A portion of this video is brought to you by Incogni.
With the ever-growing demand for electrifying everything, we need more sustainable batteries.
Li-ion devices are cost-effective but rely on lithium, graphite, and other materials,
whose sourcing has significant environmental and social impacts.
One potential solution is being developed where wood is used to replace these materials
with a bio-based alternative.
So, would wood work or is it just… deadwood…?
That’s a lot of wood.
I'm Matt Ferrell ... welcome to Undecided.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, but it feels like there’s some new, crazy
energy storage breakthrough happening every week.
This one might start setting off alarm bells for you when you hear that some energy storage
developers are incorporating wood by-products into their battery design.
It raises a lot of questions.
Is that really sustainable?
How well does it work?
And, probably the biggest one … why?
To understand the value of bio-based batteries, we should first look at why li-ion batteries
are not as good as you might think as a long term solution.
It will help to illustrate why these bio-based batteries may be a good indicator of where
battery technology is heading.
Lithium-ion batteries are ubiquitous in today’s world.
You can find them in your smartphones, cars, or even in large-scale energy storage systems.
Compared to the old-fashioned lead-acid batteries, Li-ion devices recharge over 4x faster, last
10x longer, and store up to 10x more energy per unit of volume.
You can probably see why our electronic devices have become smaller.
Also, you can now drive your EV for a long time without stopping and waste less time
when charging it up.
There’s no doubt about it, lithium-ion devices make our high-tech life much easier and have
opened doors for new technologies.
But lithium-ion batteries are…charged…with sustainability violations.
For instance, you typically get lithium by evaporating water out of massive ponds containing
a salt solution, a.k.a.
brine.
For each ton of lithium you recover, you lose around 500,000 gallons of water.
To put that in perspective, that would be enough to make batteries for only 0.001% of
all the cellphones in the world.
In Salar de Atacama, a salt flat hosting ca.
40% of lithium global reserves, extraction drinks up 65% of the Chilean region’s water.
That’s not the worst of it though.
Refining it into battery-grade lithium carbonate contaminates the few drops of leftover water
with toxic metals such as antimony and arsenic.
Which means even less usable water for indigenous people.
On top of that, the manufacture of battery-grade lithium accounts for 40% of the device's carbon
emissions.
Lithium is not the only high-carbon ingredient of traditional batteries.
As of today, the anode of lithium-ion batteries contains graphite, which is a carbon-based
and carbon-intensive material.
In a recent study, Minviro assessed the global warming impact of sourcing graphite in regions
like inner Mongolia, who rely on coal-based grids.
The environmental consultancy’s estimate was up to 1,000% higher compared to previous
reports.
Apart from releasing CO2 in the atmosphere, graphite mining and refining contaminates
drinking water and crops with dust in China, where the Chinese company, BTR, takes around
75% of natural graphite global demand.
Aside from an unsustainable supply chain, lithium-ion batteries might also imply safety
risks.
Graphite-based anodes don’t like to be in the cold.
To be more specific, the charge they can hold drops quickly as the temperature goes below
the freezing point.
If you’ve ever driven an electric car in the cold weather, like I do, you may know
what I’m talking about.
Previous research identified the flat orientation of graphite in the anode as the culprit of
lithium-ion batteries' rapid discharge at sub-freezing temperatures.
High temperatures aren’t any better because they could potentially lead to the evaporation
of the flammable compounds contained in the electrolyte organic solution.
As a result of this thermal runaway, the battery could get damaged or catch fire.
Not to exaggerate the reports of lithium-ion batteries, but it does happen.
For instance, the batteries in the world’s largest energy storage caught fire twice in
5 months.
That’s where the wood battery comes into the picture.
And yes, I know … wood can burn too, but these might be more sustainable and less risky
approaches to pursue.
As mentioned earlier, graphite is not the optimal ingredient for a battery anode.
Which is why the Finnish company Stora Enso is providing the Swedish Northvolt battery
manufacturer with a more sustainable raw material.
This is called Lignode®, as it’s made of lignin, a carbon-rich polymer which makes
up 25% of wood’s structure.
Second only to cellulose, lignin is one of the most abundant renewable carbon sources
on Earth.
Stora Enso is sourcing lignin from sustainably grown forests in Nordic countries.
The result of this joint effort is a 100% EU-based growable battery supply chain, where
Northvolt will take care of cell design, battery assembly, and scale-up.
Swapping graphite with a local bio-carbon in their battery anode, the company is aiming
to reduce its production cost and carbon emissions.
That sounds great, right?
But how do you turn trees into a battery anode component?
Before I get to that, I’d like to thank Incogni for sponsoring this portion of today's
video.
I’ve mentioned this before, but I signed up for a newsletter from a small online retailer
and after I did I saw a major increase in the number of promotional emails I was receiving
from companies I’ve never heard of.
And that’s because they sold my information to a databroker.
