining to Bale that, "You're nothing to me until
you're everything."
Complete with an unsightly perm, Bradley Cooper is a perfect foil for the bickering couple,
energizing the plot with his amusing charisma.
Jeremy Renner plays a slick, but honest politician while Jennifer Lawrence is featured in a few
powerful scenes as Bale's unpredictable Jersey housewife.
She is as incredible, and gorgeous as ever - making everyone around her that much better,
especially in a funny sc ene where warns against the dangers of Bale's new "science oven".
In a rare dramatic role, stand-up comedian Louis
C.K.
works perfectly alongside his nominated co-stars.
However, the great Michael Pena is absolutely wasted in his minor role, as are the talents
of another big-name actor who has a surprise cameo.
The costumes, editing, and camera work are all top-notch, but the film's inconsistent
tone eliminates any tension in the confusing plot.
Danny Elfman's original score takes a backseat to the 70's-era pop sounds of Chicago, Steely
Dan, and even an Arabic version of "White Rabbit" - that bolster many scenes.
Repeatedly focusing on themes of lies, deceit, and what we "want to believe", this picture
is worth watching for the characters, but it's ultimately an underwhelming experience.
"American Hustle", "Incredible acting doesn't outshine problems."
Here are some of your comments now.
Here's our scores for "American Hustle", an EIGHT and a SIX.
While many agreed the plot was overly involved, you absolutely loved the acting, grading this
a GREAT.
I was very disappointed by this picture.
With a tighter-script, and a more sensible ending, this might have been worthy of its
ten nominations.
Sadly, it's overrated, I thought it was GOOD.
Our third film tonight is one we've already reviewed, but here again - if only for completion's
sake - are my thoughts on "Captain Phillips".
Based on the true events of a 2009-hihacking at sea in the Indian Ocean, this picture has
already quadrupled its $55 million dollar budget, and scored six Academy Award nominations,
following its October 11, 2013 release.
Veteran A-lister Tom Hanks stars in the title role of this suspenseful 134-minute picture
directed by the talented Paul Greengrass.
Hanks brings his absolute best, showcasing a marvelous performance that'll having you
rooting for him the whole way - especially in his finale scene, where his emotions are
pushed to the brink, overcome with shock at his circumstances.
Sticking to what he's known for, Greengrass relies heavily on a handheld cinéma vérité
style, which works well to illicit a documentary-feeling, but becomes noticeably claustrophobic by the
picture's end.
Another trademark is populating the cast with no name participants, and this film includes
a breakout role from Barkad Abdi as the lead pirate, who sternly warns Hanks after taking
over his cargo ship, "I'm the captain now".
His nominated performance is not only terrifying, and believable, it also manages to be relatable.
The remainder of the cast is largely inconsequential, including Catherine Keener, who is featured
as Hanks' wife, but is gone after only three minutes of screen time.
Breathlessly tense throughout, the adversarial relationship between Adbi and Hanks showcases
all the cunning strategy of a chess match, with each player positioning himself to come
out on top.
The
subtle score from Henry Jackman is used sparingly, instead dropping out entirely to allow for
the actor's own anxiety to carry each scene, especially during the stressful bridge-takeover
sequence.
Although it takes a while to really get going, and many portions are repetitive, if for no
other reason than historical accuracy, the movie is - thankfully, incredibly realistic
- with production taking place on an actual container ship, on the open ocean, with actual
Somali actors playing the pirates.
The PG-13 rated experience doesn't make any political statements about the heroism or
sensibility of the massive rescue operation, nor does it ever escape the small physical
confines of its story, leaving everything feeling very immediate, but unfinished.
However, as a believable and dramatic thriller, it certainly accomplishes.
"Captain Phillips", "Captivating portrayal of harrowing events."
Here are some of your thoughts now from the comments.
A double EIGHT for "Captain Phillips", while praise was obviously unanimous for Hanks'
outstanding performance, criticism over the length, and familiar hostage-scenario theme
resulting in you rating this a GREAT.
I have to agree... definitely an enjoyable time, I too thought it was GREAT.
Now for tonight's poll question: what's your pick for 2013's "Best Picture"?
Leave your response as a comment below.
Next up, let's review, "Dallas Buyers Club".
