One of the best sounds school-aged kids hear is when the last bell in the last class rings
signaling the school is out for summer.
In the words of Alice Cooper, “Out for summer.
Out til’ fall.
We might not get back at all.”
Today I would like to visit one such school.
Where school was let out for summer and never returned.
The once busy school halls and classrooms are deserted and desolate.
At one time these halls were filled with laughter, the playground filled with joy, and the gymnasium
roared with cheers.
School closures are something we are all too familiar with in the United States.
Mostly impacting older buildings, urban areas, and low-income regions.
For example, the capital of the rust belt; Detroit, with its rising crime, diminished
population, reduced manufacturing jobs, and decay is an ideal environment for school closures.
Over the past decade, more than 30 schools have permanently closed their doors in Detroit
alone.
Other cities such as Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York have shut hundreds of public
schools.
But, this is not isolated to a few areas, every place in the country sees schools merge,
consolidate, or close entirely.
Regardless of the city size, make-up, or region the decision to close a school is never taken
lightly.
The school systems are trying to work through an ever-shrinking pool of funding and lack
of political support.
Causing a cycle of closures and community mistrust that further deepens the political
gap.
There are many factors that contribute to school closures and to be clear schools are
not closed without a suitable replacement being available.
One of the most common reasons a school closes is due to maintenance costs.
For example, schools took on millions of dollars of renovation costs, when we were ensuring
no asbestos or led-based paint was used in new or existing construction.
In some instances, it was more cost-effective to close the school and build a brand new
and more efficient building.
In that instance, the structure simply outlived its usefulness and had become a health concern.
Sometimes they close because the demand for education far exceeds what the current structure
can accommodate.
In the case of private schools, it is nearly always a funding issue.
Other times schools close due to shrinking enrollment and dwindling population.
In this instance, the remaining school-aged children are bused to a large regional school.
Which is the case of the school we are having a look at today.
However, an American school is much more than a slab of brick-and-mortar that kids attend
during the day to learn; for most families, they act as community centers and gathering
places.
When a school is closed; especially in a small town, people often feel a sense of upheaval
and grief.
Not to mention a feeling of uncertainty that arises towards their local governments' commitment
to equitable education.
In 2014 four independent education organizations in New Jersey, Illinois, and Louisiana filed
a complaint.
In which they asked the US Justice Department and Department of Education to investigate
discriminatory practices through the school closings.
The resulting investigation concluded that it was a matter of low tax income and overall
school funding.
Meaning; low-income areas were impacted the most by the school closures; due to lack of
funding, not the ethnicity of the local population.
Regardless, of the investigation's findings and whether it was intentional; it leaves
our minority community without the education centers and gathering places that are afforded
to more affluent communities.
The fraught debate continues, but at the end of the day, many of the pain points that communities
are going through would be solved by increasing public school funding.
Setting the economic struggles of the school system aside: Artists, poets, and filmmakers
have long realized the emotive power of this struggle and its abandoned institutions.
The closures are set against the backdrop of numerous shuttered schools and derelict
playgrounds.
Ushering in a new era of urban explorers and documentarians.
Carrying a tradition that dates back to the 18th-century, when French painter; Hubert
Des Ruin painted derelict structures.
Later in the 20th-century, conceptualist painters recognized that abandoned buildings can show
us complex social issues.
A little later the husband and wife team Hilla and Bernd Becher became well known for their
depiction of abandoned industrial era facilities across Europe and North America.
Another example of this includes a 1974 project by Gordon Matta-Clark that famously photographed
an ordinary structure in the suburbs of New Jersey that was awaiting demolition.
Later Nicolai Ouroussoff; a New York Times architecture critic, said about the photos,
they gave him a “growing sense that the American dream was evaporating”.
A few months later, the home was demolished.
Now a growing group of contemporary artists is expanding on the concept that abandoned
schools can be more evocative than a derelict factory or homes that are slated for demolition.
An abandoned school and its remnants are more personal, poignant, and relatable.
They represent a collective childhood experience as much as they represent a deeply private
experience.
​
Typically, there are two approaches in this field of art.
For one, there are artists who document the sorrow and frustration felt by the students,
teachers, and community (commonly referred to as urban explorers or Urbex).
Next there are the artists who practice a form of art called “social practice”.
They tackle policy issues and ask direct questions related to the waste of abandoned structures.
While urging residents to reimagine abandoned schools and openly engage with city leaders.
​Regardless of the approach, there are many possibilities for abandoned art as a catalyst
for social change.
A drastic example of this is a demonstration staged by Ai WeiWei, arguably the world’s
most famous activist.
He used over 9,000 backpacks to spell out the sentence “She lived happily in this
world for seven years” on the side of a Munich museum, criticizing the Chinese government
after thousands of students died when their shoddy classrooms collapsed during a 2008
earthquake.
Piles of dead children's backpacks were found at the sites of the demolished schools.
Today Ai’s exposure of China's shoddy construction practices is credited for the policy changes
that the Chinese government eventually made.
This new commitment to a safe schoolhouse left many Chinese areas with abandoned schools.
While the changes we see in the US are much less drastic; the heart of the matter and
goal is the same, to ensure a safe and productive school environment.
Back in the states, we have much more stable school buildings; however, distance is becoming
a problem.
For example; in Chicago, evidence shows that closures have forced children to cross through
gang territory to get to their newly relocated schools.
In 2013 the Chicago Teachers Union president; Karen Lewis questioned whether the additional
security costs outweighed the estimated $1 billion the district saved in closing 49 schools.
A cost that is significant when you consider private security forces, as well as the Chicago
Police department, now protect the children's commute to school.
Again, this problem boils down to a lack of funding to the school system, but in this
case, it comes with an increased security burden.
A burden that added costs to the school system in a manner that does not provide educational
resources or support, just basic safety.
A few years ago, a Baltimore based advocacy group called the Teachers’ Democracy Project
posed a simple question about school closures: “Why would we close any small, safe, and
relatively successful school, particularly if it is located in a low-income, Black neighborhood
and serves as a vital anchor-institutions?”.
The hard truth is the closures have to do with fiscal circumstances and lack of public
support.​ Politicians, educators, and reformers all have competing views and approaches to
“solving” the problem.
There is no direct evidence that closing makes it difficult for educators, but there's a
plethora of evidence related to the impact on our children.
For example; students living in low-income regions are five times more likely to drop
out than those from wealthy and middle-class areas.
And identifying at-risk students is best done with small class sizes and an ongoing relationship
with the teachers and students.
Both of these things are prevented from happening when we close a school and overcrowd another
school (to take on the new student base).
Because the closings are more often in economically struggling communities, the students could;
over a period of time, perpetuate the high dropout and imprisonment rates that plague
their communities.
​ There is a simple solution to all of this.
One that we have turned a blind eye to for too long.
We must fund our schools more and fill them with motivated and well-compensated educators.
For the richest country in the world to act like we can’t manage this simple task is
laughable.
The pentagon alone spends $746 billion a year.
That’s over $62 billion a month and over $2-million a day.
If we were to shave one-tenth of this funding and give it to education we would have 746
million dollars.
This is enough money to fund every public school, stock them with new supplies, and
adequately compensate our educators.
We could even fund our community colleges in a manner that makes them free and public
institutions.
While the pentagon's funding is a drastic example, it demonstrates that it is a lack
of prioritizing our education and children.
It’s not that we do not have the funds and resources to improve our schools.
It’s a lack of desire and political support.
The lack of appreciation for public education will only leave us with a wider economic gap,
overcrowded schools, and a poorly educated population.
Sadly, the saying “you get what you pay for” applies all too well
to
this situation.