I’ve also had my information leaked through data breaches at companies like Target, Sony,
and others ... numerous times ... I’m sure you’ve experienced it too.
Incogi can help with this.
We have the right to request that data brokers delete our information, but it takes a lot
of time and effort.
I signed up for Icogni, gave them the legal right to work on my behalf, and then … just
sat back and relaxed.
You’ll see updates on your account for which data brokers they’ve sent legal requests
too and which ones have complied.
It couldn’t be easier.
I’ve been letting Incogi stay on top of this for me for quite a while now and I'm
very happy with the results.
I’ve noticed a difference.
If you want to take back some of the control around who has access to your personal information,
give Icogni a try.
The first 100 people to use code UNDECIDED at the link below will get 20% off of Incogni.
Thanks to Incogni and to all of you for supporting the channel.
Now back to how you turn trees into a battery anode.
You probably know that wood is the standard feedstock for producing paper.
What you might not know is that lignin is one of papermaking’s by-products.
Typically, lignin ends up in an incinerator to generate energy.
Instead, Stora Enso is upcycling it into a hard-carbon powder, a.k.a.
char.
This is a crucial step as it turns an insulator like lignin into a conductor like carbon.
The charred lignin is then pressed into an electrode sheet that can be assembled with
the other cell components.
But is it green?
Will it mean more forests being cut down?
Thanks to their circular approach, the biomaterials supplier won’t need to cut down additional
trees.
Apart from being more climate-friendly than graphite, the manufacture of a lignin-based
anode would also be easier to scale.
Just think that European producers could tap into the 17 million tonnes of lignin generated
annually as a by-product of the paper industry, which are currently not being used.
In 2021, the Finnish company launched a pilot plant to start producing their Lignode®.
They strategically built it on the same site as their existing biorefinery, which is extracting
50,000 tonnes of lignin from pulp every year.
Other than electrical mobility, their lignin-based anode is suitable for consumer electronics
and grid-scale stationary energy storage.
As claimed by Stora Enso, Lignode® would also allow faster charging compared to graphite-based
anodes.
As reported in their white paper, their material has a more disordered and open structure compared
to graphite, which is arranged in regularly spaced layers.
This framework is more accessible by lithium ions, which speeds up the charging process.
While they haven’t provided any evidence for that yet, their claim might be solid as
wood.
Previous studies showed that graphite interacts with the electrolyte solution during the charging
process.
This leads to the formation of a solid layer over the anode surface which slows down the
movement of lithium ions, which limits the charging rate of the battery.
For this reason, researchers have turned to bio-based carbon sources to replace graphite
in the battery anode.
Last year, a Japanese group harnessed a biopolymer to make a battery anode and achieved shorter
charging times compared to those obtained when using graphite.
Stora Enso also touts that Lignode® structure improves battery performance at temperatures
below freezing.
Once again, this seems to be plausible.
As mentioned earlier, the poor low-temperature endurance of lithium-ion batteries was associated
with the graphite leveled surface.
Recently, Chinese scientists boosted the durability of a lithium-ion device at temperatures as
low as -31°F (-35°C) by replacing its graphitic anode with one made of carbon nanospheres
having a bumpy surface.
Stora Enso isn’t alone here.
Rather than just replacing the graphite-made anode, Ligna Energy has come up with an organic
recipe for the whole battery.
With lignin, water, and natural polymers as the main ingredients, their formula has a
bio-based content of up to ca.
80%.
Just like Stora Enso, this Swedish start-up is recovering lignin from paper manufacturing
sidestreams.
They then mix lignin with carbon through a process called dry-ball milling.
The result of this organic cocktail is a conducting nanocomposite that’s fed to a printing press
to make an anode sheet.
But Ligna Energy introduced another key innovation, an electrolyte solution made of water and
potassium polyacrylate, which is a superabsorbent polymer used for baby diapers.
Now...I don’t know about you, but I’ve never heard of babies catching fire because
of a dirty nappy, so I guess it’s safe to assume that potassium polyacrylate-based electrolytes
aren’t flammable.
I know that all this sounds too good to be true (dirty diapers aside), but when presenting
their creation at COP26 in 2021, Ligna Energy won the Startup 4 Climate innovation award.
This is one of Europe’s biggest energy innovation challenges, where green tech, energy, and
climate action experts shortlist the best ideas for promoting a transition to clean
power.
While Stora Enso and Ligna Energy are leading the way to try and bring wood-based batteries
to market, a team of Swiss researchers printed a 100% biodegradable battery on a piece of
paper.
Wait, what?
How does it even work?
Scientists formulated two inks, one containing graphite for the air cathode, and a zinc-based
one for the anode.
They then stencil-printed one ink on the front and the other on the back of the paper strip
that acted as a separator.
To make this metal-air battery work, you just need to add a pinch of table salt and a couple
of water drops to the paper sheet.