Grossing over $30 million against its meager $5 million dollar budget, this biographical
drama film quickly wowed audiences after its November 1, 2013 release.
Based on the true story of an AIDS patient turned pharmaceutical drug smuggler, the original
screenplay by Craig Borten had been kicked around Hollywood for the better half of two
decades before director Jean-Marc Vallée was finally able to get it finished.
Following the turbulent life of a homophobic rodeo cowboy diagnosed with AIDS, the 116-minute
story is a fascinating look at the struggles faced by HIV-stricken individuals during the
1980's.
The R-rated film is anchored by a landmark performance from Matthew McConaughey, who
physically transformed himself for the part - and truly gives it his all, especially when
he accepts his terminal illness, screaming to himself in an empty car.
But later, it's his determination that makes him a powerful figure worth rooting for, defending
risky decisions by yelling, " I prefer to die with my boots on."
Following years of shamlazty-rom-coms, it's great to see this talented actor finally get
a vehicle where he can really showcase his immensely emotional talent - his best actor
nomination is very well-deserved.
Alongside him in a marvelous supporting-role is an unrecognizable Jared Leto as a caring
transgender woman that becomes an unlikely ally
to McConaughey.
The always pretty Jennifer Garner is a welcome addition to the cast as well, acting as a
more rational observer to the proceedings.
Expertly filmed almost entirely with handheld cameras, sans traditional lighting setups...
this cheaply produced picture is as realistic as they get... the actors, environments, and
diegetic sound pair together perfectly.
Exploring concepts of life, and fighting against the system, this is an inspiring story that
remains interesting without ever surprising.
"Dallas Buyers Club", a "Sensitive, but dignified portrayal of survival."
Here now are some of your thoughts from the YouTube comments.
Our final scores... a double GREAT.
While I feel like something was missing here to truly put it over the top, the acting was
obviously top-shelf.
We both rated this an EIGHT.
Now for a shortened version of my earlier review of "Gravity".
Earning nearly three-quarters of a billion dollars, this 3D-sci-fi epic would become
the eight-highest grossing film of the year, following its October 4, 2013 release.
The extremely ambitious action thriller is the latest effort from visionary director
Alfonso Cuarón.
Using every bit of its $100-million dollar budget, this stunning space epic opens with
a single, 12-minute shot that defies cinematic conventions -- bringing to life perhaps the
most impressive shot in film history.
Things quickly turn ugly when the dynamically unbroken scene is interrupted by an incoming
debris field that threatens the astronaut's lives.
George Clooney remains cool and collected during the terrifying ordeal, sarcastically
quipping to his fellow astronauts that they have, "Clear skies with a chance of satellite
debris".
Meanwhile, Sandra Bullock does a magnificent job exhibiting a figurative roller coaster
of emotions, scoring her a well-served Oscar-nod.
Virtually helpless in the deep void of space, the rookie mission specialist silently prays
to herself during an pivotal point for the picture.
Unfolding in near-real-time, this is a completely immersive and visceral experience, especially
when tensions are heightened during foggy POV shots, inside Bullock's claustrophobic
helmet.
Tensions remain high, as a the perfectly paced 90-minute adventure isn't the type of story
where a 'happy ending' is guaranteed.
Utilizing brand new technology specifically built for this picture, the PG-13 rated drama
is the most visually stunning movie since "Avatar", and equally as groundbreaking.
The effects aren't only seamless and realistic, they're captivating and artistic as well...
resulting in an absolutely gorgeous experience.
Composer Steven Price lends an inspirational and nail-biting original score that swells
in intensity at all the right moments.
Although the narrative perpetually flirts with the implausible, it is never outright
unbelievable, maintaining an almost nonstop sense of danger and urgency throughout.
A realistic, exciting, and gripping journey certainly worth watching again, "Gravity"
is a "Visual masterpiece, with outstanding thrills."
Now let's see what you had to say about this space epic in the YouTube comments.
A NINE and a TEN for "Gravity"... while there was across-the-board praise for the remarkable
visuals, there were some criticisms, from the plot to the scientific accuracy of the
film, bringing your overall average down to an AWESOME.
Hardly a flawless film... but easily one of the best I've seen in ages, I thought it was
simply AMAZING.
More than halfway done now, let's review "Her".