When doing that, you create the electrolyte solution that triggers redox reactions and
allows electrons to travel between the two electrodes.
In their lab experiment, researchers harnessed a two-cell battery to power an LCD alarm clock.
…typical Swiss.
Anyway, that’s still just a lab experiment, but a cool example to show what’s possible.
All these inventions are electrifying, but will they perform well enough to switch off
li-ion batteries for good?
A low energy density might restrict their use in some applications, but we’ll get
into that in a minute…
Clearly, wet bio-waste sounds like a way safer and greener battery raw material compared
to lithium and graphite.
But are these bio-batteries worth a shot from an economic standpoint?
None of the creators have disclosed any comprehensive estimates yet.
However, based on one of Ligna Energy’s scientific advisors, all the materials used
in their battery cost less than 1 USD$/kg.
If we consider raw lignin, this quote seems to be correct.
According to some estimates, recovering lignin through ultrafiltration of pulp would only
cost 0.062 USD$/kg.
However, this figure doesn’t factor in the cost of upcycling the recovered lignin into
a material suitable for battery anodes, like Stora Enso’s Lignode® for instance.
Just for comparison, you would need to spend 2 USD$ for making 1 Kg of synthetic battery-grade
graphite.
As any other technology, scaling up will lower production cost.
The question is, when will these technologies get to the market?
Obviously, it’s hard to say for printable batteries as the ink isn't even dry … it’s
still in the lab.
Though, the lead researcher hopes to turn them into real products within 5 years.
Seems optimistic to me, but how about the other two solutions?
As it stands, Stora Enso Lignode® is ahead of the bio-charging race.
We’ve already mentioned that the Finnish company trial line has been churning out lignin-based
anode over the last year.
Last October, the company went beyond that by signing a Letter of Intent with Beyonder,
a Norwegian energy storage developer.
As part of this agreement, the pair committed to optimize Lignode® properties and fast-track
its scale-up.
On top of that, Stora Enso can also rely on Northvolt's existing gigafactory infrastructure
in Sweden.
Back in 2017, Stora Enso's head of innovation predicted that their material might reach
commercial production by 2027.
And they’re still on that track.
Based on their last year forecast, the company pilot plant could reach full scale by 2025.
As for Ligna Energy, last March the start-up raised ~$1.4M. While there are still no clear
timelines on when their grid-scale storage application will turn into a real-world use
case, they’ve just released a rechargeable unit for IoT devices such as temperature and
moisture sensors used in smart buildings.
But how do they stack up against traditional devices right now?
In terms of energy density, Ligna Energy battery would be able to store only 40 Wh per kg.
When you compare it to lithium-ion batteries, that’s up to nearly 7x lower.
To by-pass this obstacle, the start-up is focusing on stationary applications, where
heavy weight is not an issue.
While Stora Enso hasn’t revealed an exact figure yet, they expect a lithium-ion battery
featuring their Lignode® to be less energy dense than the benchmark.
Other than packing as much energy as possible in smaller and lighter containers, we should
extend our batteries' lifespan.
But what does that mean in real life?
For example, a lithium-ion battery in a typical electric car retains 80% of its charging capacity
after 2,000 cycles.
Ligna Energy heralds that their battery could push this to 5,000 cycles.
Just like for energy density, Stora Enso hasn’t still provided a specific value but they claim
that swapping the graphite anode with their Lignode® will increase lithium-ion batteries'
cycling stability.
So obviously, with the dramatically lower energy density, this isn’t a solution for
electric vehicles, but that doesn’t matter.
Reusing existing waste streams for a material supply has big potential economic upsides.
Just as with all of the technologies I cover on the channel, there’s no silver bullet.
It’s all about picking the right tool for the right job.
If these batteries are cheaper to produce and buy, they’ll find a market … most
likely in stationary energy storage or small IoT style devices at first.
Using bio-based materials instead of graphite and lithium would certainly improve the sustainability
and safety of our batteries.
It can also help give more countries and states a supply chain they can control themselves.
Stora Enso and Ligna Energy are on the right track for bringing their products to the market.
However, let’s try to see…the wood for the trees…some of the claims made by these
technologies are only on paper and developers will need time to iron the wooden kinks out.
Regardless of how this develops, it’s this type of research and thinking that shows us
where battery and energy storage are potentially heading.
So are you still undecided?
Do you think looking for alternate bio-based solutions is where batteries are heading?
Jump into the comments and let me know.
And be sure to check out my follow up podcast Still TBD where we'll be discussing some of
your feedback.
If you liked this video, be sure to check out one of these videos over here.
And thanks to all of my patrons for your continued support and welcome to new Supporter+ members
Any Last Wishes, John Hoegger, JH, and William O’Dell.
And thanks to all of you for watching.
This is the last video for the year, so have a great holiday season.
I'll see you in the new year..