This intriguing Spike Jonze sci-fi romantic drama was released on December 18, 2013, and
has since grossed nearly $30 million.
The slow-paced, 126-minute story shares the quirky life of Joaquin Phoenix... a peculiar
individual living in an idealized version of the not-too-distant future who falls in
love with a talking, learning, and sophisticated operating system, played by the disembodied
voice of Scarlett Johansson.
As Phoenix spends a majority of his time basically talking to himself, the weight of the picture's
success rests squarely on his ability to carry a scene: and fortunately, he's able to do
so quite well.
And while we never get to see that bombshell body of hers, Johansson is appropriately incredible
opposite him, poignantly reflecting on their lives before they met, "The past is just a
story we tell ourselves."
Really though, her programming is so advanced that there's no awkwardness between them - and
since their relationship is never really challenged by society, either from a moral or legal standpoint:
the only thing that sets this picture apart from traditional romance narratives is that
Scarlett is without physical form.
Once you get past the unconventional circumstances of a man carrying on a relationship with a
computer...
the story actually becomes pretty familiar, and honestly - boring.
While Phoenix confides to co-star Amy Adams that he's uncertain his relationship is real,
missing are the ethical dilemmas normally associated with artificial intelligence - and
nothing original ever develops from the unique setup.
The R-rated drama is filmed with slow, static shots, and it's depiction of the future is
shaded with an uncharacteristically warm filter.
A quiet and somber score provided by the accomplished rock band Arcade Fire, makes the picture all
the more beautiful and intimate as it winds from one scene to the next.
With Shanghai unashamedly standing in for a futuristic Los Angeles, Jonze paints a welcoming
and utopian version of society that is as intriguing to watch unfold as it is believable.
More importantly, the subtle environment, utilized with minimal special effects shots,
never overshadows to the emotional story playing out front and center.
While it may not be for everyone, this is a delicate and nuanced experience that weakens
over time.
"Her", "Poetic exploration of conventional identities."
Strong opinions on this one, so lets read some of your reviews now.
Looks like I was outvoted on this one, you scored "Her" a NINE, whereas I gave it a SIX.
You applauded the sci-fi twist on an original romance story, as well as the excellent acting,
scoring this an AWESOME.
Despite the masterful artistry of all those involved, I didn't feel like there was anything
truly powerful or even new here.
I thought it was GOOD.
Now, a friendly reminder to subscribe to the Movie Night Archive channel for an organized
library of all our past reviews, and my exclusive trailer commentaries - this week I reviewed
the new "Guardians Of The Galaxy" teaser.
Our seventh review tonight will be for "Nebraska".
This 115-minute comedy drama film by director Alexander Payne made only a few million in
profit over its $12-million dollar budget following its November 15, 2013 release.
77-year-old Bruce Dern and SNL-alumni Will Forte star as a father and son pair who embark
on a curious road trip from Montana to Nebraska to claim a non-existent sweepstakes prize.
For reasons that are never adequately explained in the R-rated story, they take an almost
week-long pit stop in Dern's old childhood neighborhood in the fictional town of Hawthrone,
that later morphs into a sort impromptu family reunion.
From here, the interesting, but frosty dynamic of the father-son relationship is put on hold
while other quirky characters from Dern's life float in and out of the story.
As an old wandering drunk with few aspirations, Dern is fantastic bringing his stubborn character
to life while still keeping his emotions buried inside - and was nominated for his efforts.
In his first substantial role since 2010's criminally underrated flop, "MacGruber", Forte
constantly surprises with the depth and range of his talent; perfectly portraying a loving
son who is conflicted between pride and disappointment for his aging father.
A particularly somber moment arrives late when Forte is explaining his father's condition,
despondently admitting, "He just believes what people tell him."
The feisty June Squibb, the gravely Stacy Keach, and an amusing Bob Odenkirk round out
the core group of supporting players with equally believable, if much smaller performances.
Reportedly seeking an "iconic, archetypal look", Payne artistically filmed in black
and white, and having recently traveled to Nebraska myself: I can honestly say you're
really not missing much.
Honestly though, the monochromatic presentation seems unmotivated, existing only because it
can, and not because the narrative really requires it.
It's art for the sake of art.
That said, the steady and static anamorphic shots beautifully frame the characters, and
authentic locations.
Although seldom used, the slow and folksy music from Mark Orton helps underline some
important emotional moments in the picture, especially when things begin to drag during
the second act.
This is a raw, even depressing slice of life adventure about two generations of men, sharing
an existential discovery about themselves.
A quiet, slow-burning experience that occasionally elicits a smile, but not one many will want
to re-watch, "Nebraska" is an "Unapologetic examination of family drama."
Let's see what you had to say about this film in the YouTube comments.
Our scores worked out to a NINE and an EIGHT.
You gave credit to the excellent script, and acting, rating this an AWESOME.
I however, had some issues here, but since this film was so strong in other areas, I
have to give it an EIGHT.
Speaking of eight... our eighth film of the evening is "Philomena"
Released on November 27, 2013, this British and French comedy-drama from director Stephen
Frears has grossed over $75 million.
The 95-minute story based on Martin Sixsmith's book, "The Lost Child Of Philomena Lee" shares
the interesting true story of an old Irish woman who searches the globe for her long-lost
child she forcibly gave up for adoption decades earlier.
Earning her 7th nomination for her wonderful performance, Judi Dench stars as the title
character...
an intelligent, but sometimes clueless individual who is as sweet as she is crass.
Steve Coogan is a journalist who becomes fascinated by her plight, and agrees to write an article
on her situation, while simultaneously helping her search.
Their adversarial, but cooperative relationship is the central fixture of the production...
bouncing from playful laughter to serious and contentious arguments on religion.
Dench defends her easy-going attitude by declaring, "I don't want to hate people.
I don't wanna be like you."
But the way her face lights up each time she learns new details about her son is just delightful,
making it easy to root for her happy ending.
Where the narrative goes from there however is unpredictable and interesting.
Backed by strong and melodic piano chords by Alexndre Desplat, the PG-13 rated film
is a rewarding experience that plays out with realism and heart.
Ending with a remarkably powerful and bittersweet ending that is both inspiring and difficult
to watch.
The calm and traditional production style doesn't do the film any favors, and while
nothing really impresses, they aren't any big missteps here either.
The briskly-paced picture explores the ideas of blind faith, second chances, and of course
- that eternal bond we all share with our mothers.
A simple idea, presented via an original and intriguing story with terrific performances,
this is an enjoyable picture I wouldn't mind watching again.
"Philomena" is a "Heartwarming and charming human journey."
Here are some of your reviews from the YouTube comments.
Our ratings for "Philomena"... an EIGHT and an EIGHT.
You loved the interplay between the leads, and it's lighthearted approach, scoring this
a GREAT.
A commendable script with some solid acting, this picture did nothing wrong, but simply
failed to truly "wow" me.
I thought it was GREAT as well.
And last, but certainly not least, here's a revised version of my earlier review for
"The Wolf Of Wall Street."
Based on the memoir of the former stockbroker and ex-con Jordan Belfort, this dark comedy
was released nationwide on Christmas Day, 2013.
The fifth collaboration between acclaimed director Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio,
who plays the young and ambitious Belfort - has more than tripled its $100 million dollar
budget.
The involved plot follows DiCaprio as he makes a name for himself in the security commodities
business, motivating his hungry troops of "telephone terrorists" by shouting, "I want
you to deal with your problems by becoming rich."
Hopefully the forth time will be the charm for Leo, as his nominated-performance here
is nothing short of exemplary...
showcasing the full range of emotions from heartbreak and frustration to overjoyed happiness
and drugged out cluelessness.
In fact, he is often the only thing propelling the listless story from one scene to the next.
The bizarre and lively characters he meets along the way are as fascinating as they expertly
acted, which includes Oscar-nominated Jonah Hill in a delightfully amusing sidekick role,
the stunningly sexy Margot Robbie as the bickering wife, and Kyle Chandler as the straight-edged
FBI agent tasked with taking the entire circus down.
Jean Dujardin, Jon Favreau, Matthew McConaughey, Rob Reiner, and a cameo from the real Belfort
also have minor roles.
The R-rated sideshow of debauchery, lavish parties, sex, drugs, nudity, and widespread
stock fraud is extremely entertaining, but also lengthy; clocking in with a three-hour
runtime.
Breaking the record for most F-bombs in film history, this picture opts for popular music,
in lieu of a traditional score.
The long tracking shots, intense close-ups, slow-motion, 4th-wall-breaking, and stylized
editing make every scene in this film work as effortlessly as possible.
The film lacks purpose though, moving from one ridiculous sequence to the next with little
reason, like when DiCapario gets bombed out on Quaaludes, and attempts to drive himself
home.
The 15-minute sequence is undeniably hysterical, but it fails to contribute to the narrative
in a meaningful way.
In small bursts, this is Leo and Marty and their absolute best... but when assembled
together, I'm not convinced this is a cohesive film worthy of a Best Picture nomination.
Ultimately, it feels exactly like the 1990 hit, "Goodfellas", minus all the mobsters
and murder... so if you enjoyed that picture, you'd probably love this one too - I however,
won't be clamoring to watch it again right away.
"The Wolf Of Wall Street", "Raunchy fun, but loosely organized."
Let's read your reviews now from the comments.
"The Wolf Of Wall Street"... a TEN and an EIGHT.
Overlooking the run-time, you praised the film's unapologetic delivery and fantastic
acting, scoring an AMAZING.
While I wouldn't say the movie ever "dragged"... it definitely felt like it was mostly fluff,
rather than substance - a tremendous effort by all those involved, but I'm only going
to give it a GREAT.
Now that you've heard my reviews on each film, here's how they all stack up against each
other - another selection of safe, and conventional dramas, that seems blind to any movies released
prior to Labor Day.
I still have lots to watch from 2013, and while I never expect awesome films like "Fast
And Furious 6", or "Star Trek Into Darkness" to receive any real nominations, I was disappointed
that more Oscar-friendly pictures like The Great Gatsby, Fruitvale Station, and About
Time were all but excluded.
My anti-Academy opinions asides, there are some deserving options this year, so here
are my picks and predictions in the top four categories.
For "Best Actress", I'd honestly have to award it to Sandra Bullock for her great performance
in "Gravity".
Regretfully, I haven't seen "Blue Jasmine" yet, but if the pre-Oscar buzz is any indication,
Cate Blanchett seems poised to pick up her second trophy.
While I'd love to see Leo finally get his much deserved Oscar in the "Best Actor" category,
I feel like Matthew McConaughey had the better performance this year.
Strong competition in this category makes it a tough one to predict; the Academy may
very well agree with me... they might award it to DiCaprio if only as a "make-up" award
for all his previous snubs.
Chiwetel Ejiofor played a repressed slave though... and those types of roles seem to
always win.
"Best Director" is a no-brainer this year...
what Alfonso Cuarón did with "Gravity" was nothing short of groundbreaking.
He's far-and-away my favorite here, and likely the Academy's pick as well.
For the biggest award in cinema, I have to award "Gravity" "Best Picture" honors... easily
the strongest and most awe-inspiring motion picture I have watched in a long time.
Keeping with tradition though, "12 Years A Slave" is more likely to win... it's a safe
and conventional period piece based on a true story!
And, as we've discussed many times here on "Movie Night", that makes it an Academy favorite.
I hope you're just as excited for the upcoming Academy Awards telecast as I am, which I'll
be live-tweeting once again.
Following the broadcast, I'll also post my thoughts and reactions in an episode of "The
World According To Jon", so please subscribe to "Jon" to see that video when it's released.
But that does it for tonight's reviews and predictions - so let's take a look at what's
currently playing in theaters with your Tweet Critiques.
If you see a new movie in theaters, Tweet your review with the #JPMN hashtag.
Next week we'll be kicking off "action movie month" here on Movie Night, with six consecutive
weeks of reviews dedicated to that genre's biggest super stars.
The first episode will focus on Liam Neeson, where we'll review 1995's "Rob Roy", his comeback
picture, "Taken" from 2008, and the brand new "Non-Stop".
Once you've seen these films, share your opinions by voting in the polls below, or by leaving
a comment review.
If you'd like to watch more Movie Night reviews, check out the "related videos" on the right,
or click SUBSCRIBE to be notified of all new content, and be sure to follow me on Twitter,
Facebook, or Google+ for updates between episodes.
Once again, my name is Jonathan Paula, thank you for watching and listening.
Until next time, have a good Movie Night!